Vivian Reckers-Droog
Biographic Data
| ID | 1739691 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Vivian Reckers-Droog |
| GIVEN NAMES | Vivian |
| FAMILY NAME | Reckers-Droog |
| SIGNATURE | RECKERS-DROOG V |
| AFFILIATIONS | Erasmus University Rotterdam |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8722-3431 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 9 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Are public preferences over health distributions guided by principles of distribution? A social choice experiment
OBJECTIVES: Policymakers must decide how to distribute limited healthcare resources and may wish to draw upon public preferences to identify whom to prioritise. However, little is known about the reasons underlying these preferences. The aim of this study is to examine public preferences over health distributions and the extent to which the reasons underlying them reflect one of the following principles of distribution: equality, need, responsibi…
Understanding public opposition to negative reimbursement decisions in healthcare
The pressure on publicly financed healthcare systems may necessitate decisions to not (or no longer) reimburse health technologies. Such decisions remain politically sensitive and often evoke public opposition, pressuring decision-makers to revoke or revise them. However, the elements that constitute public opposition remain unclear. This study addresses this gap by systematically reviewing the scientific literature. We searched Embase, Google Sc…
Viewpoints of local decision-makers on what matters in the allocation of scarce social care resources in the Netherlands
Social care supports individuals with functional impairments to live at home independently and participate in society for as long as possible. The demand for social care continues to rise, driven by increased longevity and demographic ageing. In the Netherlands, local decision-makers enjoy discretion to allocate the limited social care budget in view of local needs. The aim of this study is to examine their viewpoints on what matters in the alloc…
Examining the underpinnings of decisions to allocate public resources to social care
Methodological choices in applications of Q methodology
Q methodology provides a foundation for the systematic study of subjectivity, people's viewpoints about a topic of interest. Over the past two decades, Q methodology has rapidly gained popularity among researchers in various disciplines. However, the variation in how the method is applied has also increased. The aim of this study was to provide insight into the methodological choices made in recent applications of Q methodology. We conducted a sy…
Viewpoints among experts and the public in the Netherlands on including a lifestyle criterion in the healthcare priority setting
CONTEXT: It remains unclear whether there would be societal support for a lifestyle criterion for the healthcare priority setting. This study examines the viewpoints of experts in healthcare and the public regarding support for a lifestyle-related decision criterion, relative to support for the currently applied criteria, in the healthcare priority setting in the Netherlands. METHODS: We conducted a Q methodology study in samples of experts in he…
Willingness to pay for quality and length of life gains in end of life patients of different ages
Societal views in the Netherlands on active disinvestment of publicly funded healthcare interventions
How does participating in a deliberative citizens panel on healthcare priority setting influence the views of participants
A deliberative citizens panel was held to obtain insight into criteria considered relevant for healthcare priority setting in the Netherlands. Our aim was to examine whether and how panel participation influenced participants’ views on this topic. Participants (n = 24) deliberated on eight reimbursement cases in September and October, 2017. Using Q methodology, we identified three distinct viewpoints before (T0) and after (T1) panel participation…
How does participating in a deliberative citizens panel on healthcare priority setting influence the views of participants
A deliberative citizens panel was held to obtain insight into criteria considered relevant for healthcare priority setting in the Netherlands. Our aim was to examine whether and how panel participation influenced participants’ views on this topic. Participants (n = 24) deliberated on eight reimbursement cases in September and October, 2017. Using Q methodology, we identified three distinct viewpoints before (T0) and after (T1) panel participation…
Willingness to pay for quality and length of life gains in end of life patients of different ages
Societal views in the Netherlands on active disinvestment of publicly funded healthcare interventions
Viewpoints among experts and the public in the Netherlands on including a lifestyle criterion in the healthcare priority setting
CONTEXT: It remains unclear whether there would be societal support for a lifestyle criterion for the healthcare priority setting. This study examines the viewpoints of experts in healthcare and the public regarding support for a lifestyle-related decision criterion, relative to support for the currently applied criteria, in the healthcare priority setting in the Netherlands. METHODS: We conducted a Q methodology study in samples of experts in he…
Methodological choices in applications of Q methodology
Q methodology provides a foundation for the systematic study of subjectivity, people's viewpoints about a topic of interest. Over the past two decades, Q methodology has rapidly gained popularity among researchers in various disciplines. However, the variation in how the method is applied has also increased. The aim of this study was to provide insight into the methodological choices made in recent applications of Q methodology. We conducted a sy…
Examining the underpinnings of decisions to allocate public resources to social care
Viewpoints of local decision-makers on what matters in the allocation of scarce social care resources in the Netherlands
Social care supports individuals with functional impairments to live at home independently and participate in society for as long as possible. The demand for social care continues to rise, driven by increased longevity and demographic ageing. In the Netherlands, local decision-makers enjoy discretion to allocate the limited social care budget in view of local needs. The aim of this study is to examine their viewpoints on what matters in the alloc…
Are public preferences over health distributions guided by principles of distribution? A social choice experiment
OBJECTIVES: Policymakers must decide how to distribute limited healthcare resources and may wish to draw upon public preferences to identify whom to prioritise. However, little is known about the reasons underlying these preferences. The aim of this study is to examine public preferences over health distributions and the extent to which the reasons underlying them reflect one of the following principles of distribution: equality, need, responsibi…
Understanding public opposition to negative reimbursement decisions in healthcare
The pressure on publicly financed healthcare systems may necessitate decisions to not (or no longer) reimburse health technologies. Such decisions remain politically sensitive and often evoke public opposition, pressuring decision-makers to revoke or revise them. However, the elements that constitute public opposition remain unclear. This study addresses this gap by systematically reviewing the scientific literature. We searched Embase, Google Sc…
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 works) · Public health (6 works) · Health care (5 works) · Medicine (5 works) · Nursing (5 works) · Economics (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Viewpoints (4 works) · Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 works) · Economic growth (3 works)