Elazar Weinryb
Biographic Data
| ID | 1612807 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Elazar Weinryb |
| GIVEN NAMES | Elazar |
| FAMILY NAME | Weinryb |
| SIGNATURE | WEINRYB E |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1975 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1980 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Omissions and Responsibility
Journal Article Omissions and Responsibility Get access Elazar Weinryb Elazar Weinryb Everyman's University, Tel Aviv Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 30, Issue 118, January 1980, Pages 1–18, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219377 Published: 01 January 1980
Construction vs. Discovery in History
Critique des arguments de J. W. Meiland, Skepticism and Historical Knowledge (New York, Randons House, 1965) en faveur du scepticisme historique. Le constructionniste ne peut etre de maniere consistante le type de sceptique qu'il veut etre
The Justification of a Causal Thesis
Morton White has criticized simple-minded regularists for supposing that all the regularity theory amounts to is the assumption that a singular causal statement must imply the generalization corresponding to it.' This crude regularism, he says, is sometimes presupposed even by historians. There are some historians who try to refute causal statements of their colleagues merely by advancing counter-examples to the immediate generalizations correspo…
Omissions and Responsibility
Journal Article Omissions and Responsibility Get access Elazar Weinryb Elazar Weinryb Everyman's University, Tel Aviv Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 30, Issue 118, January 1980, Pages 1–18, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219377 Published: 01 January 1980
The Justification of a Causal Thesis
Morton White has criticized simple-minded regularists for supposing that all the regularity theory amounts to is the assumption that a singular causal statement must imply the generalization corresponding to it.' This crude regularism, he says, is sometimes presupposed even by historians. There are some historians who try to refute causal statements of their colleagues merely by advancing counter-examples to the immediate generalizations correspo…
The Justification of a Causal Thesis
Morton White has criticized simple-minded regularists for supposing that all the regularity theory amounts to is the assumption that a singular causal statement must imply the generalization corresponding to it.' This crude regularism, he says, is sometimes presupposed even by historians. There are some historians who try to refute causal statements of their colleagues merely by advancing counter-examples to the immediate generalizations correspo…
Construction vs. Discovery in History
Critique des arguments de J. W. Meiland, Skepticism and Historical Knowledge (New York, Randons House, 1965) en faveur du scepticisme historique. Le constructionniste ne peut etre de maniere consistante le type de sceptique qu'il veut etre
Omissions and Responsibility
Journal Article Omissions and Responsibility Get access Elazar Weinryb Elazar Weinryb Everyman's University, Tel Aviv Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 30, Issue 118, January 1980, Pages 1–18, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219377 Published: 01 January 1980
Computer Science (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Causal analysis (1 work) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 work) · Classics (1 work) · Economics (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · Global Peace and Security Dynamics (1 work) · Historical and Literary Studies (1 work) · Historical Philosophy and Science (1 work)