Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Paul Elbourne

Biographic Data

ID1498231
NAMEPaul Elbourne
GIVEN NAMESPaul
FAMILY NAMEElbourne
SIGNATUREELBOURNE P
AFFILIATIONSQueen Mary University of London
ORCID0000-0003-1358-348X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS17
TOTAL CITATIONS116
AUTHOR COUNT17
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2001
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX4
  • Adjectives without syntactic categories

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2026

    Elbourne has proposed that future research should investigate the possibility of eliminating syntactic categories from linguistic theory and letting their functions be taken over by independently motivated semantic categories such as semantic types (‘A program for eliminating syntactic categories’, 2024, Linguistic Inquiry ). The current article applies this research programme to the case of adjectives. It argues that adjectives should be conceiv…

  • A Program for Eliminating Syntactic Categories

    Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2024

    Future research could profitably explore the hypothesis that syntactic categories should be eliminated from linguistic theory and their work taken over largely by the independently motivated system of semantic types. This would be a notable gain in theoretical economy, provided that their elimination does not necessitate innovations of equivalent complexity elsewhere in the theory

  • Weather predicates, binding, and radical contextualism

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Mind & Language•2022

    The implicit content indicating location associated with “raining” and other weather predicates is a definite description meaning “the location occupied by x ,” where the individual variable “ x ” can be referential or bound. This position has deleterious consequences for certain varieties of radical contextualism

  • Presupposition, assertion, and definite descriptions

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistics and Philosophy•2021

    In recent work on the semantics of definite descriptions, some theorists (Elbourne in Definite descriptions, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013; Schoubye in Noûs 47(3):496–533, 2013) have advocated broadly Fregean accounts, whereby a definite description ‘the F ’ introduces a presupposition to the effect that there is exactly one F and refers to it if there is, while other theorists (Abbott, in: Gundel, Hedberg (eds) Reference: Interdisciplina…

  • Evidence for generalized quantifier semantics in the interpretation of the English neuter singular pronoun

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2021•References: 32

    The English pronounitcan anaphorically take on the meaning of a salient generalized quantifier when it occurs in subject position followed by an elided Verb Phrase and (optionally) a VP-level operator. The extent to which theories of pronoun interpretation will have to be altered to take account of this finding will depend on whether the phenomenon is unique to English or part of a crosslinguistic pattern

  • Vagueness, contextualism, and ellipsis

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Semantics and Pragmatics•2019

    Stanley (2003) has argued that contextualist theories of vagueness are inconsistent with a certain fact about the interpretation of indexicals in Verb Phrase ellipsis, namely that the semantic content of an indexical in an elided verb phrase must be the same as the semantic content of the corresponding indexical in the antecedent verb phrase. In this paper, some counterexamples are adduced to undermine confidence in this generalization and hence …

  • Incomplete descriptions and indistinguishable participants

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2016•Cited by: 1•References: 45

  • Definite Descriptions

    Paul Elbourne•BOOK•Definite Descriptions•2013

    Paul Elbourne defends the Fregean view that definite descriptions ('the table', 'the King of France') refer to individuals, and offers a new and radical account of the semantics of pronouns. He draws on a wide range of work, from Frege, Peano, and Russell to the latest findings in linguistics philosophy of language, and psycholinguistics.

  • On bishop sentences

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2010•Cited by: 2•References: 11

  • Bishop Sentences and Donkey Cataphora: A Response to Barker and Shan

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Semantics and Pragmatics•2009

    in Barker & Shan 2008

  • Demonstratives as individual concepts

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistics and Philosophy•2008

    Using a version of situation semantics, this article argues that bare and complex demonstratives are interpreted as individual concepts.

  • The Argument From Binding

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Philosophical Perspectives•2008•Cited by: 3•References: 3

  • Ellipsis Sites as Definite Descriptions

    Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2008•Cited by: 11•References: 15

    This article analyzes three phenomena that are troublesome for some theories of ellipsis: the existence of sloppy readings when the relevant pronouns cannot possibly be bound; cases where the antecedent of ellipsis does itself contain an ellipsis site, but in resolving the larger ellipsis the interpretation understood at the ellipsis site in the antecedent is not used; and cases where an ellipsis site draws upon material from two or more separate…

  • The Interpretation of Pronouns

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne, Paul D Elbourne•ARTICLE•Language and Linguistics Compass•2008•Cited by: 2•References: 47

    There is no overall consensus on the interpretation of pronouns, but recent research generally argues for one of three positions: that pronouns are individual variables, that they are covert definite descriptions, or that they are identity functions

  • On the Acquisition of Principle B

    Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2005•Cited by: 10•References: 6

    Chien and Wexler (1990) reported that children obeyed Principle B of binding theory when the antecedent was a quantifier but not when the antecedent was referential. This was argued by Grodzinsky and Reinhart (1993) to support Reinhart's (1983) theory according to which Principle B affects only bound pronouns. Since then, other studies have supported the asymmetry between referential and quantifier antecedents. This article, however, argues that …

  • Total Reconstruction, PF Movement, and Derivational Order

    Uli Sauerland, Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2002•Cited by: 51•References: 16

    Theories of total reconstruction have generally supposed that movement can be followed by an undoing operation like LF lowering (May 1977, 1985) or deletion of higher copies (Chomsky 1993). We argue that reconstruction effects can be derived only if the original movement is purely phonological. There are no undoing operations. We present three distinct arguments, based on an interaction between raising and wh-movement in English, facts from agree…

  • E-Type Anaphora as NP-Deletion

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2001•Cited by: 36•References: 20

  • Total Reconstruction, PF Movement, and Derivational Order

    Uli Sauerland, Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2002•Cited by: 51•References: 16

    Theories of total reconstruction have generally supposed that movement can be followed by an undoing operation like LF lowering (May 1977, 1985) or deletion of higher copies (Chomsky 1993). We argue that reconstruction effects can be derived only if the original movement is purely phonological. There are no undoing operations. We present three distinct arguments, based on an interaction between raising and wh-movement in English, facts from agree…

  • E-Type Anaphora as NP-Deletion

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2001•Cited by: 36•References: 20

  • Ellipsis Sites as Definite Descriptions

    Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2008•Cited by: 11•References: 15

    This article analyzes three phenomena that are troublesome for some theories of ellipsis: the existence of sloppy readings when the relevant pronouns cannot possibly be bound; cases where the antecedent of ellipsis does itself contain an ellipsis site, but in resolving the larger ellipsis the interpretation understood at the ellipsis site in the antecedent is not used; and cases where an ellipsis site draws upon material from two or more separate…

  • On the Acquisition of Principle B

    Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2005•Cited by: 10•References: 6

    Chien and Wexler (1990) reported that children obeyed Principle B of binding theory when the antecedent was a quantifier but not when the antecedent was referential. This was argued by Grodzinsky and Reinhart (1993) to support Reinhart's (1983) theory according to which Principle B affects only bound pronouns. Since then, other studies have supported the asymmetry between referential and quantifier antecedents. This article, however, argues that …

  • The Argument From Binding

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Philosophical Perspectives•2008•Cited by: 3•References: 3

  • On bishop sentences

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2010•Cited by: 2•References: 11

  • The Interpretation of Pronouns

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne, Paul D Elbourne•ARTICLE•Language and Linguistics Compass•2008•Cited by: 2•References: 47

    There is no overall consensus on the interpretation of pronouns, but recent research generally argues for one of three positions: that pronouns are individual variables, that they are covert definite descriptions, or that they are identity functions

  • Incomplete descriptions and indistinguishable participants

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2016•Cited by: 1•References: 45

  • E-Type Anaphora as NP-Deletion

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2001•Cited by: 36•References: 20

  • Total Reconstruction, PF Movement, and Derivational Order

    Uli Sauerland, Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2002•Cited by: 51•References: 16

    Theories of total reconstruction have generally supposed that movement can be followed by an undoing operation like LF lowering (May 1977, 1985) or deletion of higher copies (Chomsky 1993). We argue that reconstruction effects can be derived only if the original movement is purely phonological. There are no undoing operations. We present three distinct arguments, based on an interaction between raising and wh-movement in English, facts from agree…

  • On the Acquisition of Principle B

    Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2005•Cited by: 10•References: 6

    Chien and Wexler (1990) reported that children obeyed Principle B of binding theory when the antecedent was a quantifier but not when the antecedent was referential. This was argued by Grodzinsky and Reinhart (1993) to support Reinhart's (1983) theory according to which Principle B affects only bound pronouns. Since then, other studies have supported the asymmetry between referential and quantifier antecedents. This article, however, argues that …

  • Demonstratives as individual concepts

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistics and Philosophy•2008

    Using a version of situation semantics, this article argues that bare and complex demonstratives are interpreted as individual concepts.

  • The Argument From Binding

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Philosophical Perspectives•2008•Cited by: 3•References: 3

  • Ellipsis Sites as Definite Descriptions

    Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2008•Cited by: 11•References: 15

    This article analyzes three phenomena that are troublesome for some theories of ellipsis: the existence of sloppy readings when the relevant pronouns cannot possibly be bound; cases where the antecedent of ellipsis does itself contain an ellipsis site, but in resolving the larger ellipsis the interpretation understood at the ellipsis site in the antecedent is not used; and cases where an ellipsis site draws upon material from two or more separate…

  • The Interpretation of Pronouns

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne, Paul D Elbourne•ARTICLE•Language and Linguistics Compass•2008•Cited by: 2•References: 47

    There is no overall consensus on the interpretation of pronouns, but recent research generally argues for one of three positions: that pronouns are individual variables, that they are covert definite descriptions, or that they are identity functions

  • Bishop Sentences and Donkey Cataphora: A Response to Barker and Shan

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Semantics and Pragmatics•2009

    in Barker & Shan 2008

  • On bishop sentences

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2010•Cited by: 2•References: 11

  • Definite Descriptions

    Paul Elbourne•BOOK•Definite Descriptions•2013

    Paul Elbourne defends the Fregean view that definite descriptions ('the table', 'the King of France') refer to individuals, and offers a new and radical account of the semantics of pronouns. He draws on a wide range of work, from Frege, Peano, and Russell to the latest findings in linguistics philosophy of language, and psycholinguistics.

  • Incomplete descriptions and indistinguishable participants

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2016•Cited by: 1•References: 45

  • Vagueness, contextualism, and ellipsis

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Semantics and Pragmatics•2019

    Stanley (2003) has argued that contextualist theories of vagueness are inconsistent with a certain fact about the interpretation of indexicals in Verb Phrase ellipsis, namely that the semantic content of an indexical in an elided verb phrase must be the same as the semantic content of the corresponding indexical in the antecedent verb phrase. In this paper, some counterexamples are adduced to undermine confidence in this generalization and hence …

  • Presupposition, assertion, and definite descriptions

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistics and Philosophy•2021

    In recent work on the semantics of definite descriptions, some theorists (Elbourne in Definite descriptions, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013; Schoubye in Noûs 47(3):496–533, 2013) have advocated broadly Fregean accounts, whereby a definite description ‘the F ’ introduces a presupposition to the effect that there is exactly one F and refers to it if there is, while other theorists (Abbott, in: Gundel, Hedberg (eds) Reference: Interdisciplina…

  • Evidence for generalized quantifier semantics in the interpretation of the English neuter singular pronoun

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language Semantics•2021•References: 32

    The English pronounitcan anaphorically take on the meaning of a salient generalized quantifier when it occurs in subject position followed by an elided Verb Phrase and (optionally) a VP-level operator. The extent to which theories of pronoun interpretation will have to be altered to take account of this finding will depend on whether the phenomenon is unique to English or part of a crosslinguistic pattern

  • Weather predicates, binding, and radical contextualism

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Mind & Language•2022

    The implicit content indicating location associated with “raining” and other weather predicates is a definite description meaning “the location occupied by x ,” where the individual variable “ x ” can be referential or bound. This position has deleterious consequences for certain varieties of radical contextualism

  • A Program for Eliminating Syntactic Categories

    Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2024

    Future research could profitably explore the hypothesis that syntactic categories should be eliminated from linguistic theory and their work taken over largely by the independently motivated system of semantic types. This would be a notable gain in theoretical economy, provided that their elimination does not necessitate innovations of equivalent complexity elsewhere in the theory

  • Adjectives without syntactic categories

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•ARTICLE•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2026

    Elbourne has proposed that future research should investigate the possibility of eliminating syntactic categories from linguistic theory and letting their functions be taken over by independently motivated semantic categories such as semantic types (‘A program for eliminating syntactic categories’, 2024, Linguistic Inquiry ). The current article applies this research programme to the case of adjectives. It argues that adjectives should be conceiv…

Linguistics (15 works) · Philosophy (15 works) · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (15 works) · Computer Science (11 works) · Psychology (8 works) · Epistemology (6 works) · Natural Language Processing Techniques (6 works) · Syntax (6 works) · History (5 works) · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae