Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Daniel Kisliakov

Biographic Data

ID1603235
NAMEDaniel Kisliakov
GIVEN NAMESDaniel
FAMILY NAMEKisliakov
SIGNATUREKISLIAKOV D
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Divinity
ORCID0000-0001-7942-4700
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX0
  • Lev Karsavin’s philosophy of personhood

    Open Access•Daniel Kisliakov•ARTICLE•Studies in East European Thought•2025•References: 4

  • Independence of thought and national sentiment in the Russian Religious Renaissance

    Open Access•Daniel Kisliakov•ARTICLE•Studies in East European Thought•2024•References: 2

  • Sergius Bulgakov and his “neo-patristic” lens

    Open Access•Daniel Kisliakov•ARTICLE•Studies in East European Thought•2023

  • Two responses to the “Sophia Affair” and Bulgakov’s theology of authority

    Open Access•Daniel Kisliakov•ARTICLE•Studies in East European Thought•2023•References: 1

  • Nicholas Afanasiev and his neo-patristic approach

    Open Access•Daniel Kisliakov•ARTICLE•Studies in East European Thought•2023

  • Nicholas Afanasiev's Concept of Eucharistic Ecclesiology and Its Theological Impact

    Daniel Kisliakov•ARTICLE•Journal of ecumenical studies•2022

    precis: A productive area of scholarship of the Russian Religious Renaissance is the reconsideration of the "two schools" dichotomy that has been broadly thought of as an explanation of its development. A better way to approach its study, however, is in a comprehensive way capturing critical details that escape the attention of crude categorizations. An aspect in which this is relevant is the development of the notion of eucharistic ecclesiology.…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Nicholas Afanasiev's Concept of Eucharistic Ecclesiology and Its Theological Impact

    Daniel Kisliakov•ARTICLE•Journal of ecumenical studies•2022

    precis: A productive area of scholarship of the Russian Religious Renaissance is the reconsideration of the "two schools" dichotomy that has been broadly thought of as an explanation of its development. A better way to approach its study, however, is in a comprehensive way capturing critical details that escape the attention of crude categorizations. An aspect in which this is relevant is the development of the notion of eucharistic ecclesiology.…

  • Sergius Bulgakov and his “neo-patristic” lens

    Open Access•Daniel Kisliakov•ARTICLE•Studies in East European Thought•2023

  • Two responses to the “Sophia Affair” and Bulgakov’s theology of authority

    Open Access•Daniel Kisliakov•ARTICLE•Studies in East European Thought•2023•References: 1

  • Nicholas Afanasiev and his neo-patristic approach

    Open Access•Daniel Kisliakov•ARTICLE•Studies in East European Thought•2023

  • Independence of thought and national sentiment in the Russian Religious Renaissance

    Open Access•Daniel Kisliakov•ARTICLE•Studies in East European Thought•2024•References: 2

  • Lev Karsavin’s philosophy of personhood

    Open Access•Daniel Kisliakov•ARTICLE•Studies in East European Thought•2025•References: 4

Philosophy (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Theology (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Art history (3 works) · Ecclesiology (3 works) · History (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae