Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Marsha Michie

Biographic Data

ID1738772
NAMEMarsha Michie
GIVEN NAMESMarsha
FAMILY NAMEMichie
SIGNATUREMICHIE M
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
ORCID0000-0001-6631-828X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS13
TOTAL CITATIONS29
AUTHOR COUNT12
EDITOR COUNT1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2010
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX4
  • Trust As the Foundation for Informed Decision‐Making in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing

    Open Access•Miller Finkelstein, Christina Collart et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2026

  • Rethinking the Burden of Traditional Informed Consent Prior to Prenatal Genetic Screening

    Open Access•Megan A Allyse, Megan Allyse et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•2025

    The ethics literature and professional guidelines call for extensive discussions prior to prescreening consent to prenatal cell‐free DNA screening to, theoretically, allow patients to make decisions that match their values and goals of care. Most patients, however, actively avoid in‐depth moral deliberation when consenting to prenatal screening and then receive a screen‐negative result, suggesting that an information‐heavy process is irrelevant f…

  • Born Well

    Open Access•Megan A Allyse, Marsha Michie•BOOK•Born Well: Prenatal Genetics and…•2022

  • Born Well

    Megan Allyse, Marsha Michie•BOOK•Born Well•2021

  • Prioritizing Women's Health in Germline Editing Research

    Open Access•Ruth M Farrell, Marsha Michie et al.•ARTICLE•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2019

    Although women are inextricably involved in the study of germline editing, their interests have not been significantly represented in debates about the evolution of genome editing technology. Discussions have taken place about effects of germline editing on women as parents and members of families, but key discussions about women's health and well-being as patients and subjects are lacking. This neglect is due in part to restrictions on uterine t…

  • Toward an Ethically Sensitive Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in the Global Context

    Open Access•Jessica Mozersky, Vardit Ravitsky et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•2017

    Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell‐free DNA, which analyzes placental DNA circulating in maternal blood to provide information about fetal chromosomal disorders early in pregnancy and without risk to the fetus, has been hailed as a potential “paradigm shift” in prenatal genetic screening. Commercial provision of cell‐free DNA screening has contributed to a rapid expansion of the tests included in the screening panels. The tests can include…

  • Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening

    Open Access•Marsha Michie, Stephanie A Kraft et al.•ARTICLE•Ethics Medicine and Public Health•2016

  • “I think we’ve got too many tests!”

    Open Access•Betsy L Gammon, Stephanie A Kraft et al.•ARTICLE•Ethics Medicine and Public Health•2016

  • Flexible positions, managed hopes

    Open Access•Rachel Haase, Marsha Michie et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2015•Cited by: 8•References: 32

  • Research Participants' Perspectives on Genotype-Driven Research Recruitment

    Open Access•Laura M Beskow, Emily Namey et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 4

    Genotype-driven recruitment is a potentially powerful approach for studying human genetic variation but presents ethical challenges. We conducted in-depth interviews with research participants in six studies where such recruitment occurred. Nearly all responded favorably to the acceptability of recontact for research recruitment, and genotype-driven recruitment was viewed as a positive sign of scientific advancement. Reactions to questions about …

  • If I Could in a Small Way Help”

    Open Access•Marsha Michie, Gail E Henderson et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2011•Cited by: 6•References: 13

    Human genome research depends upon participants who donate genetic samples, but few studies have explored in depth the motivations of genetic research donors. This mixed methods study examines telephone interviews with 752 sample donors in a U.S. genetic epidemiology study investigating colorectal cancer. Quantitative and qualitative results indicate that most participants wanted to help society, and that many also wanted information about their …

  • The Meaning of Genetic Research Results

    Open Access•R Jean Cadigan, Marsha Michie et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2011•Cited by: 5•References: 1

    In the debate about whether to return individual genetic results to research participants, consideration of the nature of results has taken precedence over contextual factors associated with different study designs and populations. We conducted in-depth interviews with 24 individuals who participated in a genotype-driven study of cystic fibrosis: 9 of the individuals had cystic fibrosis, 15 had participated as healthy volunteers, and all had gene…

  • Narrating Disability, Narrating Religious Practice

    Marsha Michie, Debra Skinner•ARTICLE•Intellectual and Developmental…•2010•Cited by: 8•References: 9

    This article examines the place of religion in the narratives of mothers of children with fragile X syndrome. In semistructured interviews, a majority of women combined narratives of religious practice with illness narratives, interpreting their children's disabilities within a religious framework. Informed by Arthur Frank's (1995) concept of “wounded storytellers,” the authors articulate a reconciliation narrative that mothers commonly used to d…

  • Flexible positions, managed hopes

    Open Access•Rachel Haase, Marsha Michie et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2015•Cited by: 8•References: 32

  • Narrating Disability, Narrating Religious Practice

    Marsha Michie, Debra Skinner•ARTICLE•Intellectual and Developmental…•2010•Cited by: 8•References: 9

    This article examines the place of religion in the narratives of mothers of children with fragile X syndrome. In semistructured interviews, a majority of women combined narratives of religious practice with illness narratives, interpreting their children's disabilities within a religious framework. Informed by Arthur Frank's (1995) concept of “wounded storytellers,” the authors articulate a reconciliation narrative that mothers commonly used to d…

  • If I Could in a Small Way Help”

    Open Access•Marsha Michie, Gail E Henderson et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2011•Cited by: 6•References: 13

    Human genome research depends upon participants who donate genetic samples, but few studies have explored in depth the motivations of genetic research donors. This mixed methods study examines telephone interviews with 752 sample donors in a U.S. genetic epidemiology study investigating colorectal cancer. Quantitative and qualitative results indicate that most participants wanted to help society, and that many also wanted information about their …

  • The Meaning of Genetic Research Results

    Open Access•R Jean Cadigan, Marsha Michie et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2011•Cited by: 5•References: 1

    In the debate about whether to return individual genetic results to research participants, consideration of the nature of results has taken precedence over contextual factors associated with different study designs and populations. We conducted in-depth interviews with 24 individuals who participated in a genotype-driven study of cystic fibrosis: 9 of the individuals had cystic fibrosis, 15 had participated as healthy volunteers, and all had gene…

  • Research Participants' Perspectives on Genotype-Driven Research Recruitment

    Open Access•Laura M Beskow, Emily Namey et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 4

    Genotype-driven recruitment is a potentially powerful approach for studying human genetic variation but presents ethical challenges. We conducted in-depth interviews with research participants in six studies where such recruitment occurred. Nearly all responded favorably to the acceptability of recontact for research recruitment, and genotype-driven recruitment was viewed as a positive sign of scientific advancement. Reactions to questions about …

  • Narrating Disability, Narrating Religious Practice

    Marsha Michie, Debra Skinner•ARTICLE•Intellectual and Developmental…•2010•Cited by: 8•References: 9

    This article examines the place of religion in the narratives of mothers of children with fragile X syndrome. In semistructured interviews, a majority of women combined narratives of religious practice with illness narratives, interpreting their children's disabilities within a religious framework. Informed by Arthur Frank's (1995) concept of “wounded storytellers,” the authors articulate a reconciliation narrative that mothers commonly used to d…

  • Research Participants' Perspectives on Genotype-Driven Research Recruitment

    Open Access•Laura M Beskow, Emily Namey et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 4

    Genotype-driven recruitment is a potentially powerful approach for studying human genetic variation but presents ethical challenges. We conducted in-depth interviews with research participants in six studies where such recruitment occurred. Nearly all responded favorably to the acceptability of recontact for research recruitment, and genotype-driven recruitment was viewed as a positive sign of scientific advancement. Reactions to questions about …

  • If I Could in a Small Way Help”

    Open Access•Marsha Michie, Gail E Henderson et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2011•Cited by: 6•References: 13

    Human genome research depends upon participants who donate genetic samples, but few studies have explored in depth the motivations of genetic research donors. This mixed methods study examines telephone interviews with 752 sample donors in a U.S. genetic epidemiology study investigating colorectal cancer. Quantitative and qualitative results indicate that most participants wanted to help society, and that many also wanted information about their …

  • The Meaning of Genetic Research Results

    Open Access•R Jean Cadigan, Marsha Michie et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2011•Cited by: 5•References: 1

    In the debate about whether to return individual genetic results to research participants, consideration of the nature of results has taken precedence over contextual factors associated with different study designs and populations. We conducted in-depth interviews with 24 individuals who participated in a genotype-driven study of cystic fibrosis: 9 of the individuals had cystic fibrosis, 15 had participated as healthy volunteers, and all had gene…

  • Flexible positions, managed hopes

    Open Access•Rachel Haase, Marsha Michie et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2015•Cited by: 8•References: 32

  • Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening

    Open Access•Marsha Michie, Stephanie A Kraft et al.•ARTICLE•Ethics Medicine and Public Health•2016

  • “I think we’ve got too many tests!”

    Open Access•Betsy L Gammon, Stephanie A Kraft et al.•ARTICLE•Ethics Medicine and Public Health•2016

  • Toward an Ethically Sensitive Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in the Global Context

    Open Access•Jessica Mozersky, Vardit Ravitsky et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•2017

    Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell‐free DNA, which analyzes placental DNA circulating in maternal blood to provide information about fetal chromosomal disorders early in pregnancy and without risk to the fetus, has been hailed as a potential “paradigm shift” in prenatal genetic screening. Commercial provision of cell‐free DNA screening has contributed to a rapid expansion of the tests included in the screening panels. The tests can include…

  • Prioritizing Women's Health in Germline Editing Research

    Open Access•Ruth M Farrell, Marsha Michie et al.•ARTICLE•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2019

    Although women are inextricably involved in the study of germline editing, their interests have not been significantly represented in debates about the evolution of genome editing technology. Discussions have taken place about effects of germline editing on women as parents and members of families, but key discussions about women's health and well-being as patients and subjects are lacking. This neglect is due in part to restrictions on uterine t…

  • Born Well

    Megan Allyse, Marsha Michie•BOOK•Born Well•2021

  • Born Well

    Open Access•Megan A Allyse, Marsha Michie•BOOK•Born Well: Prenatal Genetics and…•2022

  • Rethinking the Burden of Traditional Informed Consent Prior to Prenatal Genetic Screening

    Open Access•Megan A Allyse, Megan Allyse et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•2025

    The ethics literature and professional guidelines call for extensive discussions prior to prescreening consent to prenatal cell‐free DNA screening to, theoretically, allow patients to make decisions that match their values and goals of care. Most patients, however, actively avoid in‐depth moral deliberation when consenting to prenatal screening and then receive a screen‐negative result, suggesting that an information‐heavy process is irrelevant f…

  • Trust As the Foundation for Informed Decision‐Making in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing

    Open Access•Miller Finkelstein, Christina Collart et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2026

Psychology (9 works) · Biology (6 works) · BRCA gene mutations in cancer (6 works) · Genetics (5 works) · Medicine (5 works) · Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 works) · Family medicine (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae