Thomas C Berg
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 1696178 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Thomas C Berg |
| PRENOMES | Thomas C |
| SOBRENOME | Berg |
| ASSINATURA | BERG T C |
| AFILIAÇÕES | University of St. Thomas - Minnesota |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 5 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 0 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 5 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1995 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2025 |
| ÍNDICE H | 0 |
Defining Neutrality, Combating Polarization
Douglas Laycock’s career in Religion Clause scholarship and advocacy spans two periods marked by two distinct concerns at the heart of the debates. This article connects them. In the first period, from the 1980s into the 2000s, the central issue was what general value or principle should drive Religion Clause decision-making. Laycock’s approach, substantive neutrality toward religion, focused on minimizing government effects on religious choices …
Espinoza , Government Funding, and Religious Choice
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue , holding that religious schools cannot be excluded from a state program of financial aid to private schools, is another incremental step in the Court's long-running project to reform the constitutional law of financial aid to religious institutions. There was nothing surprising about the decision, and it changed little; it was the inevitable next link in a long chain …
Religious Liberty in a Pluralistic Society
Religious Liberty in America at the End of the Century
The last decade of the 20th century has brought ferment and change in the American constitutional law concerning religious liberty. Change has come on several fronts. Throughout the 1990s, the U.S. Supreme Court and the Congress have battled over the scope of the right to free exercise of religion. First the Court narrowed the right dramatically, then Congress responded with a statute “restoring” the previous broader standard, only to see the Cou…
"Proclaiming Together"? Convergence and Divergence in Mainline and Evangelical Evangelism, 1945-1967
By now, it is a commonplace of the American religious scene that the majority of the nation's white Protestant Christians are split into "two parties." The ideological dividing line runs between "mainline" denominations-Methodists, Presbyterians, Episcopalians-and a bevy of conservative denominations and groups, but it also cuts through the mainline itself, which contains a substantial contingent of conservatives.Among the two parties' numerous d…
Sem obras proeminentes nesta página.
"Proclaiming Together"? Convergence and Divergence in Mainline and Evangelical Evangelism, 1945-1967
By now, it is a commonplace of the American religious scene that the majority of the nation's white Protestant Christians are split into "two parties." The ideological dividing line runs between "mainline" denominations-Methodists, Presbyterians, Episcopalians-and a bevy of conservative denominations and groups, but it also cuts through the mainline itself, which contains a substantial contingent of conservatives.Among the two parties' numerous d…
Religious Liberty in a Pluralistic Society
Religious Liberty in America at the End of the Century
The last decade of the 20th century has brought ferment and change in the American constitutional law concerning religious liberty. Change has come on several fronts. Throughout the 1990s, the U.S. Supreme Court and the Congress have battled over the scope of the right to free exercise of religion. First the Court narrowed the right dramatically, then Congress responded with a statute “restoring” the previous broader standard, only to see the Cou…
Espinoza , Government Funding, and Religious Choice
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue , holding that religious schools cannot be excluded from a state program of financial aid to private schools, is another incremental step in the Court's long-running project to reform the constitutional law of financial aid to religious institutions. There was nothing surprising about the decision, and it changed little; it was the inevitable next link in a long chain …
Defining Neutrality, Combating Polarization
Douglas Laycock’s career in Religion Clause scholarship and advocacy spans two periods marked by two distinct concerns at the heart of the debates. This article connects them. In the first period, from the 1980s into the 2000s, the central issue was what general value or principle should drive Religion Clause decision-making. Laycock’s approach, substantive neutrality toward religion, focused on minimizing government effects on religious choices …
Law (5 obras) · Political science (5 obras) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 obras) · Religion and Society Interactions (3 obras) · Sociology (3 obras) · Economics (2 obras) · Faith (2 obras) · Free Exercise Clause (2 obras) · Philosophy (2 obras) · Politics (2 obras)