Philippe Beaulieu-Brossard
Biographic Data
| ID | 1667885 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Philippe Beaulieu-Brossard |
| GIVEN NAMES | Philippe |
| FAMILY NAME | Beaulieu-Brossard |
| SIGNATURE | BEAULIEU-BROSSARD P |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of St Andrews |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 10 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Thank You to Reviewers
(De)securitisation dilemmas
This article theorises the simultaneous enaction of securitising and desecuritising moves. It argues that the frequent simultaneity of these two processes, which are normally considered mutually exclusive within Securitisation Theory (ST), has previously gone unnoticed given a set of methodological, temporal, and ontological biases that have developed within ST. Demonstrating how these biases can be overcome – and even reconciled with the seminal…
Bypassing the reflexivity trap
The struggle over the identity of IR
Since the inception of International Relations (IR) within university departments, its disciplinary status has been the subject of constant debate. Yet, the current literature on 'the state of the discipline' silences this debate either through IR's assumed disciplinarity or conflation of debates about theory with the existence of IR. This Forum moves beyond this literature by explicitly engaging whether IR is a discipline or not and by enquiring…
(De)securitisation dilemmas
This article theorises the simultaneous enaction of securitising and desecuritising moves. It argues that the frequent simultaneity of these two processes, which are normally considered mutually exclusive within Securitisation Theory (ST), has previously gone unnoticed given a set of methodological, temporal, and ontological biases that have developed within ST. Demonstrating how these biases can be overcome – and even reconciled with the seminal…
The struggle over the identity of IR
Since the inception of International Relations (IR) within university departments, its disciplinary status has been the subject of constant debate. Yet, the current literature on 'the state of the discipline' silences this debate either through IR's assumed disciplinarity or conflation of debates about theory with the existence of IR. This Forum moves beyond this literature by explicitly engaging whether IR is a discipline or not and by enquiring…
Bypassing the reflexivity trap
Bypassing the reflexivity trap
The struggle over the identity of IR
Since the inception of International Relations (IR) within university departments, its disciplinary status has been the subject of constant debate. Yet, the current literature on 'the state of the discipline' silences this debate either through IR's assumed disciplinarity or conflation of debates about theory with the existence of IR. This Forum moves beyond this literature by explicitly engaging whether IR is a discipline or not and by enquiring…
(De)securitisation dilemmas
This article theorises the simultaneous enaction of securitising and desecuritising moves. It argues that the frequent simultaneity of these two processes, which are normally considered mutually exclusive within Securitisation Theory (ST), has previously gone unnoticed given a set of methodological, temporal, and ontological biases that have developed within ST. Demonstrating how these biases can be overcome – and even reconciled with the seminal…
Thank You to Reviewers
Global Security and Public Health (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Discipline (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · International relations (2 works) · Social science (2 works)