Marissa F Mcbride

Biographic Data

ID1572899
NAMEMarissa F Mcbride
GIVEN NAMESMarissa F
FAMILY NAMEMcbride
SIGNATUREMCBRIDE M F
AFFILIATIONSHarvard University
ORCID0000-0002-7498-292X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS10
AUTHOR COUNT4
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2009
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
H-INDEX2

  • Engaging Regional Stakeholders in Scenario Planning for the Long-Term Preservation of Ecosystem Services in Northwestern Virginia

    Iara Lacher, Thomas S Akre et al.ARTICLECase Studies in the Environment2019

    This case study describes the application of a framework for developing stakeholder-driven scenarios of the future. The purpose of these scenarios is to inform land use planning toward the protection of ecosystems and derivable ecosystem services in Northwestern Virginia. We held two scenario development workshops with regional experts in conservation, agriculture, land use planning, policy, and economic development to create scenarios of land us…

  • Increasing the effectiveness of participatory scenario development through codesign

    Open AccessMarissa F Mcbride, Kathleen F Lambert et al.ARTICLEConservation Ecology2017Cited by: 7

    McBride, M. F., K. F. Lambert, E. S. Huff, K. A. Theoharides, P. Field, and J. R. Thompson. 2017. Increasing the effectiveness of participatory scenario development through codesign. Ecology and Society 22(3):16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09386-220316

  • Classical meets modern in the Idea protocol for structured expert judgement

    Anca Hanea, A M Hanea et al.ARTICLEJournal of Risk Research2016Cited by: 3

    Expert judgement is pervasive in all forms of risk analysis, yet the development of tools to deal with such judgements in a repeatable and transparent fashion is relatively recent. This work outlines new findings related to an approach to expert elicitation termed the IDEA protocol. IDEA combines psychologically robust interactions among experts with mathematical aggregation of individual estimates. In particular, this research explores whether c…

  • Reducing Overconfidence in the Interval Judgments of Experts

    Open AccessAndrew Speirs‐Bridge, Andrew Speirs-Bridge et al.ARTICLERisk Analysis2009

    Elicitation of expert opinion is important for risk analysis when only limited data are available. Expert opinion is often elicited in the form of subjective confidence intervals; however, these are prone to substantial overconfidence. We investigated the influence of elicitation question format, in particular the number of steps in the elicitation procedure. In a 3-point elicitation procedure, an expert is asked for a lower limit, upper limit, a…