Paolo Labinaz
Biographic Data
| ID | 1508216 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Paolo Labinaz |
| GIVEN NAMES | Paolo |
| FAMILY NAME | Labinaz |
| SIGNATURE | LABINAZ P |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Trieste |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2108-4659 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 8 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Illocutionary force beyond relativism
This paper examines how to account for illocutionary force, with particular attention to situations in which speakers and hearers diverge in their attributions of force. Such cases raise the question of whether, and in what sense, a single utterance can have more than one illocutionary force. Standard intentionalist accounts reject this possibility, maintaining that each utterance has one correct force, fixed by the speaker’s intention. Interacti…
Moorean utterances and the illocutionary dynamics of assertion
This paper aims to show, in the light of an Austin-inspired speech-act theoretical framework, that there is a fundamental difference in the absurdity that occurs when one utters either the belief or the knowledge version of Moorean sentences (whose linguistic form amounts to “ p , but I don’t believe/know that p ”) and that this difference lies in the kind of speech act norms that their utterance overtly violates. To do so, I will consider the co…
The problem of knowledge dissemination in social network discussions
Argumentation as a dimension of discourse
The aim of this paper is to explore the status of argumentative discourse. We argue that argumentation can contribute to instances of different discourse genres, regardless of whether it is functional to their purposes. By analyzing examples from the daily press in the light of an approach to discourse analysis inspired by pragmatics, we show that also texts that are not expected to be argumentative have underlying argumentative structures and th…
Brandom's deontic scorekeeping model and the assertive family
Argumentation as a dimension of discourse
The aim of this paper is to explore the status of argumentative discourse. We argue that argumentation can contribute to instances of different discourse genres, regardless of whether it is functional to their purposes. By analyzing examples from the daily press in the light of an approach to discourse analysis inspired by pragmatics, we show that also texts that are not expected to be argumentative have underlying argumentative structures and th…
Brandom's deontic scorekeeping model and the assertive family
The problem of knowledge dissemination in social network discussions
Moorean utterances and the illocutionary dynamics of assertion
This paper aims to show, in the light of an Austin-inspired speech-act theoretical framework, that there is a fundamental difference in the absurdity that occurs when one utters either the belief or the knowledge version of Moorean sentences (whose linguistic form amounts to “ p , but I don’t believe/know that p ”) and that this difference lies in the kind of speech act norms that their utterance overtly violates. To do so, I will consider the co…
Illocutionary force beyond relativism
This paper examines how to account for illocutionary force, with particular attention to situations in which speakers and hearers diverge in their attributions of force. Such cases raise the question of whether, and in what sense, a single utterance can have more than one illocutionary force. Standard intentionalist accounts reject this possibility, maintaining that each utterance has one correct force, fixed by the speaker’s intention. Interacti…
Epistemology (4 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Linguistics (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works)