Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Stefano Palminteri

Biographic Data

ID1752964
NAMEStefano Palminteri
GIVEN NAMESStefano
FAMILY NAMEPalminteri
SIGNATUREPALMINTERI S
AFFILIATIONSLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives
ORCID0000-0001-5768-6646
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS14
TOTAL CITATIONS9
AUTHOR COUNT14
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX1
  • Relative Value Encoding in Large Language Models: A Multi-Task, Multi-Model Investigation

    Open Access•William M Hayes, Nicolas Yax et al.•ARTICLE•Open MIND•2025

    Abtract In-context learning enables large language models (LLMs) to perform a variety of tasks, including solving reinforcement learning (RL) problems. Given their potential use as (autonomous) decision-making agents, it is important to understand how these models behave in RL tasks and the extent to which they are susceptible to biases. Motivated by the fact that, in humans, it has been widely documented that the value of a choice outcome depend…

  • Human reinforcement learning processes and biases: Computational Characterization and Possible Applications to Behavioral Public Policy

    Open Access•Stefano Palminteri•ARTICLE•Mind & Society•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 6

    The reinforcement learning framework provides a computational and behavioral foundation for understanding how agents learn to maximize rewards and minimize punishments through interaction with their environment. This framework has been widely applied across disciplines, including artificial intelligence, animal psychology, and economics. Over the last decade, a growing body of research has shown that human reinforcement learning often deviates fr…

  • Comparing experience- and description-based economic preferences across 11 countries

    Open Access•Hernán Anlló, Sophie Bavard et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2024•References: 77

  • Author Correction: Comparing experience- and description-based economic preferences across 11 countries

    Open Access•Hernán Anlló, Sophie Bavard et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2024

  • Feedback-induced dispositional changes in risk preferences

    Stefano Palminteri, Maël Lebreton et al.•PREPRINT•2023

    Contrary to the normative decision-making standpoint, empirical studies have repeatedly reported that risk preferences are affected by the disclosure of choice outcomes (feedback). Although no consensus has yet emerged regarding the properties and mechanisms of this effect, a widespread and intuitive hypothesis is that repeated feedback affects risk preferences by means of learning, which alters the representation of subjective probabilities. Her…

  • Linking confidence biases to reinforcement-learning processes

    Nahuel Salem-Garcia, Stefano Palminteri et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Review•2023

    We systematically misjudge our own performance in simple economic tasks. First, we generally overestimate our ability to make correct choices-a bias called overconfidence. Second, we are more confident in our choices when we seek gains than when we try to avoid losses-a bias we refer to as the valence-induced confidence bias. Strikingly, these two biases are also present in reinforcement-learning (RL) contexts, despite the fact that outcomes are …

  • Experiential values are underweighted in decisions involving symbolic options

    Open Access•Basile Garcia, Maël Lebreton et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 70

  • The impassable gap between experiential and symbolic values

    Basile Garcia, Maël Lebreton et al.•PREPRINT•2022

    To choose between options of different natures, standard decision models presume that a single representational system ultimately indexes their subjective values on a common scale, regardless of how they are constructed. To challenge this assumption, we systematically investigated hybrid decisions between experiential options, whose value is built from past outcomes experience, and symbolic options which describe probabilistic outcomes. We show t…

  • Dissociation between task structure learning and performance in human model-based reinforcement learning

    Sabrine Hamroun, Maël Lebreton et al.•PREPRINT•2022

    The multi-step learning paradigm has become the dominant paradigm to investigate the trade-off between model-free reinforcement learning – which only leverages state-action-reward associations – and model-based reinforcement learning – which additionally builds on an explicit representation of state-transitions. Experimentally, while reward values usually have to be learned by trial-and-errors, state-transitions are customarily provided by instru…

  • SalemGarcia_2021

    Nahuel Salem-Garcia, Stefano Palminteri et al.•PREPRINT•2021

    We systematically misjudge our own performance in simple economic tasks. First, we generally overestimate our ability to make correct choices – a bias called overconfidence. Second, we are more confident in our choices when we seek gains than when we try to avoid losses – a bias we refer to as the valence-induced confidence bias. Strikingly, these two biases are also present in reinforcement-learning contexts, despite the fact that outcomes are p…

  • Context-dependent outcome encoding in human reinforcement learning

    Stefano Palminteri, Maël Lebreton•PREPRINT•2021

    A wealth of evidence in perceptual and economic decision-making research suggests that the subjective value of one option is determined by other available options (i.e. the context). A series of studies provides evidence that the same coding principles apply to situations where decisions are shaped by past outcomes, i.e. in reinforcement-learning situations. In bandit tasks, human behavior is explained by models assuming that individuals do not l…

  • Information about action outcomes differentially affects learning from self-determined versus imposed choices

    Open Access•Valérian Chambon, Héloïse Théro et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2020•References: 40

  • Assessing inter-individual differences with task-related functional neuroimaging

    Open Access•Maël Lebreton, Sophie Bavard et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2019•References: 98

  • Behavioural and neural characterization of optimistic reinforcement learning

    Open Access•Germain Lefebvre, Maël Lebreton et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2017•Cited by: 7•References: 48

  • Behavioural and neural characterization of optimistic reinforcement learning

    Open Access•Germain Lefebvre, Maël Lebreton et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2017•Cited by: 7•References: 48

  • Human reinforcement learning processes and biases: Computational Characterization and Possible Applications to Behavioral Public Policy

    Open Access•Stefano Palminteri•ARTICLE•Mind & Society•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 6

    The reinforcement learning framework provides a computational and behavioral foundation for understanding how agents learn to maximize rewards and minimize punishments through interaction with their environment. This framework has been widely applied across disciplines, including artificial intelligence, animal psychology, and economics. Over the last decade, a growing body of research has shown that human reinforcement learning often deviates fr…

  • Experiential values are underweighted in decisions involving symbolic options

    Open Access•Basile Garcia, Maël Lebreton et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 70

  • Behavioural and neural characterization of optimistic reinforcement learning

    Open Access•Germain Lefebvre, Maël Lebreton et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2017•Cited by: 7•References: 48

  • Assessing inter-individual differences with task-related functional neuroimaging

    Open Access•Maël Lebreton, Sophie Bavard et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2019•References: 98

  • Information about action outcomes differentially affects learning from self-determined versus imposed choices

    Open Access•Valérian Chambon, Héloïse Théro et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2020•References: 40

  • SalemGarcia_2021

    Nahuel Salem-Garcia, Stefano Palminteri et al.•PREPRINT•2021

    We systematically misjudge our own performance in simple economic tasks. First, we generally overestimate our ability to make correct choices – a bias called overconfidence. Second, we are more confident in our choices when we seek gains than when we try to avoid losses – a bias we refer to as the valence-induced confidence bias. Strikingly, these two biases are also present in reinforcement-learning contexts, despite the fact that outcomes are p…

  • Context-dependent outcome encoding in human reinforcement learning

    Stefano Palminteri, Maël Lebreton•PREPRINT•2021

    A wealth of evidence in perceptual and economic decision-making research suggests that the subjective value of one option is determined by other available options (i.e. the context). A series of studies provides evidence that the same coding principles apply to situations where decisions are shaped by past outcomes, i.e. in reinforcement-learning situations. In bandit tasks, human behavior is explained by models assuming that individuals do not l…

  • The impassable gap between experiential and symbolic values

    Basile Garcia, Maël Lebreton et al.•PREPRINT•2022

    To choose between options of different natures, standard decision models presume that a single representational system ultimately indexes their subjective values on a common scale, regardless of how they are constructed. To challenge this assumption, we systematically investigated hybrid decisions between experiential options, whose value is built from past outcomes experience, and symbolic options which describe probabilistic outcomes. We show t…

  • Dissociation between task structure learning and performance in human model-based reinforcement learning

    Sabrine Hamroun, Maël Lebreton et al.•PREPRINT•2022

    The multi-step learning paradigm has become the dominant paradigm to investigate the trade-off between model-free reinforcement learning – which only leverages state-action-reward associations – and model-based reinforcement learning – which additionally builds on an explicit representation of state-transitions. Experimentally, while reward values usually have to be learned by trial-and-errors, state-transitions are customarily provided by instru…

  • Feedback-induced dispositional changes in risk preferences

    Stefano Palminteri, Maël Lebreton et al.•PREPRINT•2023

    Contrary to the normative decision-making standpoint, empirical studies have repeatedly reported that risk preferences are affected by the disclosure of choice outcomes (feedback). Although no consensus has yet emerged regarding the properties and mechanisms of this effect, a widespread and intuitive hypothesis is that repeated feedback affects risk preferences by means of learning, which alters the representation of subjective probabilities. Her…

  • Linking confidence biases to reinforcement-learning processes

    Nahuel Salem-Garcia, Stefano Palminteri et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Review•2023

    We systematically misjudge our own performance in simple economic tasks. First, we generally overestimate our ability to make correct choices-a bias called overconfidence. Second, we are more confident in our choices when we seek gains than when we try to avoid losses-a bias we refer to as the valence-induced confidence bias. Strikingly, these two biases are also present in reinforcement-learning (RL) contexts, despite the fact that outcomes are …

  • Experiential values are underweighted in decisions involving symbolic options

    Open Access•Basile Garcia, Maël Lebreton et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 70

  • Comparing experience- and description-based economic preferences across 11 countries

    Open Access•Hernán Anlló, Sophie Bavard et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2024•References: 77

  • Author Correction: Comparing experience- and description-based economic preferences across 11 countries

    Open Access•Hernán Anlló, Sophie Bavard et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2024

  • Relative Value Encoding in Large Language Models: A Multi-Task, Multi-Model Investigation

    Open Access•William M Hayes, Nicolas Yax et al.•ARTICLE•Open MIND•2025

    Abtract In-context learning enables large language models (LLMs) to perform a variety of tasks, including solving reinforcement learning (RL) problems. Given their potential use as (autonomous) decision-making agents, it is important to understand how these models behave in RL tasks and the extent to which they are susceptible to biases. Motivated by the fact that, in humans, it has been widely documented that the value of a choice outcome depend…

  • Human reinforcement learning processes and biases: Computational Characterization and Possible Applications to Behavioral Public Policy

    Open Access•Stefano Palminteri•ARTICLE•Mind & Society•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 6

    The reinforcement learning framework provides a computational and behavioral foundation for understanding how agents learn to maximize rewards and minimize punishments through interaction with their environment. This framework has been widely applied across disciplines, including artificial intelligence, animal psychology, and economics. Over the last decade, a growing body of research has shown that human reinforcement learning often deviates fr…

Psychology (12 works) · Artificial Intelligence (11 works) · Cognitive psychology (11 works) · Computer Science (11 works) · Social Psychology (10 works) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 works) · Machine learning (6 works) · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 works) · Reinforcement learning (6 works) · Reinforcement (5 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae