Roger Z George
Biographic Data
| ID | 1599296 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Roger Z George |
| GIVEN NAMES | Roger Z |
| FAMILY NAME | George |
| SIGNATURE | GEORGE R Z |
| AFFILIATIONS | Georgetown University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2004 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
CIA’s evaluation of analytic quality
The CIA Directorate of Analysis (DA) has conducted post-production evaluations of its analytic assessments to measure and improve their quality since the 1980s. This paper will examine those efforts, conducted by small staffs, which developed criteria used to evaluate systemically the analytic strengths and weaknesses of products provided to senior policymakers. However, for decades these evaluations were regularly restricted and disseminated pri…
Assessing Futures Intelligence
IN THE FALL OF 1996, the U.S. National Intelligence Council (NIC) launched an initiative to identify and assess key global trends with an eye toward describing their impact on world politics, regional affairs, and U.S. security interests. The product of a series of meetings involving government and nongovernment experts, the forecast was initially intended for a limited audience. However, the report generated so much interest that it was distribu…
Intelligence in the National Security Enterprise
Professionalizing Intelligence Analysis
This article examines the current state of professionalism in national security intelligence analysis in the U.S. Government. Since the introduction of major intelligence reforms directed by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (IRTPA) in December, 2004, we have seen notable strides in many aspects of intelligence professionalization, including in analysis. But progress is halting, uneven, and by no means permanent. To consolidate…
Fixing the Problem of Analytical Mind-Sets
The main difference between professional scholars or intelligence officers on the one hand, and all other people on the other hand, is that the former are supposed to have had more training in the
Assessing Futures Intelligence
IN THE FALL OF 1996, the U.S. National Intelligence Council (NIC) launched an initiative to identify and assess key global trends with an eye toward describing their impact on world politics, regional affairs, and U.S. security interests. The product of a series of meetings involving government and nongovernment experts, the forecast was initially intended for a limited audience. However, the report generated so much interest that it was distribu…
Fixing the Problem of Analytical Mind-Sets
The main difference between professional scholars or intelligence officers on the one hand, and all other people on the other hand, is that the former are supposed to have had more training in the
Professionalizing Intelligence Analysis
This article examines the current state of professionalism in national security intelligence analysis in the U.S. Government. Since the introduction of major intelligence reforms directed by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (IRTPA) in December, 2004, we have seen notable strides in many aspects of intelligence professionalization, including in analysis. But progress is halting, uneven, and by no means permanent. To consolidate…
Intelligence in the National Security Enterprise
Assessing Futures Intelligence
IN THE FALL OF 1996, the U.S. National Intelligence Council (NIC) launched an initiative to identify and assess key global trends with an eye toward describing their impact on world politics, regional affairs, and U.S. security interests. The product of a series of meetings involving government and nongovernment experts, the forecast was initially intended for a limited audience. However, the report generated so much interest that it was distribu…
CIA’s evaluation of analytic quality
The CIA Directorate of Analysis (DA) has conducted post-production evaluations of its analytic assessments to measure and improve their quality since the 1980s. This paper will examine those efforts, conducted by small staffs, which developed criteria used to evaluate systemically the analytic strengths and weaknesses of products provided to senior policymakers. However, for decades these evaluations were regularly restricted and disseminated pri…
Political science (4 works) · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Law (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Public relations (2 works) · Art history (1 work) · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection (1 work) · Business (1 work) · Citation (1 work)