Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

David W Romero

Biographic Data

ID1493166
NAMEDavid W Romero
GIVEN NAMESDavid W
FAMILY NAMERomero
SIGNATUREROMERO D W
AFFILIATIONSThe University of Texas at San Antonio
ORCID0000-0001-5446-1070
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS15
TOTAL CITATIONS130
AUTHOR COUNT15
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1989
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX6
  • National Presidential Election Turnout: 1952 To 2020

    Open Access•Francine Sanders Romero, David W Romero•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 10

    In an era when elections scholars expected American national presidential election turnout to increase, its steep, prolonged post-1960 decline sparked deep concern and generated an avalanche of individual-level analyses searching for explanation. The post-1960 decline, however, no longer dominates turnout’s trajectory; it has been on the upswing since 1996. This complicates our understanding as we have yet to settle on turnout’s description, much…

  • What They Do Does Matter: Incumbent Resource Allocations and the Individual House Vote

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2006•Cited by: 4•References: 40

  • The Prospects-Based Dynamics of the House Candidacy Decision

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2004•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    Strategic politicians thesis studies examine the candidacy phenomenon in general and primary elections, typically testing the influence electoral prospects have on the candidacy decision (indirectly in general elections, directly in primary elections). However, because the candidacy phenomena are different in the two arenas, they offer varying opportunities for theory development. Primary elections, where the phenomena are candidacy decisions, of…

  • Divisive Primaries And The House District Vote: A Pooled Analysis

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2003•Cited by: 6•References: 14

    The verdict on the divisive primary hypothesis has fluctuated as investigators have pursued a variety of theoretical and methodological debates. Although most recent studies find that divisive primaries harm general election outcomes, some claim that this effect is spurious, an artifact of uncontrolled electoral prospects phenomena. I argue that this claim is debatable because it rests on questionable conceptual and model constructs and evidence …

  • Precedent, Parity, and Racial Discrimination: A Federal/State Comparison of the Impact of Brown v. Board of Education

    Open Access•David W Romero, Francine Sanders Romero•ARTICLE•Law & Society Review•2003•Cited by: 3•References: 25

    Questions regarding Brown v. Board of Education's short-term effect remain unanswered, particularly its comparative impact on federal district courts and state supreme courts. We test this through an analysis of racial discrimination cases in those venues in the twenty-year period bifurcated by the decision in May 1954. Our findings suggest that while federal district courts and state courts were similarly unresponsive to discrimination claims be…

  • Requiem for a Lightweight: Vice Presidential Candidate Evaluations and the Presidential Vote

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2001•Cited by: 8•References: 1

    Presidential election scholars have recently begun to explore whether vice presidential nominees have a meaningful influence on the presidential vote. Their findings are in conflict. Aggregate‐level analyses find little support for the hypothesis that vice presidential candidates bring their ticket any regional or home state advantage. Individual‐level analyses, on the other hand, find that vice presidential nominees have a surprisingly powerful …

  • Requiem for a Lightweight: Vice Presidential Candidate Evaluations and the Presidential Vote

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2001

  • The Case of the Missing Reciprocal Influence: Incumbent Reputation and the Vote

    David W Romero•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1996•Cited by: 2•References: 18

    Demonstrating that what incumbents do brings them electoral reward has proven surprisingly frustrating. At the individual level, the best evidence for this hypothesis comes from studies which employ voters' subjective assessments of their incumbents' casework-related activities. Some scholars, however, claim these findings are due to rationalization effects: voters have favorable assessment of their incumbents because they intend to support them …

  • Personal Economic Well-Being and the Individual Vote for Congress: A Pooled Analysis, 1980-1990

    David W Romero, Stephen J Stambough•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1996•Cited by: 9•References: 20

    For nearly two decades congressional elections scholars have struggled to match individual-level findings for the pocketbook voting thesis with ag gregate-level findings. Whereas strong and consistent support can be found for the pocketbook thesis in presidential elections with both individual- level and aggregate-level data, significant support has been found for this thesis in U.S. House elections with aggregate-level data only. The typical ind…

  • Loosened Partisan Attachments and Receptivity to Incumbent Behaviors: A Panel Analysis, 1972-1976

    David W Romero, Francine Sanders•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Loosened Partisan Attachments and Receptivity to Incumbent Behaviors: A Panel Analysis, 1972-1976

    Open Access•David W Romero, Francine Sanders•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1994•Cited by: 7•References: 19

    An established hypothesis explaining the increased incumbency advantage is that incumbents reaped the benefit of the reduction in partisan identification's influence on the congressional vote. Briefly, the hypothesis maintains that as partisan identification's influence waned incumbent behavior's influence increased. The increased incumbency advantage is then the result of incumbents actively attracting voters whose decision is based less on part…

  • Asymmetric partisan advantage and limited strategic calculation: Why Republican challengers appear unresponsive to national partisan trend

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•1993•References: 1

  • Ballots of Tumult: A Portrait of Volatility in American Voting. Courtney Brown

    David W Romero•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Candidate Equilibrium and the Behavioral Model of the Vote

    Open Access•Robert S Erikson, David W Romero•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1990•Cited by: 67•References: 28

    Most applications of spatial modeling to the problem of electoral competition are pessimistic regarding the prospects for candidate equilibrium in more than one policy dimension. Probabilistic models of the vote, however, increase the likelihood of equilibrium. We expand the probabilistic model to include measured nonissue variables, thereby representing the general multivariate model of behavioral research. For this model we offer a general cand…

  • Group Components of the Presidential Vote, 1952-1984

    Robert S Erikson, Thomas D Lancaster et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1989•Cited by: 21•References: 13

    Except for bivariate analyses, previous research on the group basis of partisan strength in the United States has focused on party identification as the dependent variable. This essay examines the group basis of the presidential vote, 1952-1984, using a multivariate logit approach. Our multivariate analysis shows the persistence of group-based divisions between Republican and Democratic voters. Among other patterns, class-based divisions have not…

  • Candidate Equilibrium and the Behavioral Model of the Vote

    Open Access•Robert S Erikson, David W Romero•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1990•Cited by: 67•References: 28

    Most applications of spatial modeling to the problem of electoral competition are pessimistic regarding the prospects for candidate equilibrium in more than one policy dimension. Probabilistic models of the vote, however, increase the likelihood of equilibrium. We expand the probabilistic model to include measured nonissue variables, thereby representing the general multivariate model of behavioral research. For this model we offer a general cand…

  • Group Components of the Presidential Vote, 1952-1984

    Robert S Erikson, Thomas D Lancaster et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1989•Cited by: 21•References: 13

    Except for bivariate analyses, previous research on the group basis of partisan strength in the United States has focused on party identification as the dependent variable. This essay examines the group basis of the presidential vote, 1952-1984, using a multivariate logit approach. Our multivariate analysis shows the persistence of group-based divisions between Republican and Democratic voters. Among other patterns, class-based divisions have not…

  • Personal Economic Well-Being and the Individual Vote for Congress: A Pooled Analysis, 1980-1990

    David W Romero, Stephen J Stambough•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1996•Cited by: 9•References: 20

    For nearly two decades congressional elections scholars have struggled to match individual-level findings for the pocketbook voting thesis with ag gregate-level findings. Whereas strong and consistent support can be found for the pocketbook thesis in presidential elections with both individual- level and aggregate-level data, significant support has been found for this thesis in U.S. House elections with aggregate-level data only. The typical ind…

  • Requiem for a Lightweight: Vice Presidential Candidate Evaluations and the Presidential Vote

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2001•Cited by: 8•References: 1

    Presidential election scholars have recently begun to explore whether vice presidential nominees have a meaningful influence on the presidential vote. Their findings are in conflict. Aggregate‐level analyses find little support for the hypothesis that vice presidential candidates bring their ticket any regional or home state advantage. Individual‐level analyses, on the other hand, find that vice presidential nominees have a surprisingly powerful …

  • Loosened Partisan Attachments and Receptivity to Incumbent Behaviors: A Panel Analysis, 1972-1976

    Open Access•David W Romero, Francine Sanders•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1994•Cited by: 7•References: 19

    An established hypothesis explaining the increased incumbency advantage is that incumbents reaped the benefit of the reduction in partisan identification's influence on the congressional vote. Briefly, the hypothesis maintains that as partisan identification's influence waned incumbent behavior's influence increased. The increased incumbency advantage is then the result of incumbents actively attracting voters whose decision is based less on part…

