Andreas Tjernshaugen
Biographic Data
| ID | 1616369 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Andreas Tjernshaugen |
| GIVEN NAMES | Andreas |
| FAMILY NAME | Tjernshaugen |
| SIGNATURE | TJERNSHAUGEN A |
| AFFILIATIONS | a CICERO , Center for International Climate and Environmental Research , Oslo , Norway |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 13 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2012 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Technological Power as a Strategic Dilemma
This article offers a comparative analysis of the emergence of CO 2 capture and storage (CCS) activities and strategies in three multinational oil and gas companies. Exxon/ExxonMobil was first to make plans for a major, pioneering CCS project, but later pursued a relatively cautious strategy. In contrast, BP showed little interest in CCS up until 1997, but from that point on developed a particularly ambitious strategy. Statoil, meanwhile, has bee…
The growth of political support for CO2capture and storage in Norway
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has enjoyed stronger political support in Norway than in other countries. Early CCS initiatives were motivated by the challenge of reconciling relatively ambitious climate policy targets with growing emissions from Norway's offshore oil and gas operations, whose expertise and project opportunities formed the basis for these initiatives. The early start of the CCS debate created political path dependence effects, i…
Future U.S. Climate Policy
What is the outlook for engaging the United States in international cooperation to mitigate climate change? The question is crucial, as any global effort to curb global warming will be unsatisfactory without U.S. participation. It is also a pressing question for Kyoto party countries, currently at a loss regarding how to re-engage the U.S. We discuss the constellations of domestic pressure factors that influence policy outcome in favor of or agai…
Technological Power as a Strategic Dilemma
This article offers a comparative analysis of the emergence of CO 2 capture and storage (CCS) activities and strategies in three multinational oil and gas companies. Exxon/ExxonMobil was first to make plans for a major, pioneering CCS project, but later pursued a relatively cautious strategy. In contrast, BP showed little interest in CCS up until 1997, but from that point on developed a particularly ambitious strategy. Statoil, meanwhile, has bee…
The growth of political support for CO2capture and storage in Norway
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has enjoyed stronger political support in Norway than in other countries. Early CCS initiatives were motivated by the challenge of reconciling relatively ambitious climate policy targets with growing emissions from Norway's offshore oil and gas operations, whose expertise and project opportunities formed the basis for these initiatives. The early start of the CCS debate created political path dependence effects, i…
Future U.S. Climate Policy
What is the outlook for engaging the United States in international cooperation to mitigate climate change? The question is crucial, as any global effort to curb global warming will be unsatisfactory without U.S. participation. It is also a pressing question for Kyoto party countries, currently at a loss regarding how to re-engage the U.S. We discuss the constellations of domestic pressure factors that influence policy outcome in favor of or agai…
Future U.S. Climate Policy
What is the outlook for engaging the United States in international cooperation to mitigate climate change? The question is crucial, as any global effort to curb global warming will be unsatisfactory without U.S. participation. It is also a pressing question for Kyoto party countries, currently at a loss regarding how to re-engage the U.S. We discuss the constellations of domestic pressure factors that influence policy outcome in favor of or agai…
The growth of political support for CO2capture and storage in Norway
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has enjoyed stronger political support in Norway than in other countries. Early CCS initiatives were motivated by the challenge of reconciling relatively ambitious climate policy targets with growing emissions from Norway's offshore oil and gas operations, whose expertise and project opportunities formed the basis for these initiatives. The early start of the CCS debate created political path dependence effects, i…
Technological Power as a Strategic Dilemma
This article offers a comparative analysis of the emergence of CO 2 capture and storage (CCS) activities and strategies in three multinational oil and gas companies. Exxon/ExxonMobil was first to make plans for a major, pioneering CCS project, but later pursued a relatively cautious strategy. In contrast, BP showed little interest in CCS up until 1997, but from that point on developed a particularly ambitious strategy. Statoil, meanwhile, has bee…
Climate change (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Business (2 works) · Economics (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Fossil fuel (2 works) · Policy Transfer and Learning (2 works) · Political economy (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (2 works)