Stefano Palminteri
Biographic Data
| ID | 1752964 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Stefano Palminteri |
| GIVEN NAMES | Stefano |
| FAMILY NAME | Palminteri |
| SIGNATURE | PALMINTERI S |
| AFFILIATIONS | Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5768-6646 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 14 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 9 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 14 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Relative Value Encoding in Large Language Models: A Multi-Task, Multi-Model Investigation
Abtract In-context learning enables large language models (LLMs) to perform a variety of tasks, including solving reinforcement learning (RL) problems. Given their potential use as (autonomous) decision-making agents, it is important to understand how these models behave in RL tasks and the extent to which they are susceptible to biases. Motivated by the fact that, in humans, it has been widely documented that the value of a choice outcome depend…
Human reinforcement learning processes and biases: Computational Characterization and Possible Applications to Behavioral Public Policy
The reinforcement learning framework provides a computational and behavioral foundation for understanding how agents learn to maximize rewards and minimize punishments through interaction with their environment. This framework has been widely applied across disciplines, including artificial intelligence, animal psychology, and economics. Over the last decade, a growing body of research has shown that human reinforcement learning often deviates fr…
Comparing experience- and description-based economic preferences across 11 countries
Author Correction: Comparing experience- and description-based economic preferences across 11 countries
Feedback-induced dispositional changes in risk preferences
Contrary to the normative decision-making standpoint, empirical studies have repeatedly reported that risk preferences are affected by the disclosure of choice outcomes (feedback). Although no consensus has yet emerged regarding the properties and mechanisms of this effect, a widespread and intuitive hypothesis is that repeated feedback affects risk preferences by means of learning, which alters the representation of subjective probabilities. Her…
Linking confidence biases to reinforcement-learning processes
We systematically misjudge our own performance in simple economic tasks. First, we generally overestimate our ability to make correct choices-a bias called overconfidence. Second, we are more confident in our choices when we seek gains than when we try to avoid losses-a bias we refer to as the valence-induced confidence bias. Strikingly, these two biases are also present in reinforcement-learning (RL) contexts, despite the fact that outcomes are …
Experiential values are underweighted in decisions involving symbolic options
The impassable gap between experiential and symbolic values
To choose between options of different natures, standard decision models presume that a single representational system ultimately indexes their subjective values on a common scale, regardless of how they are constructed. To challenge this assumption, we systematically investigated hybrid decisions between experiential options, whose value is built from past outcomes experience, and symbolic options which describe probabilistic outcomes. We show t…
Dissociation between task structure learning and performance in human model-based reinforcement learning
The multi-step learning paradigm has become the dominant paradigm to investigate the trade-off between model-free reinforcement learning – which only leverages state-action-reward associations – and model-based reinforcement learning – which additionally builds on an explicit representation of state-transitions. Experimentally, while reward values usually have to be learned by trial-and-errors, state-transitions are customarily provided by instru…
SalemGarcia_2021
We systematically misjudge our own performance in simple economic tasks. First, we generally overestimate our ability to make correct choices – a bias called overconfidence. Second, we are more confident in our choices when we seek gains than when we try to avoid losses – a bias we refer to as the valence-induced confidence bias. Strikingly, these two biases are also present in reinforcement-learning contexts, despite the fact that outcomes are p…
Context-dependent outcome encoding in human reinforcement learning
A wealth of evidence in perceptual and economic decision-making research suggests that the subjective value of one option is determined by other available options (i.e. the context). A series of studies provides evidence that the same coding principles apply to situations where decisions are shaped by past outcomes, i.e. in reinforcement-learning situations. In bandit tasks, human behavior is explained by models assuming that individuals do not l…
Information about action outcomes differentially affects learning from self-determined versus imposed choices
Assessing inter-individual differences with task-related functional neuroimaging
Behavioural and neural characterization of optimistic reinforcement learning
Behavioural and neural characterization of optimistic reinforcement learning
Human reinforcement learning processes and biases: Computational Characterization and Possible Applications to Behavioral Public Policy
The reinforcement learning framework provides a computational and behavioral foundation for understanding how agents learn to maximize rewards and minimize punishments through interaction with their environment. This framework has been widely applied across disciplines, including artificial intelligence, animal psychology, and economics. Over the last decade, a growing body of research has shown that human reinforcement learning often deviates fr…
Experiential values are underweighted in decisions involving symbolic options
Behavioural and neural characterization of optimistic reinforcement learning
Assessing inter-individual differences with task-related functional neuroimaging
Information about action outcomes differentially affects learning from self-determined versus imposed choices
SalemGarcia_2021
We systematically misjudge our own performance in simple economic tasks. First, we generally overestimate our ability to make correct choices – a bias called overconfidence. Second, we are more confident in our choices when we seek gains than when we try to avoid losses – a bias we refer to as the valence-induced confidence bias. Strikingly, these two biases are also present in reinforcement-learning contexts, despite the fact that outcomes are p…
Context-dependent outcome encoding in human reinforcement learning
A wealth of evidence in perceptual and economic decision-making research suggests that the subjective value of one option is determined by other available options (i.e. the context). A series of studies provides evidence that the same coding principles apply to situations where decisions are shaped by past outcomes, i.e. in reinforcement-learning situations. In bandit tasks, human behavior is explained by models assuming that individuals do not l…
The impassable gap between experiential and symbolic values
To choose between options of different natures, standard decision models presume that a single representational system ultimately indexes their subjective values on a common scale, regardless of how they are constructed. To challenge this assumption, we systematically investigated hybrid decisions between experiential options, whose value is built from past outcomes experience, and symbolic options which describe probabilistic outcomes. We show t…
Dissociation between task structure learning and performance in human model-based reinforcement learning
The multi-step learning paradigm has become the dominant paradigm to investigate the trade-off between model-free reinforcement learning – which only leverages state-action-reward associations – and model-based reinforcement learning – which additionally builds on an explicit representation of state-transitions. Experimentally, while reward values usually have to be learned by trial-and-errors, state-transitions are customarily provided by instru…
Feedback-induced dispositional changes in risk preferences
Contrary to the normative decision-making standpoint, empirical studies have repeatedly reported that risk preferences are affected by the disclosure of choice outcomes (feedback). Although no consensus has yet emerged regarding the properties and mechanisms of this effect, a widespread and intuitive hypothesis is that repeated feedback affects risk preferences by means of learning, which alters the representation of subjective probabilities. Her…
Linking confidence biases to reinforcement-learning processes
We systematically misjudge our own performance in simple economic tasks. First, we generally overestimate our ability to make correct choices-a bias called overconfidence. Second, we are more confident in our choices when we seek gains than when we try to avoid losses-a bias we refer to as the valence-induced confidence bias. Strikingly, these two biases are also present in reinforcement-learning (RL) contexts, despite the fact that outcomes are …
Experiential values are underweighted in decisions involving symbolic options
Comparing experience- and description-based economic preferences across 11 countries
Author Correction: Comparing experience- and description-based economic preferences across 11 countries
Relative Value Encoding in Large Language Models: A Multi-Task, Multi-Model Investigation
Abtract In-context learning enables large language models (LLMs) to perform a variety of tasks, including solving reinforcement learning (RL) problems. Given their potential use as (autonomous) decision-making agents, it is important to understand how these models behave in RL tasks and the extent to which they are susceptible to biases. Motivated by the fact that, in humans, it has been widely documented that the value of a choice outcome depend…
Human reinforcement learning processes and biases: Computational Characterization and Possible Applications to Behavioral Public Policy
The reinforcement learning framework provides a computational and behavioral foundation for understanding how agents learn to maximize rewards and minimize punishments through interaction with their environment. This framework has been widely applied across disciplines, including artificial intelligence, animal psychology, and economics. Over the last decade, a growing body of research has shown that human reinforcement learning often deviates fr…
Psychology (12 works) · Artificial Intelligence (11 works) · Cognitive psychology (11 works) · Computer Science (11 works) · Social Psychology (10 works) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 works) · Machine learning (6 works) · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 works) · Reinforcement learning (6 works) · Reinforcement (5 works)