  • Divisive Primaries And The House District Vote: A Pooled Analysis

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2003•Cited by: 6•References: 14

    The verdict on the divisive primary hypothesis has fluctuated as investigators have pursued a variety of theoretical and methodological debates. Although most recent studies find that divisive primaries harm general election outcomes, some claim that this effect is spurious, an artifact of uncontrolled electoral prospects phenomena. I argue that this claim is debatable because it rests on questionable conceptual and model constructs and evidence …

  • What They Do Does Matter: Incumbent Resource Allocations and the Individual House Vote

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2006•Cited by: 4•References: 40

  • Precedent, Parity, and Racial Discrimination: A Federal/State Comparison of the Impact of Brown v. Board of Education

    Open Access•David W Romero, Francine Sanders Romero•ARTICLE•Law & Society Review•2003•Cited by: 3•References: 25

    Questions regarding Brown v. Board of Education's short-term effect remain unanswered, particularly its comparative impact on federal district courts and state supreme courts. We test this through an analysis of racial discrimination cases in those venues in the twenty-year period bifurcated by the decision in May 1954. Our findings suggest that while federal district courts and state courts were similarly unresponsive to discrimination claims be…

  • The Prospects-Based Dynamics of the House Candidacy Decision

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2004•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    Strategic politicians thesis studies examine the candidacy phenomenon in general and primary elections, typically testing the influence electoral prospects have on the candidacy decision (indirectly in general elections, directly in primary elections). However, because the candidacy phenomena are different in the two arenas, they offer varying opportunities for theory development. Primary elections, where the phenomena are candidacy decisions, of…

  • The Case of the Missing Reciprocal Influence: Incumbent Reputation and the Vote

    David W Romero•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1996•Cited by: 2•References: 18

    Demonstrating that what incumbents do brings them electoral reward has proven surprisingly frustrating. At the individual level, the best evidence for this hypothesis comes from studies which employ voters' subjective assessments of their incumbents' casework-related activities. Some scholars, however, claim these findings are due to rationalization effects: voters have favorable assessment of their incumbents because they intend to support them …

  • National Presidential Election Turnout: 1952 To 2020

    Open Access•Francine Sanders Romero, David W Romero•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 10

    In an era when elections scholars expected American national presidential election turnout to increase, its steep, prolonged post-1960 decline sparked deep concern and generated an avalanche of individual-level analyses searching for explanation. The post-1960 decline, however, no longer dominates turnout’s trajectory; it has been on the upswing since 1996. This complicates our understanding as we have yet to settle on turnout’s description, much…

  • Group Components of the Presidential Vote, 1952-1984

    Robert S Erikson, Thomas D Lancaster et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1989•Cited by: 21•References: 13

    Except for bivariate analyses, previous research on the group basis of partisan strength in the United States has focused on party identification as the dependent variable. This essay examines the group basis of the presidential vote, 1952-1984, using a multivariate logit approach. Our multivariate analysis shows the persistence of group-based divisions between Republican and Democratic voters. Among other patterns, class-based divisions have not…

  • Candidate Equilibrium and the Behavioral Model of the Vote

    Open Access•Robert S Erikson, David W Romero•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1990•Cited by: 67•References: 28

    Most applications of spatial modeling to the problem of electoral competition are pessimistic regarding the prospects for candidate equilibrium in more than one policy dimension. Probabilistic models of the vote, however, increase the likelihood of equilibrium. We expand the probabilistic model to include measured nonissue variables, thereby representing the general multivariate model of behavioral research. For this model we offer a general cand…

  • Ballots of Tumult: A Portrait of Volatility in American Voting. Courtney Brown

    David W Romero•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Asymmetric partisan advantage and limited strategic calculation: Why Republican challengers appear unresponsive to national partisan trend

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•1993•References: 1

  • Loosened Partisan Attachments and Receptivity to Incumbent Behaviors: A Panel Analysis, 1972-1976

    David W Romero, Francine Sanders•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Loosened Partisan Attachments and Receptivity to Incumbent Behaviors: A Panel Analysis, 1972-1976

    Open Access•David W Romero, Francine Sanders•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1994•Cited by: 7•References: 19

