Milena Wiget
Biographic Data
| ID | 1573880 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Milena Wiget |
| GIVEN NAMES | Milena |
| FAMILY NAME | Wiget |
| SIGNATURE | WIGET M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology |
| ORCID | 0009-0004-3380-5363 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 7 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Understanding policy instrument preferences under conflicting beliefs and uncertainty
Anticipating policy instrument preferences can be an important step in policy design to address pressing sustainability problems. But studying preferences for policy instruments is a difficult task because sustainability problems involve a non-negligible degree of trade-offs and uncertainty. We therefore study the role of actors’ underlying ideologies (policy core beliefs) and risk attitudes in forming their preferences for different instruments.…
A typology of interdisciplinary collaborations: Insights From Agri-Food Transformation Research
To understand complex societal transformations, scholars have called for more interdisciplinary research in which researchers from various disciplines collaborate. To support the implementation of such collaborations, we introduce a novel typology of interdisciplinary collaborations developed from the literature and from structured reflection on our own research experience. The typology distinguishes (I) common base, (II) common destination, and …
Does (dis)agreement reflect beliefs? An analysis of advocacy coalitions in Swiss pesticide policy
Agricultural pesticide use is a wicked sustainability challenge: Trade‐offs exist between health, environmental, agro‐economic, and socio‐political objectives. Various actors involved have diverse beliefs regarding these trade‐offs and policies to address the challenge. But to what extent does the agreement or disagreement between actors reflect belief similarities or differences, and thus, the formation of advocacy coalitions? To answer this que…
Barriers to evidence use for sustainability: Insights from pesticide policy and practice
Calls for supporting sustainability through more and better research rest on an incomplete understanding of scientific evidence use. We argue that a variety of barriers to a transformative impact of evidence arises from diverse actor motivations within different stages of evidence use. We abductively specify this variety in policy and practice arenas for three actor motivations (truth-seeking, sense-making, and utility-maximizing) and five stages…
Main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation
Wiget, M., A. Muller, and A. Hilbeck. 2020. Main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation. Ecology and Society 25(3):25. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11774-250325
Does (dis)agreement reflect beliefs? An analysis of advocacy coalitions in Swiss pesticide policy
Agricultural pesticide use is a wicked sustainability challenge: Trade‐offs exist between health, environmental, agro‐economic, and socio‐political objectives. Various actors involved have diverse beliefs regarding these trade‐offs and policies to address the challenge. But to what extent does the agreement or disagreement between actors reflect belief similarities or differences, and thus, the formation of advocacy coalitions? To answer this que…
Barriers to evidence use for sustainability: Insights from pesticide policy and practice
Calls for supporting sustainability through more and better research rest on an incomplete understanding of scientific evidence use. We argue that a variety of barriers to a transformative impact of evidence arises from diverse actor motivations within different stages of evidence use. We abductively specify this variety in policy and practice arenas for three actor motivations (truth-seeking, sense-making, and utility-maximizing) and five stages…
A typology of interdisciplinary collaborations: Insights From Agri-Food Transformation Research
To understand complex societal transformations, scholars have called for more interdisciplinary research in which researchers from various disciplines collaborate. To support the implementation of such collaborations, we introduce a novel typology of interdisciplinary collaborations developed from the literature and from structured reflection on our own research experience. The typology distinguishes (I) common base, (II) common destination, and …
Main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation
Wiget, M., A. Muller, and A. Hilbeck. 2020. Main challenges and key features of indicator-based agroecological assessment frameworks in the context of international cooperation. Ecology and Society 25(3):25. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11774-250325
Barriers to evidence use for sustainability: Insights from pesticide policy and practice
Calls for supporting sustainability through more and better research rest on an incomplete understanding of scientific evidence use. We argue that a variety of barriers to a transformative impact of evidence arises from diverse actor motivations within different stages of evidence use. We abductively specify this variety in policy and practice arenas for three actor motivations (truth-seeking, sense-making, and utility-maximizing) and five stages…
Does (dis)agreement reflect beliefs? An analysis of advocacy coalitions in Swiss pesticide policy
Agricultural pesticide use is a wicked sustainability challenge: Trade‐offs exist between health, environmental, agro‐economic, and socio‐political objectives. Various actors involved have diverse beliefs regarding these trade‐offs and policies to address the challenge. But to what extent does the agreement or disagreement between actors reflect belief similarities or differences, and thus, the formation of advocacy coalitions? To answer this que…
Understanding policy instrument preferences under conflicting beliefs and uncertainty
Anticipating policy instrument preferences can be an important step in policy design to address pressing sustainability problems. But studying preferences for policy instruments is a difficult task because sustainability problems involve a non-negligible degree of trade-offs and uncertainty. We therefore study the role of actors’ underlying ideologies (policy core beliefs) and risk attitudes in forming their preferences for different instruments.…
A typology of interdisciplinary collaborations: Insights From Agri-Food Transformation Research
To understand complex societal transformations, scholars have called for more interdisciplinary research in which researchers from various disciplines collaborate. To support the implementation of such collaborations, we introduce a novel typology of interdisciplinary collaborations developed from the literature and from structured reflection on our own research experience. The typology distinguishes (I) common base, (II) common destination, and …
Economics (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Public economics (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Positive economics (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Public relations (2 works) · Sustainability (2 works) · Agricultural Innovations and Practices (1 works) · Agriculture (1 works)