D Bruce Hicks
Biographic Data
| ID | 1487904 |
|---|---|
| NAME | D Bruce Hicks |
| GIVEN NAMES | D Bruce |
| FAMILY NAME | Hicks |
| SIGNATURE | HICKS D B |
| AFFILIATIONS | Emory University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1990 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Lifting the Arms Embargo on the Bosnian Muslims: Secret Diplomacy or Covert Action
On 29 November 1994, President Bill Clinton's White House Legal Counsel, Abner J. Mikva, authorized the Intelligence Oversight Board (IOB) to launch an investigation to determine if claims by Centr
Dueling Decisions: Contrasting Constitutional Visions of the United States President's Foreign Policy Role
In a government of divided powers, the respective roles of the president and Congress in determining American foreign policy often are disputed. Rival Supreme Court decisions on this matter, U.S. v. Curtiss‐Wright Export Corporation (1936), and Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952), were resurrected and argued with renewed vigor following the Iran‐contra affair. Despite attempts by the defenders of each decision to discredit or reinterpr…
Internal Competition Over Foreign Policy‐making: The Case of U.S. Arms Sales to Iran
Two models of foreign‐policy making, the bureaucratic politics model and the royal court model, are helpful in explaining U.S. arms sales to Iran in 1985 and in 1986. The bureaucratic politics model is particularly useful in clarifying both the positions taken by the leaders of the foreign policy bureaucracy to the arms sales proposals and the behavior of these officials as the sales were implemented. However, the royal court model best ac‐ count…
Internal Competition Over Foreign Policy‐making: The Case of U.S. Arms Sales to Iran
Two models of foreign‐policy making, the bureaucratic politics model and the royal court model, are helpful in explaining U.S. arms sales to Iran in 1985 and in 1986. The bureaucratic politics model is particularly useful in clarifying both the positions taken by the leaders of the foreign policy bureaucracy to the arms sales proposals and the behavior of these officials as the sales were implemented. However, the royal court model best ac‐ count…
Internal Competition Over Foreign Policy‐making: The Case of U.S. Arms Sales to Iran
Two models of foreign‐policy making, the bureaucratic politics model and the royal court model, are helpful in explaining U.S. arms sales to Iran in 1985 and in 1986. The bureaucratic politics model is particularly useful in clarifying both the positions taken by the leaders of the foreign policy bureaucracy to the arms sales proposals and the behavior of these officials as the sales were implemented. However, the royal court model best ac‐ count…
Dueling Decisions: Contrasting Constitutional Visions of the United States President's Foreign Policy Role
In a government of divided powers, the respective roles of the president and Congress in determining American foreign policy often are disputed. Rival Supreme Court decisions on this matter, U.S. v. Curtiss‐Wright Export Corporation (1936), and Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952), were resurrected and argued with renewed vigor following the Iran‐contra affair. Despite attempts by the defenders of each decision to discredit or reinterpr…
Lifting the Arms Embargo on the Bosnian Muslims: Secret Diplomacy or Covert Action
On 29 November 1994, President Bill Clinton's White House Legal Counsel, Abner J. Mikva, authorized the Intelligence Oversight Board (IOB) to launch an investigation to determine if claims by Centr
Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Foreign policy (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (2 works) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 works) · Bosnian (1 works) · Bureaucracy (1 works)