Roberto Marchionatti
Biographic Data
| ID | 1600823 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Roberto Marchionatti |
| GIVEN NAMES | Roberto |
| FAMILY NAME | Marchionatti |
| SIGNATURE | MARCHIONATTI R |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Turin |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 31 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1997 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Mauss'sThe Gift, or the necessity of an institutional perspective in economics
The article proposes a reading of Marcel Mauss's insights into gift exchange in primitive societies through the lens of the institutional economics approach. It thus tries to demonstrate that the gift as seen by Mauss can be interpreted as an institution arising from the self-transcendence of social relationships that gifts themselves are expressly designed to create and according to which individuals orient their behavior. On this basis, we prov…
Economics as Social Science
On Herbert Gintis's proposal 8.1 How to remedy scandalous pluralism of social sciences 8.2 The socio(bio)logy of homo socialis PART IV: The theoretical and practical relevance of Mauss's gift to development of a non-imperialist economics 9 The gift in social sciences 9.1 Jacques Derrida's philosophy of impossibility of (modern) gift 9.2 Alvin Gouldner's sociology: norm of reciprocity and principle of 'something for nothing' 9.3 On Mauss again: an…
On the cyclical variability of economic growth in Italy, 1881–1913
When Italian economics “Was Second to None”. Luigi Einaudi and the Turin School of Economics
The article is dedicated to the work of a group of economists that was an important expression of a fertile season of Italian economics, in the period from the mid-1890s to the end of 1930s, which developed around the figure of Luigi Einaudi, and earlier, around that of his master Cognetti de Martiis. This School expressed a range of thought of high value in the political and economic sphere. In the economic field, the School established a fertil…
Sraffa and the criticism of Marshall in the 1920s
On the Methodological Foundations of Modern Microeconomics
Research Article| March 01 2003 On the Methodological Foundations of Modern Microeconomics: Frank Knight and the "Cost Controversy" in the 1920s Roberto Marchionatti Roberto Marchionatti Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google History of Political Economy (2003) 35 (1): 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-35-1-49 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Roberto Marchionatti; On the Methodolog…
Piero Sraffa's Political Economy
A century after his birth, this volume presents a re-assessment of the life and work of Piero Sraffa, one of the great economists of the 20th-century. From his anti-Marshellian articles of 1925 and 1926 to his work on the theory of capital, Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, Sraffa's contribution to the study of economics is closely examined
Between Walras and Ricardo. Ladislaus von Bortkievicz and the origin of neo-ricardian theory
1. – Introduction Ladislaus von Bortkievicz, «by far the most eminent German statistician since Lexis» (Schumpeter 1932, p. 338), is known in the history of economic theory principally, as Schumpeter wrote, as «one of the most competent critics of Marx and Böhm-Bawerk» (Schumpeter, 1954, p. 851), – but it is also argued that «his essentially critical bent prevented him from producing, so far as economic theory is concerned, any creative work» (ib…
Pareto and Political Economy as a Science
It is argued that Joseph Schumpeter's widely accepted judgment that Pareto's work is 'completely rooted in Walras's system' constitutes a misreading of Pareto. In fact, already during the period 1892-1900, Pareto traces the methodological outlines of an economic science profoundly different from that of Walras. It is maintained that his methodological contribution represents an attempt to define the conditions for political economy to be a scienc…
Pareto and Political Economy as a Science
It is argued that Joseph Schumpeter's widely accepted judgment that Pareto's work is 'completely rooted in Walras's system' constitutes a misreading of Pareto. In fact, already during the period 1892-1900, Pareto traces the methodological outlines of an economic science profoundly different from that of Walras. It is maintained that his methodological contribution represents an attempt to define the conditions for political economy to be a scienc…
Piero Sraffa's Political Economy
A century after his birth, this volume presents a re-assessment of the life and work of Piero Sraffa, one of the great economists of the 20th-century. From his anti-Marshellian articles of 1925 and 1926 to his work on the theory of capital, Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, Sraffa's contribution to the study of economics is closely examined
Mauss'sThe Gift, or the necessity of an institutional perspective in economics
The article proposes a reading of Marcel Mauss's insights into gift exchange in primitive societies through the lens of the institutional economics approach. It thus tries to demonstrate that the gift as seen by Mauss can be interpreted as an institution arising from the self-transcendence of social relationships that gifts themselves are expressly designed to create and according to which individuals orient their behavior. On this basis, we prov…
When Italian economics “Was Second to None”. Luigi Einaudi and the Turin School of Economics
The article is dedicated to the work of a group of economists that was an important expression of a fertile season of Italian economics, in the period from the mid-1890s to the end of 1930s, which developed around the figure of Luigi Einaudi, and earlier, around that of his master Cognetti de Martiis. This School expressed a range of thought of high value in the political and economic sphere. In the economic field, the School established a fertil…
On the Methodological Foundations of Modern Microeconomics
Research Article| March 01 2003 On the Methodological Foundations of Modern Microeconomics: Frank Knight and the "Cost Controversy" in the 1920s Roberto Marchionatti Roberto Marchionatti Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google History of Political Economy (2003) 35 (1): 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-35-1-49 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Roberto Marchionatti; On the Methodolog…
Pareto and Political Economy as a Science
It is argued that Joseph Schumpeter's widely accepted judgment that Pareto's work is 'completely rooted in Walras's system' constitutes a misreading of Pareto. In fact, already during the period 1892-1900, Pareto traces the methodological outlines of an economic science profoundly different from that of Walras. It is maintained that his methodological contribution represents an attempt to define the conditions for political economy to be a scienc…
Piero Sraffa's Political Economy
A century after his birth, this volume presents a re-assessment of the life and work of Piero Sraffa, one of the great economists of the 20th-century. From his anti-Marshellian articles of 1925 and 1926 to his work on the theory of capital, Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, Sraffa's contribution to the study of economics is closely examined
Between Walras and Ricardo. Ladislaus von Bortkievicz and the origin of neo-ricardian theory
1. – Introduction Ladislaus von Bortkievicz, «by far the most eminent German statistician since Lexis» (Schumpeter 1932, p. 338), is known in the history of economic theory principally, as Schumpeter wrote, as «one of the most competent critics of Marx and Böhm-Bawerk» (Schumpeter, 1954, p. 851), – but it is also argued that «his essentially critical bent prevented him from producing, so far as economic theory is concerned, any creative work» (ib…
On the Methodological Foundations of Modern Microeconomics
Research Article| March 01 2003 On the Methodological Foundations of Modern Microeconomics: Frank Knight and the "Cost Controversy" in the 1920s Roberto Marchionatti Roberto Marchionatti Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google History of Political Economy (2003) 35 (1): 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-35-1-49 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Roberto Marchionatti; On the Methodolog…
Sraffa and the criticism of Marshall in the 1920s
On the cyclical variability of economic growth in Italy, 1881–1913
When Italian economics “Was Second to None”. Luigi Einaudi and the Turin School of Economics
The article is dedicated to the work of a group of economists that was an important expression of a fertile season of Italian economics, in the period from the mid-1890s to the end of 1930s, which developed around the figure of Luigi Einaudi, and earlier, around that of his master Cognetti de Martiis. This School expressed a range of thought of high value in the political and economic sphere. In the economic field, the School established a fertil…
Economics as Social Science
On Herbert Gintis's proposal 8.1 How to remedy scandalous pluralism of social sciences 8.2 The socio(bio)logy of homo socialis PART IV: The theoretical and practical relevance of Mauss's gift to development of a non-imperialist economics 9 The gift in social sciences 9.1 Jacques Derrida's philosophy of impossibility of (modern) gift 9.2 Alvin Gouldner's sociology: norm of reciprocity and principle of 'something for nothing' 9.3 On Mauss again: an…
Mauss'sThe Gift, or the necessity of an institutional perspective in economics
The article proposes a reading of Marcel Mauss's insights into gift exchange in primitive societies through the lens of the institutional economics approach. It thus tries to demonstrate that the gift as seen by Mauss can be interpreted as an institution arising from the self-transcendence of social relationships that gifts themselves are expressly designed to create and according to which individuals orient their behavior. On this basis, we prov…
Political Economy and Marxism (7 works) · Economic Theory and Institutions (6 works) · Economics (6 works) · Economic Theory and Policy (5 works) · Neoclassical economics (4 works) · Law (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Art (2 works)