Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jan Angstrom

Biographic Data

ID1667510
NAMEJan Angstrom
GIVEN NAMESJan
FAMILY NAMEAngstrom
SIGNATUREANGSTROM J
AFFILIATIONSSwedish Defence University
ORCID0000-0001-8722-0134
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS21
TOTAL CITATIONS41
WORKS AS AUTHOR21
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2000
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX3
  • Explaining disciplinary heterogeneity in Nordic War/Military Studies

    Open Access•Jan Angstrom, David Larsson Gebre-Medhin•ARTICLE•Cooperation and Conflict•2025•References: 11

    How should the diversity of Nordic War/Military Studies be explained? Despite having experienced similar external shocks to international security since the end of the Cold War, and notwithstanding their relative cultural homogeneity, university environments throughout the Nordic states have developed diverging conceptualizations of War/Military Studies. We demonstrate that this variation can be explained in terms of supply and demand factors in …

  • Unpacking the varying strategic logics of total defence

    Open Access•Jan Angstrom, Kristin Ljungkvist•ARTICLE•Journal of Strategic Studies•2024•References: 25

    What is the strategic logic of so-called 'total defence'? At first glance, total defence may appear as one coherent strategic concept. Indeed, it was predominantly small, non-aligned states that pursued total defence during the Cold War. In this article, however, we demonstrate that depending on how 'total war' is understood, there are subsequently different strategic logics ingrained in total defence. We show this by developing a typology of dif…

  • Contribution Warfare

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•The US Army War College Quarterly…•2020

  • Weak party escalation

    Jan Angstrom, Magnus Petersson•ARTICLE•Journal of Strategic Studies•2019•References: 28

    In this article, we develop the strategic rationale behind weak party escalation against stronger adversaries. There are, we suggest, four main strategies: to provoke a desired over-reaction from the stronger adversary; to compartmentalize conflict within a domain in which the weak party has advantages; to carve a niche with a stronger ally, and to forge a reputation of not yielding lightly. Spelling out these different logics contributes to the …

  • The US perspective on future war

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Defence Studies•2018•Cited by: 3•References: 16

    This article addresses why the US in its military operations tends to focus on only one dimension in war – the military narrowly understood. More precisely, in the US case, its armed forces tend to be preoccupied with platforms and understand military capabilities as those that deliver death and destruction. I explain this one-sided understanding of the military dimension in war with how the US armed forces think about future war. How the US unde…

  • Why small states join big wars

    Open Access•Erik Noreen, Roxanna Sjöstedt et al.•ARTICLE•International Relations•2017

    The security behavior of small states has traditionally been explained by different takes of realism, liberalism, or constructivism - focusing on the behavior that aims toward safeguarding sovereignty or engaging in peace policies. The issue of why states with limited military capacities and little or no military alignments or engagements decide to participate in an international mission has received limited attention by previous research. In con…

  • Escalation, Emulation, and the Failure of Hybrid Warfare in Afghanistan

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Studies in Conflict and Terrorism•2016•Cited by: 1

    In this article, I argue that hybridization is a contingent result of the dynamics of some conflicts but not others. In particular, faced with opponents with great power, weaker powers seek a situation of asymmetry to gain victory. Drawing on within-case analysis of the conduct of war during the past thirty years in Afghanistan, I demonstrate that what we now consider to be “hybrid” represents an important continuity and strategic option in Afgha…

  • Religion or reason? exploring alternative ways to measure the quality of doctrine

    Jan Angstrom, J J Widen et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Strategic Studies•2016•Cited by: 4•References: 15

    In this article, we address the often ignored issue of quality standards for doctrine. In doing so, we contribute to the existing literature on military doctrine, since much of previous research has focused on outlining the effects of doctrine or the causes of particular doctrinal content, rather than how we should measure its quality. The predominant way of understanding quality of doctrine is based on the rationalist understanding of doctrine a…

  • State theory and statebuilding

    Jan Angstrom•CHAPTER•New Agendas in Statebuilding•2013

    On 22 June 2011 President Barack Obama decided to begin the withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan. By September 2012 just over 30,000 of the roughly 100,000 US soldiers in Afghanistan will have rotated home. Over the coming years US forces will gradually continue the withdrawal and, according to the current plan, all Western forces are supposed to have left Afghanistan by the end of 2014 after a more than a decade- long intervention. The decis…

  • The changing norms of civil and military and civil-military relations theory

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2013•Cited by: 3•References: 23

    The dichotomy between civil and military is well-established in international political practice. International law, international order, and war are but some of the institutions that rely upon making a distinction between civil and military. The distinction, arguably, is also central for analyses of conflicts worldwide. Almost daily, we are fed stories of atrocities against civilians in conflict-ridden parts of the world. In academic discourse, …

  • Adopting a Recipe for Success

    Jan Angstrom, J J Widen et al.•ARTICLE•Comparative Strategy•2012

    The prevailing explanation of the institutionalization of the principles of war is misleading. Although the introduction of the principles into Western doctrine coincided with total war and the need to train unprecedented numbers of soldiers and junior officers in tactics, the fact that the principles disappeared from doctrines immediately prior to and during the Second World War suggests that they were not institutionalized to meet an increased …

  • Regaining Strategy

    Jan Angstrom, Jan Willem Honig•ARTICLE•Journal of Strategic Studies•2012•Cited by: 3•References: 27

    In Western operations in Afghanistan, small European powers escalate in different ways. While Denmark and the Netherlands have contributed to Western escalation through integration with British and US forces, Norway and Sweden have done so by creating a division of labour allowing US and British combat forces to concentrate their efforts in the south. These variations in strategic behaviour suggest that the strategic choice of small powers is mor…

  • Mapping the Competing Historical Analogies of the War on Terrorism

    Open Access•Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•International Relations•2011•Cited by: 6

    This article maps the historical analogies of the war on terrorism used by the Bush administration. It identifies four historical analogies of the war on terrorism present in the US political and academic discourse since the attacks on 11 September 2001. These are the war on terrorism as: (a) the Second World War; (b) the Crusades; (c) the Vietnam War; and (d) the Cold War. These analogies have been a constant presence in the US discourse, althou…

  • Inviting the Leviathan

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2008•Cited by: 3•References: 29

    This article examines the role of intervening forces in state-building efforts after state-collapse and civil wars. Based upon a case study from the 30 years of war in Afghanistan, it develops an explanation for failure of state-building attempts drawing upon bargaining theory, macrosociological state-building theory, and strategic thought. The explanation suggests that international state-building attempts condition and shapes a new strategic en…

  • Introduction

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2008•Cited by: 2•References: 3

    What is the utility of force in modern conflict? This article introduce the overall puzzle of this special issue of Small Wars and Insurgencies. In doing so, it identifies some trends in the development of strategic thought since the end of the cold war. By elaborating on some of the paradoxes of modern military power and the use of force, it also provides a more detailed outline of the articles in this issue

  • Survival of the Most Cited? Small Political Science Communities and International Influence

    Open Access•Jan Angstrom, Erik Hedenström et al.•ARTICLE•European Political Science•2003•Cited by: 3

    Can small scholarly communities, such as the Swedish political science community, survive in an academic world often said to be dominated not only by American research but also by American concerns? Does the political science profession in Sweden, a small country with a rather odd (!) language, few political science departments, and few members of the national political science association, have a unique independent Swedish identity - or is curre…

  • Towards a typology of internal armed conflict

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Civil Wars•2001•Cited by: 3•References: 41

    The rejuvenated study of internal armed conflict after the Cold War has been plagued with conceptual turmoil. This article argues that this lack of consensus can be explained by the variable nature of the topic itself and that the topic has fallen between disciplinary boundaries. The lack of consensus itself can have damaging effects on our understanding of internal armed conflict. The article therefore outlines a suggested, partly modified, typo…

  • The International Dimensions of Ethnic Conflict

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Studies in Conflict and Terrorism•2001•Cited by: 1

  • The International Dimensions of Ethnic Conflict

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Studies in Conflict and Terrorism•2001•Cited by: 5•References: 7

    (2001). The International Dimensions of Ethnic Conflict. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism: Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 59-69

  • Evaluating realist explanations of internal conflict

    Jan Angstrom, Isabelle Duyvesteyn•ARTICLE•Security Studies•2001•Cited by: 2•References: 29

    (2001). Evaluating realist explanations of internal conflict: The case of Liberia. Security Studies: Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 186-218

  • The sociology of studies of ethnic conflict

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Civil Wars•2000•Cited by: 2•References: 46

    Is security a pre‐condition for development or is development a precondition for security? Since World War II, scholars studying ethnic conflict have answered this question differently. In reviewing the literature on development and ethnic conflict, this article introduces ideas derived from the sociology of science to explain the lack of consensus. Accordingly, the article suggests that this variation should not be understood as a reflection of …

  • Mapping the Competing Historical Analogies of the War on Terrorism

    Open Access•Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•International Relations•2011•Cited by: 6

    This article maps the historical analogies of the war on terrorism used by the Bush administration. It identifies four historical analogies of the war on terrorism present in the US political and academic discourse since the attacks on 11 September 2001. These are the war on terrorism as: (a) the Second World War; (b) the Crusades; (c) the Vietnam War; and (d) the Cold War. These analogies have been a constant presence in the US discourse, althou…

  • The International Dimensions of Ethnic Conflict

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Studies in Conflict and Terrorism•2001•Cited by: 5•References: 7

    (2001). The International Dimensions of Ethnic Conflict. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism: Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 59-69

  • Religion or reason? exploring alternative ways to measure the quality of doctrine

    Jan Angstrom, J J Widen et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Strategic Studies•2016•Cited by: 4•References: 15

    In this article, we address the often ignored issue of quality standards for doctrine. In doing so, we contribute to the existing literature on military doctrine, since much of previous research has focused on outlining the effects of doctrine or the causes of particular doctrinal content, rather than how we should measure its quality. The predominant way of understanding quality of doctrine is based on the rationalist understanding of doctrine a…

  • The US perspective on future war

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Defence Studies•2018•Cited by: 3•References: 16

    This article addresses why the US in its military operations tends to focus on only one dimension in war – the military narrowly understood. More precisely, in the US case, its armed forces tend to be preoccupied with platforms and understand military capabilities as those that deliver death and destruction. I explain this one-sided understanding of the military dimension in war with how the US armed forces think about future war. How the US unde…

  • The changing norms of civil and military and civil-military relations theory

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2013•Cited by: 3•References: 23

    The dichotomy between civil and military is well-established in international political practice. International law, international order, and war are but some of the institutions that rely upon making a distinction between civil and military. The distinction, arguably, is also central for analyses of conflicts worldwide. Almost daily, we are fed stories of atrocities against civilians in conflict-ridden parts of the world. In academic discourse, …

  • Regaining Strategy

    Jan Angstrom, Jan Willem Honig•ARTICLE•Journal of Strategic Studies•2012•Cited by: 3•References: 27

    In Western operations in Afghanistan, small European powers escalate in different ways. While Denmark and the Netherlands have contributed to Western escalation through integration with British and US forces, Norway and Sweden have done so by creating a division of labour allowing US and British combat forces to concentrate their efforts in the south. These variations in strategic behaviour suggest that the strategic choice of small powers is mor…

  • Inviting the Leviathan

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2008•Cited by: 3•References: 29

    This article examines the role of intervening forces in state-building efforts after state-collapse and civil wars. Based upon a case study from the 30 years of war in Afghanistan, it develops an explanation for failure of state-building attempts drawing upon bargaining theory, macrosociological state-building theory, and strategic thought. The explanation suggests that international state-building attempts condition and shapes a new strategic en…

  • Survival of the Most Cited? Small Political Science Communities and International Influence

    Open Access•Jan Angstrom, Erik Hedenström et al.•ARTICLE•European Political Science•2003•Cited by: 3

    Can small scholarly communities, such as the Swedish political science community, survive in an academic world often said to be dominated not only by American research but also by American concerns? Does the political science profession in Sweden, a small country with a rather odd (!) language, few political science departments, and few members of the national political science association, have a unique independent Swedish identity - or is curre…

  • Towards a typology of internal armed conflict

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Civil Wars•2001•Cited by: 3•References: 41

    The rejuvenated study of internal armed conflict after the Cold War has been plagued with conceptual turmoil. This article argues that this lack of consensus can be explained by the variable nature of the topic itself and that the topic has fallen between disciplinary boundaries. The lack of consensus itself can have damaging effects on our understanding of internal armed conflict. The article therefore outlines a suggested, partly modified, typo…

  • Introduction

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2008•Cited by: 2•References: 3

    What is the utility of force in modern conflict? This article introduce the overall puzzle of this special issue of Small Wars and Insurgencies. In doing so, it identifies some trends in the development of strategic thought since the end of the cold war. By elaborating on some of the paradoxes of modern military power and the use of force, it also provides a more detailed outline of the articles in this issue

  • Evaluating realist explanations of internal conflict

    Jan Angstrom, Isabelle Duyvesteyn•ARTICLE•Security Studies•2001•Cited by: 2•References: 29

    (2001). Evaluating realist explanations of internal conflict: The case of Liberia. Security Studies: Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 186-218

  • The sociology of studies of ethnic conflict

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Civil Wars•2000•Cited by: 2•References: 46

    Is security a pre‐condition for development or is development a precondition for security? Since World War II, scholars studying ethnic conflict have answered this question differently. In reviewing the literature on development and ethnic conflict, this article introduces ideas derived from the sociology of science to explain the lack of consensus. Accordingly, the article suggests that this variation should not be understood as a reflection of …

  • Escalation, Emulation, and the Failure of Hybrid Warfare in Afghanistan

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Studies in Conflict and Terrorism•2016•Cited by: 1

    In this article, I argue that hybridization is a contingent result of the dynamics of some conflicts but not others. In particular, faced with opponents with great power, weaker powers seek a situation of asymmetry to gain victory. Drawing on within-case analysis of the conduct of war during the past thirty years in Afghanistan, I demonstrate that what we now consider to be “hybrid” represents an important continuity and strategic option in Afgha…

  • The International Dimensions of Ethnic Conflict

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Studies in Conflict and Terrorism•2001•Cited by: 1

  • The sociology of studies of ethnic conflict

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Civil Wars•2000•Cited by: 2•References: 46

    Is security a pre‐condition for development or is development a precondition for security? Since World War II, scholars studying ethnic conflict have answered this question differently. In reviewing the literature on development and ethnic conflict, this article introduces ideas derived from the sociology of science to explain the lack of consensus. Accordingly, the article suggests that this variation should not be understood as a reflection of …

  • Towards a typology of internal armed conflict

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Civil Wars•2001•Cited by: 3•References: 41

    The rejuvenated study of internal armed conflict after the Cold War has been plagued with conceptual turmoil. This article argues that this lack of consensus can be explained by the variable nature of the topic itself and that the topic has fallen between disciplinary boundaries. The lack of consensus itself can have damaging effects on our understanding of internal armed conflict. The article therefore outlines a suggested, partly modified, typo…

  • The International Dimensions of Ethnic Conflict

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Studies in Conflict and Terrorism•2001•Cited by: 1

  • The International Dimensions of Ethnic Conflict

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Studies in Conflict and Terrorism•2001•Cited by: 5•References: 7

    (2001). The International Dimensions of Ethnic Conflict. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism: Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 59-69

  • Evaluating realist explanations of internal conflict

    Jan Angstrom, Isabelle Duyvesteyn•ARTICLE•Security Studies•2001•Cited by: 2•References: 29

    (2001). Evaluating realist explanations of internal conflict: The case of Liberia. Security Studies: Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 186-218

  • Survival of the Most Cited? Small Political Science Communities and International Influence

    Open Access•Jan Angstrom, Erik Hedenström et al.•ARTICLE•European Political Science•2003•Cited by: 3

    Can small scholarly communities, such as the Swedish political science community, survive in an academic world often said to be dominated not only by American research but also by American concerns? Does the political science profession in Sweden, a small country with a rather odd (!) language, few political science departments, and few members of the national political science association, have a unique independent Swedish identity - or is curre…

  • Inviting the Leviathan

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2008•Cited by: 3•References: 29

    This article examines the role of intervening forces in state-building efforts after state-collapse and civil wars. Based upon a case study from the 30 years of war in Afghanistan, it develops an explanation for failure of state-building attempts drawing upon bargaining theory, macrosociological state-building theory, and strategic thought. The explanation suggests that international state-building attempts condition and shapes a new strategic en…

  • Introduction

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2008•Cited by: 2•References: 3

    What is the utility of force in modern conflict? This article introduce the overall puzzle of this special issue of Small Wars and Insurgencies. In doing so, it identifies some trends in the development of strategic thought since the end of the cold war. By elaborating on some of the paradoxes of modern military power and the use of force, it also provides a more detailed outline of the articles in this issue

  • Mapping the Competing Historical Analogies of the War on Terrorism

    Open Access•Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•International Relations•2011•Cited by: 6

    This article maps the historical analogies of the war on terrorism used by the Bush administration. It identifies four historical analogies of the war on terrorism present in the US political and academic discourse since the attacks on 11 September 2001. These are the war on terrorism as: (a) the Second World War; (b) the Crusades; (c) the Vietnam War; and (d) the Cold War. These analogies have been a constant presence in the US discourse, althou…

  • Adopting a Recipe for Success

    Jan Angstrom, J J Widen et al.•ARTICLE•Comparative Strategy•2012

    The prevailing explanation of the institutionalization of the principles of war is misleading. Although the introduction of the principles into Western doctrine coincided with total war and the need to train unprecedented numbers of soldiers and junior officers in tactics, the fact that the principles disappeared from doctrines immediately prior to and during the Second World War suggests that they were not institutionalized to meet an increased …

  • Regaining Strategy

    Jan Angstrom, Jan Willem Honig•ARTICLE•Journal of Strategic Studies•2012•Cited by: 3•References: 27

    In Western operations in Afghanistan, small European powers escalate in different ways. While Denmark and the Netherlands have contributed to Western escalation through integration with British and US forces, Norway and Sweden have done so by creating a division of labour allowing US and British combat forces to concentrate their efforts in the south. These variations in strategic behaviour suggest that the strategic choice of small powers is mor…

  • State theory and statebuilding

    Jan Angstrom•CHAPTER•New Agendas in Statebuilding•2013

    On 22 June 2011 President Barack Obama decided to begin the withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan. By September 2012 just over 30,000 of the roughly 100,000 US soldiers in Afghanistan will have rotated home. Over the coming years US forces will gradually continue the withdrawal and, according to the current plan, all Western forces are supposed to have left Afghanistan by the end of 2014 after a more than a decade- long intervention. The decis…

  • The changing norms of civil and military and civil-military relations theory

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2013•Cited by: 3•References: 23

    The dichotomy between civil and military is well-established in international political practice. International law, international order, and war are but some of the institutions that rely upon making a distinction between civil and military. The distinction, arguably, is also central for analyses of conflicts worldwide. Almost daily, we are fed stories of atrocities against civilians in conflict-ridden parts of the world. In academic discourse, …

  • Escalation, Emulation, and the Failure of Hybrid Warfare in Afghanistan

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Studies in Conflict and Terrorism•2016•Cited by: 1

    In this article, I argue that hybridization is a contingent result of the dynamics of some conflicts but not others. In particular, faced with opponents with great power, weaker powers seek a situation of asymmetry to gain victory. Drawing on within-case analysis of the conduct of war during the past thirty years in Afghanistan, I demonstrate that what we now consider to be “hybrid” represents an important continuity and strategic option in Afgha…

  • Religion or reason? exploring alternative ways to measure the quality of doctrine

    Jan Angstrom, J J Widen et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Strategic Studies•2016•Cited by: 4•References: 15

    In this article, we address the often ignored issue of quality standards for doctrine. In doing so, we contribute to the existing literature on military doctrine, since much of previous research has focused on outlining the effects of doctrine or the causes of particular doctrinal content, rather than how we should measure its quality. The predominant way of understanding quality of doctrine is based on the rationalist understanding of doctrine a…

  • Why small states join big wars

    Open Access•Erik Noreen, Roxanna Sjöstedt et al.•ARTICLE•International Relations•2017

    The security behavior of small states has traditionally been explained by different takes of realism, liberalism, or constructivism - focusing on the behavior that aims toward safeguarding sovereignty or engaging in peace policies. The issue of why states with limited military capacities and little or no military alignments or engagements decide to participate in an international mission has received limited attention by previous research. In con…

  • The US perspective on future war

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•Defence Studies•2018•Cited by: 3•References: 16

    This article addresses why the US in its military operations tends to focus on only one dimension in war – the military narrowly understood. More precisely, in the US case, its armed forces tend to be preoccupied with platforms and understand military capabilities as those that deliver death and destruction. I explain this one-sided understanding of the military dimension in war with how the US armed forces think about future war. How the US unde…

  • Weak party escalation

    Jan Angstrom, Magnus Petersson•ARTICLE•Journal of Strategic Studies•2019•References: 28

    In this article, we develop the strategic rationale behind weak party escalation against stronger adversaries. There are, we suggest, four main strategies: to provoke a desired over-reaction from the stronger adversary; to compartmentalize conflict within a domain in which the weak party has advantages; to carve a niche with a stronger ally, and to forge a reputation of not yielding lightly. Spelling out these different logics contributes to the …

  • Contribution Warfare

    Jan Angstrom•ARTICLE•The US Army War College Quarterly…•2020

  • Unpacking the varying strategic logics of total defence

    Open Access•Jan Angstrom, Kristin Ljungkvist•ARTICLE•Journal of Strategic Studies•2024•References: 25

    What is the strategic logic of so-called 'total defence'? At first glance, total defence may appear as one coherent strategic concept. Indeed, it was predominantly small, non-aligned states that pursued total defence during the Cold War. In this article, however, we demonstrate that depending on how 'total war' is understood, there are subsequently different strategic logics ingrained in total defence. We show this by developing a typology of dif…

  • Explaining disciplinary heterogeneity in Nordic War/Military Studies

    Open Access•Jan Angstrom, David Larsson Gebre-Medhin•ARTICLE•Cooperation and Conflict•2025•References: 11

    How should the diversity of Nordic War/Military Studies be explained? Despite having experienced similar external shocks to international security since the end of the Cold War, and notwithstanding their relative cultural homogeneity, university environments throughout the Nordic states have developed diverging conceptualizations of War/Military Studies. We demonstrate that this variation can be explained in terms of supply and demand factors in …

Political science (19 works) · Law (17 works) · Sociology (15 works) · Law (14 works) · Political economy (11 works) · Epistemology (10 works) · Politics (10 works) · Philosophy (8 works) · Political Conflict and Governance (8 works) · Military History and Strategy (6 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae