Shanna Nienaber
Biographic Data
| ID | 1574520 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Shanna Nienaber |
| GIVEN NAMES | Shanna |
| FAMILY NAME | Nienaber |
| SIGNATURE | NIENABER S |
| AFFILIATIONS | Council for Scientific and Industrial Research |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3119-6574 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 13 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The Roles of Experts and Expert‐Based Information in the Advocacy Coalition Framework: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations Based on the Acid Mine Drainage Case Study in Gauteng, South Africa
The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) remains one of the leading conceptual models in the policy sciences because it continues to be revised and updated as required. A focus area of the ACF that requires further theorization is the roles of experts and expert‐based information in influencing policy problem contexts. Our article takes a necessary step in this direction by (1) evaluating the usefulness of Weible’s expectations regarding the uses o…
Exploring the implications of critical complexity for the study of social-ecological systems
Audouin, M., R. Preiser, S. Nienaber, L. Downsborough, J. Lanz, and S. Mavengahama. 2013. Exploring the implications of critical complexity for the study of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 18(3): 12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05434-180312
Scientists as lobbyists? How science can make its voice heard in the South African policy‐making arena
This paper examines the complexity of the South African policy‐making context and its official and non‐official actors and investigates the challenges that scientists face when trying to exert their influence here in order to strengthen the science–policy interface. Based on this analysis, the paper makes preliminary recommendations on how scientists can venture to lobby policy‐makers in spite of the many obstacles they face. The main areas of in…
The Roles of Experts and Expert‐Based Information in the Advocacy Coalition Framework: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations Based on the Acid Mine Drainage Case Study in Gauteng, South Africa
The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) remains one of the leading conceptual models in the policy sciences because it continues to be revised and updated as required. A focus area of the ACF that requires further theorization is the roles of experts and expert‐based information in influencing policy problem contexts. Our article takes a necessary step in this direction by (1) evaluating the usefulness of Weible’s expectations regarding the uses o…
Exploring the implications of critical complexity for the study of social-ecological systems
Audouin, M., R. Preiser, S. Nienaber, L. Downsborough, J. Lanz, and S. Mavengahama. 2013. Exploring the implications of critical complexity for the study of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 18(3): 12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05434-180312
Scientists as lobbyists? How science can make its voice heard in the South African policy‐making arena
This paper examines the complexity of the South African policy‐making context and its official and non‐official actors and investigates the challenges that scientists face when trying to exert their influence here in order to strengthen the science–policy interface. Based on this analysis, the paper makes preliminary recommendations on how scientists can venture to lobby policy‐makers in spite of the many obstacles they face. The main areas of in…
Exploring the implications of critical complexity for the study of social-ecological systems
Audouin, M., R. Preiser, S. Nienaber, L. Downsborough, J. Lanz, and S. Mavengahama. 2013. Exploring the implications of critical complexity for the study of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 18(3): 12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05434-180312
The Roles of Experts and Expert‐Based Information in the Advocacy Coalition Framework: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations Based on the Acid Mine Drainage Case Study in Gauteng, South Africa
The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) remains one of the leading conceptual models in the policy sciences because it continues to be revised and updated as required. A focus area of the ACF that requires further theorization is the roles of experts and expert‐based information in influencing policy problem contexts. Our article takes a necessary step in this direction by (1) evaluating the usefulness of Weible’s expectations regarding the uses o…
Computer Science (2 works) · Context (archaeology (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Public relations (2 works) · Social science (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Advertising (1 works) · Biology (1 works) · Business (1 works) · Community Development and Social Impact (1 works)