Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

William M Austin

Biographic Data

ID164128
NAMEWilliam M Austin
GIVEN NAMESWilliam M
FAMILY NAMEAustin
SIGNATUREAUSTIN W M
AFFILIATIONSIllinois Institute of Technology
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS16
TOTAL CITATIONS7
AUTHOR COUNT16
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1937
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1970
H-INDEX1
  • Linguistics

    Open Access•William M Austin•ARTICLE•American Anthropologist•1970

  • Some social aspects of paralanguage

    Open Access•William M Austin•ARTICLE•The Canadian Journal of…•1965

    The term ‘paralanguage’ and the corresponding adjective ‘paralinguistic’ are less than ten years old but already they loom large in the study of animal communication. In one sense all non-language communications (kinesics, haptics, as well as “vocalization”) are paralinguistic but this term is now almost exclusively applied to significant, non-linguistic noises made with the vocal tract. Observations of these phenomena are of course quite old. De…

  • Mongol Reader

    Nicholas Poppe, William M Austin et al.•ARTICLE•The Slavic and East European…•1965

  • Mongol Reader

    William M Austin, John G Hangin et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of the American Oriental…•1964

  • Germanic Reflexes of Indo-European -Hy- and -Hw

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1958

    [Proto-IE - Hy - and - Hw - (where H was either a glottal spirant [h] or a glottal stop [q]) resulted in PGmc. - qy - and - qw -. This phoneme /q/, of limited distribution and duration, fell together with /g/ in East Germanic, with /k/ and /g/ in North Germanic, and with /k/ and /y, w/ in West Germanic]

  • The Language of the Secret History of the Mongols

    William M Austin, John Charles Street•ARTICLE•Language•1958•Cited by: 5

  • An Introduction to Classical (Literary) Mongolian

    Nicholas Poppe, Kaare Gro̵nbech et al.•ARTICLE•Oriens•1957

  • Criteria for Phonetic Similarity

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1957

    The classical definition of the phoneme runs something like this: a set of sounds in complementary (noncontrastive) distribution and phonetically similar. To this one may append Trager's statement, ‘The criterion of complementary versus contrasting distribution is first, then that of phonetic similarity.‘ While it may be generally admitted that the criterion of phonetic similarity is of secondary importance, the question can be raised: is it of a…

  • Turkic Peoples of the USSR

    William M Austin, Stefan Wurm•ARTICLE•Pacific Affairs•1955

  • A Corollary to the Germanic Verschärfung

    Open Access•William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1946

    [An IH laryngeal with a following semivowel became IE hy and hw , which in turn, under certain accentual conditions here described, became Gmc. k; e.g. NE quick : Lat. vīvus , Skt. jīvas.]

  • The Scientific Method and Historical Linguistics

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Journal of the American Oriental…•1945•Cited by: 1

  • Is Armenian an Anatolian Language

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1942

    [Armenian, like Hittite, Luwian, and Lycian, retains the third laryngeal initially, and has no inherited long vowels, no palatal-velar distinction, and no feminine gender. These and other archaisms lead to the conclusion that Armenian is an Anatolian language and can be compared to more advantage with Lycian and Hittite than with the IE languages proper.]

  • The Prothetic Vowel in Greek

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1941•Cited by: 1

    [The so-called prothetic vowel in Greek finds its ultimate explanation in Indo-Hittite. In Indo-Hittite bases beginning with the first, third, or fourth laryngeal, the first syllable was retained everywhere if it was in the full grade. If it was in the reduced grade, it was lost everywhere except in Hittite, Greek, and Armenian. If the second consonant was w, the first three laryngeals could unite with it to form a long voiceless hw which appears…

  • The Etymology of English big

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1939

    No convincing or satisfactory etymology has as yet been suggested for the English word big. Skeat properly compares it with the Norwegian bugge ‘strong man’ and says that it is probably a borrowing from Scandinavian. He further hazards a connection with NE bow, Goth, biugan, from PG *beugan, and there lets the matter rest. Webster's New International Dictionary connects it with bug and Puck, originally ‘hobgoblin, spectre’, and suggests a further…

  • Sanskrit parśu and paraśu

    William M Austin, Henry Lee Smith•ARTICLE•Journal of the American Oriental…•1937

  • The Etymology of Hittite yukas

    William M Austin, Henry Lee Smith•ARTICLE•Language•1937

    Sturtevant in HG 144, speaking of relatively transparent nouncompounds in Hittite, goes on to say ‘One may be almost equally sure that tayukas (ta-a-i-ú-ga-aš, da-a-i-ú-ga-aš, ta-a-ú-ga-aš) ‘two years old’ beside yukas (i-ú-ga-aš) ‘one year old’ is a compound whose prior member is akin to tan (ta-a-an, da-a-an) ‘iterum, second’; but our ignorance of the etymology of the second member makes its classification impossible'. This article is an attemp…

  • The Language of the Secret History of the Mongols

    William M Austin, John Charles Street•ARTICLE•Language•1958•Cited by: 5

  • The Scientific Method and Historical Linguistics

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Journal of the American Oriental…•1945•Cited by: 1

  • The Prothetic Vowel in Greek

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1941•Cited by: 1

    [The so-called prothetic vowel in Greek finds its ultimate explanation in Indo-Hittite. In Indo-Hittite bases beginning with the first, third, or fourth laryngeal, the first syllable was retained everywhere if it was in the full grade. If it was in the reduced grade, it was lost everywhere except in Hittite, Greek, and Armenian. If the second consonant was w, the first three laryngeals could unite with it to form a long voiceless hw which appears…

  • Sanskrit parśu and paraśu

    William M Austin, Henry Lee Smith•ARTICLE•Journal of the American Oriental…•1937

  • The Etymology of Hittite yukas

    William M Austin, Henry Lee Smith•ARTICLE•Language•1937

    Sturtevant in HG 144, speaking of relatively transparent nouncompounds in Hittite, goes on to say ‘One may be almost equally sure that tayukas (ta-a-i-ú-ga-aš, da-a-i-ú-ga-aš, ta-a-ú-ga-aš) ‘two years old’ beside yukas (i-ú-ga-aš) ‘one year old’ is a compound whose prior member is akin to tan (ta-a-an, da-a-an) ‘iterum, second’; but our ignorance of the etymology of the second member makes its classification impossible'. This article is an attemp…

  • The Etymology of English big

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1939

    No convincing or satisfactory etymology has as yet been suggested for the English word big. Skeat properly compares it with the Norwegian bugge ‘strong man’ and says that it is probably a borrowing from Scandinavian. He further hazards a connection with NE bow, Goth, biugan, from PG *beugan, and there lets the matter rest. Webster's New International Dictionary connects it with bug and Puck, originally ‘hobgoblin, spectre’, and suggests a further…

  • The Prothetic Vowel in Greek

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1941•Cited by: 1

    [The so-called prothetic vowel in Greek finds its ultimate explanation in Indo-Hittite. In Indo-Hittite bases beginning with the first, third, or fourth laryngeal, the first syllable was retained everywhere if it was in the full grade. If it was in the reduced grade, it was lost everywhere except in Hittite, Greek, and Armenian. If the second consonant was w, the first three laryngeals could unite with it to form a long voiceless hw which appears…

  • Is Armenian an Anatolian Language

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1942

    [Armenian, like Hittite, Luwian, and Lycian, retains the third laryngeal initially, and has no inherited long vowels, no palatal-velar distinction, and no feminine gender. These and other archaisms lead to the conclusion that Armenian is an Anatolian language and can be compared to more advantage with Lycian and Hittite than with the IE languages proper.]

  • The Scientific Method and Historical Linguistics

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Journal of the American Oriental…•1945•Cited by: 1

  • A Corollary to the Germanic Verschärfung

    Open Access•William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1946

    [An IH laryngeal with a following semivowel became IE hy and hw , which in turn, under certain accentual conditions here described, became Gmc. k; e.g. NE quick : Lat. vīvus , Skt. jīvas.]

  • Turkic Peoples of the USSR

    William M Austin, Stefan Wurm•ARTICLE•Pacific Affairs•1955

  • An Introduction to Classical (Literary) Mongolian

    Nicholas Poppe, Kaare Gro̵nbech et al.•ARTICLE•Oriens•1957

  • Criteria for Phonetic Similarity

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1957

    The classical definition of the phoneme runs something like this: a set of sounds in complementary (noncontrastive) distribution and phonetically similar. To this one may append Trager's statement, ‘The criterion of complementary versus contrasting distribution is first, then that of phonetic similarity.‘ While it may be generally admitted that the criterion of phonetic similarity is of secondary importance, the question can be raised: is it of a…

  • Germanic Reflexes of Indo-European -Hy- and -Hw

    William M Austin•ARTICLE•Language•1958

    [Proto-IE - Hy - and - Hw - (where H was either a glottal spirant [h] or a glottal stop [q]) resulted in PGmc. - qy - and - qw -. This phoneme /q/, of limited distribution and duration, fell together with /g/ in East Germanic, with /k/ and /g/ in North Germanic, and with /k/ and /y, w/ in West Germanic]

  • The Language of the Secret History of the Mongols

    William M Austin, John Charles Street•ARTICLE•Language•1958•Cited by: 5

  • Mongol Reader

    William M Austin, John G Hangin et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of the American Oriental…•1964

  • Some social aspects of paralanguage

    Open Access•William M Austin•ARTICLE•The Canadian Journal of…•1965

    The term ‘paralanguage’ and the corresponding adjective ‘paralinguistic’ are less than ten years old but already they loom large in the study of animal communication. In one sense all non-language communications (kinesics, haptics, as well as “vocalization”) are paralinguistic but this term is now almost exclusively applied to significant, non-linguistic noises made with the vocal tract. Observations of these phenomena are of course quite old. De…

  • Mongol Reader

    Nicholas Poppe, William M Austin et al.•ARTICLE•The Slavic and East European…•1965

  • Linguistics

    Open Access•William M Austin•ARTICLE•American Anthropologist•1970

Philosophy (12 works) · History (11 works) · Linguistics (11 works) · Linguistics and Cultural Studies (9 works) · Linguistics and language evolution (8 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Eurasian Exchange Networks (4 works) · Ancient history (3 works) · History (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae