Christopher P Banks
Biographic Data
| ID | 1493467 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Christopher P Banks |
| GIVEN NAMES | Christopher P |
| FAMILY NAME | Banks |
| SIGNATURE | BANKS C P |
| AFFILIATIONS | Kent State University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2010 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Of White Whales, Obamacare, and the Roberts Court: The Republican Attempts to Harpoon Obama’s Presidential Legacy
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Books by Our Readers
The Judicial Process: Law
The Impact of the Threat of Terrorism on U.S. District Court Decisions During Wartime
Federal courts are key actors in the U.S. government’s fight against terrorism because they adjudicate cases based on the USA PATRIOT Act, and accordingly make national security policy. We examine the extent that the terror threat influences judicial decisions in a dataset of 111 USA PATRIOT Act cases decided in the U.S. District Courts from 2001 through 2013, while controlling for other judicial decision-making variables. The results demonstrate…
An empirical analysis of US state court citation practices of international human social rights treaties
This study analyses US state court behaviours in citing international human rights treaties to advance human social rights. Employing case analysis and logistic regression, we find that US state court citation practices to human rights treaties provide support for human social rights depending upon the type of human rights treaty cited; whether the case opinion is a published decision; and, whether the judicial opinion is a criminal or civil case…
International human education rights commitments in US courts
The current study analyses the behaviours of US state actors in engaging in international human social rights practices. In particular, through citation count analysis, we examine the citation patterns of US federal and state courts in utilising international human rights instruments, such as international human social rights treaties, in facilitating human rights-based education rights. The empirical findings indicate that US federal and state c…
Security and Freedom After September 11: The Institutional Limits and Ethical Costs of Terrorism Prosecutions
Preventing terrorism is a high priority after September 11, but few studies have investigated the limitations and costs of prosecuting suspects under antiterror laws. This article examines PATRIOT Act oversight and its relationship to prosecutions. Three topics are analyzed—the Act's origins and oversight provisions, along with major criticisms; trends in antiterrorism prosecutions and convictions; and inspector general oversight of the act—toget…
Security and Freedom After September 11: The Institutional Limits and Ethical Costs of Terrorism Prosecutions
Preventing terrorism is a high priority after September 11, but few studies have investigated the limitations and costs of prosecuting suspects under antiterror laws. This article examines PATRIOT Act oversight and its relationship to prosecutions. Three topics are analyzed—the Act's origins and oversight provisions, along with major criticisms; trends in antiterrorism prosecutions and convictions; and inspector general oversight of the act—toget…
Of White Whales, Obamacare, and the Roberts Court: The Republican Attempts to Harpoon Obama’s Presidential Legacy
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
The Impact of the Threat of Terrorism on U.S. District Court Decisions During Wartime
Federal courts are key actors in the U.S. government’s fight against terrorism because they adjudicate cases based on the USA PATRIOT Act, and accordingly make national security policy. We examine the extent that the terror threat influences judicial decisions in a dataset of 111 USA PATRIOT Act cases decided in the U.S. District Courts from 2001 through 2013, while controlling for other judicial decision-making variables. The results demonstrate…
An empirical analysis of US state court citation practices of international human social rights treaties
This study analyses US state court behaviours in citing international human rights treaties to advance human social rights. Employing case analysis and logistic regression, we find that US state court citation practices to human rights treaties provide support for human social rights depending upon the type of human rights treaty cited; whether the case opinion is a published decision; and, whether the judicial opinion is a criminal or civil case…
Security and Freedom After September 11: The Institutional Limits and Ethical Costs of Terrorism Prosecutions
Preventing terrorism is a high priority after September 11, but few studies have investigated the limitations and costs of prosecuting suspects under antiterror laws. This article examines PATRIOT Act oversight and its relationship to prosecutions. Three topics are analyzed—the Act's origins and oversight provisions, along with major criticisms; trends in antiterrorism prosecutions and convictions; and inspector general oversight of the act—toget…
International human education rights commitments in US courts
The current study analyses the behaviours of US state actors in engaging in international human social rights practices. In particular, through citation count analysis, we examine the citation patterns of US federal and state courts in utilising international human rights instruments, such as international human social rights treaties, in facilitating human rights-based education rights. The empirical findings indicate that US federal and state c…
An empirical analysis of US state court citation practices of international human social rights treaties
This study analyses US state court behaviours in citing international human rights treaties to advance human social rights. Employing case analysis and logistic regression, we find that US state court citation practices to human rights treaties provide support for human social rights depending upon the type of human rights treaty cited; whether the case opinion is a published decision; and, whether the judicial opinion is a criminal or civil case…
The Impact of the Threat of Terrorism on U.S. District Court Decisions During Wartime
Federal courts are key actors in the U.S. government’s fight against terrorism because they adjudicate cases based on the USA PATRIOT Act, and accordingly make national security policy. We examine the extent that the terror threat influences judicial decisions in a dataset of 111 USA PATRIOT Act cases decided in the U.S. District Courts from 2001 through 2013, while controlling for other judicial decision-making variables. The results demonstrate…
Books by Our Readers
The Judicial Process: Law
Of White Whales, Obamacare, and the Roberts Court: The Republican Attempts to Harpoon Obama’s Presidential Legacy
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Law (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Fundamental rights (2 works) · Human rights (2 works) · Human Rights and Development (2 works) · International human rights law (2 works) · International Law and Human Rights (2 works) · Patriot Act (2 works)