Katalin Sulyok
Biographic Data
| ID | 1746403 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Katalin Sulyok |
| GIVEN NAMES | Katalin |
| FAMILY NAME | Sulyok |
| SIGNATURE | SULYOK K |
| AFFILIATIONS | Eötvös Loránd University |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-1807-8183 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Transforming the Rule of Law in Environmental and Climate Litigation: Prohibiting the Arbitrary Treatment of Future Generations
This article maps the shared legal anatomy of climate and environmental lawsuits, in which plaintiffs claim protection for future generations before domestic or international courts. By closely analyzing the litigation strategies of plaintiffs and the inquiry of courts, the article argues that these proceedings revolve around structurally similar legal standards across domestic and international jurisdictions, which correspond to five normative r…
Future Generations Litigation and Transformative Changes in Environmental Governance
Rationale and Aim of the
Science, epistemology and legitimacy in environmental disputes – The epistemically legitimate judicial argumentative space
This article maps the elements of the epistemically legitimate argumentative space of judges in scientific disputes, where scientific facts and arguments intrude into the legally relevant aspects of the legal controversy. The article distinguishes four main forms of legitimate hybrid reasoning styles. It identifies the epistemic risks threatening the legitimacy of decisions in light of the corresponding limits of the epistemically legitimate argu…
Science, epistemology and legitimacy in environmental disputes – The epistemically legitimate judicial argumentative space
This article maps the elements of the epistemically legitimate argumentative space of judges in scientific disputes, where scientific facts and arguments intrude into the legally relevant aspects of the legal controversy. The article distinguishes four main forms of legitimate hybrid reasoning styles. It identifies the epistemic risks threatening the legitimacy of decisions in light of the corresponding limits of the epistemically legitimate argu…
Science, epistemology and legitimacy in environmental disputes – The epistemically legitimate judicial argumentative space
This article maps the elements of the epistemically legitimate argumentative space of judges in scientific disputes, where scientific facts and arguments intrude into the legally relevant aspects of the legal controversy. The article distinguishes four main forms of legitimate hybrid reasoning styles. It identifies the epistemic risks threatening the legitimacy of decisions in light of the corresponding limits of the epistemically legitimate argu…
Transforming the Rule of Law in Environmental and Climate Litigation: Prohibiting the Arbitrary Treatment of Future Generations
This article maps the shared legal anatomy of climate and environmental lawsuits, in which plaintiffs claim protection for future generations before domestic or international courts. By closely analyzing the litigation strategies of plaintiffs and the inquiry of courts, the article argues that these proceedings revolve around structurally similar legal standards across domestic and international jurisdictions, which correspond to five normative r…
Future Generations Litigation and Transformative Changes in Environmental Governance
Rationale and Aim of the
Environmental law and policy (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Law (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Argumentative (1 works) · Business (1 works) · Climate Change and Geoengineering (1 works) · Computer Science (1 works) · Corporate governance (1 works)