    An established hypothesis explaining the increased incumbency advantage is that incumbents reaped the benefit of the reduction in partisan identification's influence on the congressional vote. Briefly, the hypothesis maintains that as partisan identification's influence waned incumbent behavior's influence increased. The increased incumbency advantage is then the result of incumbents actively attracting voters whose decision is based less on part…

  • The Case of the Missing Reciprocal Influence: Incumbent Reputation and the Vote

    David W Romero•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•1996•Cited by: 2•References: 18

    Demonstrating that what incumbents do brings them electoral reward has proven surprisingly frustrating. At the individual level, the best evidence for this hypothesis comes from studies which employ voters' subjective assessments of their incumbents' casework-related activities. Some scholars, however, claim these findings are due to rationalization effects: voters have favorable assessment of their incumbents because they intend to support them …

  • Personal Economic Well-Being and the Individual Vote for Congress: A Pooled Analysis, 1980-1990

    David W Romero, Stephen J Stambough•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1996•Cited by: 9•References: 20

    For nearly two decades congressional elections scholars have struggled to match individual-level findings for the pocketbook voting thesis with ag gregate-level findings. Whereas strong and consistent support can be found for the pocketbook thesis in presidential elections with both individual- level and aggregate-level data, significant support has been found for this thesis in U.S. House elections with aggregate-level data only. The typical ind…

  • Requiem for a Lightweight: Vice Presidential Candidate Evaluations and the Presidential Vote

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2001•Cited by: 8•References: 1

    Presidential election scholars have recently begun to explore whether vice presidential nominees have a meaningful influence on the presidential vote. Their findings are in conflict. Aggregate‐level analyses find little support for the hypothesis that vice presidential candidates bring their ticket any regional or home state advantage. Individual‐level analyses, on the other hand, find that vice presidential nominees have a surprisingly powerful …

  • Requiem for a Lightweight: Vice Presidential Candidate Evaluations and the Presidential Vote

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2001

  • Divisive Primaries And The House District Vote: A Pooled Analysis

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2003•Cited by: 6•References: 14

    The verdict on the divisive primary hypothesis has fluctuated as investigators have pursued a variety of theoretical and methodological debates. Although most recent studies find that divisive primaries harm general election outcomes, some claim that this effect is spurious, an artifact of uncontrolled electoral prospects phenomena. I argue that this claim is debatable because it rests on questionable conceptual and model constructs and evidence …

  • Precedent, Parity, and Racial Discrimination: A Federal/State Comparison of the Impact of Brown v. Board of Education

    Open Access•David W Romero, Francine Sanders Romero•ARTICLE•Law & Society Review•2003•Cited by: 3•References: 25

    Questions regarding Brown v. Board of Education's short-term effect remain unanswered, particularly its comparative impact on federal district courts and state supreme courts. We test this through an analysis of racial discrimination cases in those venues in the twenty-year period bifurcated by the decision in May 1954. Our findings suggest that while federal district courts and state courts were similarly unresponsive to discrimination claims be…

  • The Prospects-Based Dynamics of the House Candidacy Decision

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2004•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    Strategic politicians thesis studies examine the candidacy phenomenon in general and primary elections, typically testing the influence electoral prospects have on the candidacy decision (indirectly in general elections, directly in primary elections). However, because the candidacy phenomena are different in the two arenas, they offer varying opportunities for theory development. Primary elections, where the phenomena are candidacy decisions, of…

  • What They Do Does Matter: Incumbent Resource Allocations and the Individual House Vote

    Open Access•David W Romero•ARTICLE•Political Behavior•2006•Cited by: 4•References: 40

  • National Presidential Election Turnout: 1952 To 2020

    Open Access•Francine Sanders Romero, David W Romero•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 10

    In an era when elections scholars expected American national presidential election turnout to increase, its steep, prolonged post-1960 decline sparked deep concern and generated an avalanche of individual-level analyses searching for explanation. The post-1960 decline, however, no longer dominates turnout’s trajectory; it has been on the upswing since 1996. This complicates our understanding as we have yet to settle on turnout’s description, much…

Economics (13 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (12 works) · Political science (12 works) · Law (11 works) · Law (8 works) · Politics (8 works) · Computer Science (5 works) · Econometrics (5 works) · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (5 works) · Political economy (5 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae