D Justin Coates
Biographic Data
| ID | 1629039 |
|---|---|
| NAME | D Justin Coates |
| GIVEN NAMES | D Justin |
| FAMILY NAME | Coates |
| SIGNATURE | COATES D J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Houston |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6093-787X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 10 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2012 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
A Defense of Weak Moralism: A Reply to Sher
In Praise of Ambivalence
Ambivalence is a form of inner volitional conflict that we experience as being irresolvable without significant cost. Because of this, very few of us relish feelings of ambivalence. Yet for many in the Western philosophical tradition, ambivalence is not simply an unappealing experience that’s hard to manage. According to the unificationists, ambivalence is a failure of well-functioning agency. The reasons for this, we’re told, are threefold. Firs…
Ambivalence: A Philosophical Exploration
Ambivalence: A Philosophical Exploration Ambivalence: A Philosophical Exploration. By Razinsky Hili. (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2017. Pp. ix + 285. Price £85.) D Justin Coates D Justin Coates Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 71, Issue 4, October 2021, pqaa087, https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqaa087 Published: 11 January 2021
A Wholehearted Defense of Ambivalence
An Actual-Sequence Theory of Promotion
No abstract
The Nature and Ethics of Blame
Blame is usually discussed in the context of the free will problem, but recently moral philosophers have begun to examine it on its own terms. If, as many suppose, free will is to be understood as the control relevant to moral responsibility, and moral responsibility is to be understood in terms of whether blame is appropriate, then an independent inquiry into the nature and ethics of blame will be essential to solving (and, perhaps, even fully u…
The Nature and Ethics of Blame
Blame is usually discussed in the context of the free will problem, but recently moral philosophers have begun to examine it on its own terms. If, as many suppose, free will is to be understood as the control relevant to moral responsibility, and moral responsibility is to be understood in terms of whether blame is appropriate, then an independent inquiry into the nature and ethics of blame will be essential to solving (and, perhaps, even fully u…
In Praise of Ambivalence
Ambivalence is a form of inner volitional conflict that we experience as being irresolvable without significant cost. Because of this, very few of us relish feelings of ambivalence. Yet for many in the Western philosophical tradition, ambivalence is not simply an unappealing experience that’s hard to manage. According to the unificationists, ambivalence is a failure of well-functioning agency. The reasons for this, we’re told, are threefold. Firs…
A Wholehearted Defense of Ambivalence
The Nature and Ethics of Blame
Blame is usually discussed in the context of the free will problem, but recently moral philosophers have begun to examine it on its own terms. If, as many suppose, free will is to be understood as the control relevant to moral responsibility, and moral responsibility is to be understood in terms of whether blame is appropriate, then an independent inquiry into the nature and ethics of blame will be essential to solving (and, perhaps, even fully u…
An Actual-Sequence Theory of Promotion
No abstract
A Wholehearted Defense of Ambivalence
Ambivalence: A Philosophical Exploration
Ambivalence: A Philosophical Exploration Ambivalence: A Philosophical Exploration. By Razinsky Hili. (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2017. Pp. ix + 285. Price £85.) D Justin Coates D Justin Coates Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 71, Issue 4, October 2021, pqaa087, https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqaa087 Published: 11 January 2021
In Praise of Ambivalence
Ambivalence is a form of inner volitional conflict that we experience as being irresolvable without significant cost. Because of this, very few of us relish feelings of ambivalence. Yet for many in the Western philosophical tradition, ambivalence is not simply an unappealing experience that’s hard to manage. According to the unificationists, ambivalence is a failure of well-functioning agency. The reasons for this, we’re told, are threefold. Firs…
A Defense of Weak Moralism: A Reply to Sher
Epistemology (6 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Ambivalence (3 works) · Free Will and Agency (3 works) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 works) · Agency (philosophy (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works)