Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Angela M Guererro

Biographic Data

ID176549
NAMEAngela M Guererro
GIVEN NAMESAngela M
FAMILY NAMEGuererro
SIGNATUREGUERERRO A M
AFFILIATIONSThe University of Queensland
ORCID0000-0002-1556-9860
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS21
TOTAL CITATIONS180
AUTHOR COUNT21
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX7
  • Joint social‐ecological outcomes of private land conservation: An evidence synthesis with a well‐being perspective

    Open Access•Erica Cseko Nolasco, Brooke A Williams et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2026

    Private land conservation (PLC) can contribute to sustainability by improving biodiversity and human well‐being but can also result in negative outcomes for people and nature if poorly designed. Informing PLC design to achieve objectives for joint biodiversity and well‐being is challenging because most evaluations assess ecological and social outcomes separately, and the outcomes vary across diverse social‐cultural contexts. Consequently, incorpo…

  • Investigating the risky dilemma of regional flood planning: The case of the Wolastoq | Saint John River Basin, Canada

    Open Access•Bridget Mcglynn, Ryan Plummer et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2024•References: 28

    Adaptive approaches to flood governance are gaining attention as climate change is expected to alter historic flooding patterns around the world. Collaboration networks are essential to adaptive governance as they create a cohesive system of diverse actors functioning across different jurisdictions and spatial levels. This research investigates the network structure of the regional collaborative governance for flood planning in the Wolastoq | Sai…

  • Unravelling how collaboration impacts success of invasive species management

    Open Access•Nisansala Abeysinghe, Christopher J O’bryan et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2023

    Invasive species cause severe threats to biodiversity and the economy, but often across multi‐actor landscapes. Therefore, collaboration among multiple actors across landscapes is often essential for managing invasive species. Deciding whether to collaborate depends on available resources and potential benefits. As such, it is vital to identify how different factors can influence the outcomes of collaborations. We developed and tested a conceptua…

  • Collaboration and individual performance during disaster response

    Open Access•Angela M Guererro, A M Guerrero et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 28

    Disasters occurring in the wake of extreme weather events are increasing in frequency and severity due to climate and anthropogenic changes and require urgent responses under uncertain and dynamic conditions. In these situations, multi-agency collaboration becomes integral to an effective response due to the need to coordinate actions across geographical scales, levels of authority and sectors of society. Consequently there is a need for more kno…

  • Assessing social-ecological fit of flood planning governance

    Open Access•Bridget Mcglynn, Ryan Plummer et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2023•Cited by: 1

    Social-ecological fit demands that governance systems align with and function at the appropriate scales of social and ecological processes being governed. While multilevel social-ecological network analysis has been applied to assess fit in various contexts, it has not yet been applied to understand transboundary flood planning. We investigate the social-ecological fit of collaborative flood planning efforts in the St. John River Basin, located i…

  • ‘Bunkering down’: How one community is tightening social‐ecological network structures in the face of global change

    Open Access•M Louise Barnes, Lorien Jasny et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2022

    Complex networks of relationships among and between people and nature (social‐ecological networks) play an important role in sustainability; yet, we have limited empirical understanding of their temporal dynamics. We empirically examine the evolution of a social‐ecological network in a common‐pool resource system faced with escalating social and environmental change over the past two decades. We first draw on quantitative and qualitative data col…

  • Reprint of: Participant engagement in environmentally focused social network research

    Open Access•Lorien Jasny, Jesse Sayles et al.•ARTICLE•Social Networks•2022•References: 13

  • Choose your collaborators wisely: Addressing interdependent tasks through collaboration in responding to wildfire disasters

    Open Access•Örjan Bodin, Angela M Guererro et al.•ARTICLE•Public Administration Review•2022•Cited by: 15•References: 12

    Responding to disastrous wildfires traversing geographical scales requires multi‐actor collaboration to address a series of interdependent operational tasks. While this type of distributed collective action problem is salient across governance contexts, less is known about if and how collaboration helps individual actors effectively address their tasks. Applying a novel network‐centric method to wildfire responder networks in Canada and Sweden, t…

  • Participant engagement in environmentally focused social network research

    Open Access•Lorien Jasny, Jesse Sayles et al.•ARTICLE•Social Networks•2021

  • Six modes of co-production for sustainability

    Open Access•Josephine M Chambers, Carina Wyborn et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Sustainability•2021•Cited by: 42•References: 29

  • Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations

    Open Access•Josephine M Chambers, Carina Wyborn et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2021•Cited by: 51•References: 18

    Co-production, the collaborative weaving of research and practice by diverse societal actors, is argued to play an important role in sustainability transformations. Yet, there is still poor understanding of how to navigate the tensions that emerge in these processes. Through analyzing 32 initiatives worldwide that co-produced knowledge and action to foster sustainable social-ecological relations, we conceptualize ‘co-productive agility’ as an eme…

  • Social determinants of adaptive and transformative responses to climate change

    Open Access•M Louise Barnes, Peng Wang et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Climate Change•2020

  • What influences and inhibits reduction of deforestation in the soy supply chain? A mental model perspective

    Open Access•Angela M Guererro, Angela M Guerrero et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 6

  • Beyond the community in participatory forest management: A governance network perspective

    Open Access•Rachel S Friedman, Rachel Friedman et al.•ARTICLE•Land Use Policy•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 63

  • Improving network approaches to the study of complex social–ecological interdependencies

    Open Access•Örjan Bodin, Steven M Alexander et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Sustainability•2019•Cited by: 19•References: 22

  • Understanding Effectiveness in its Broader Context: Assessing Case Study Methodologies for Evaluating Collaborative Conservation Governance

    Serge Clément, Angela M Guererro et al.•ARTICLE•Society & Natural Resources•2019•Cited by: 6•References: 13

    Collaborative forms of governance are increasingly favored in conservation and potentially offer a range of practical and outcome-based benefits. However, tools for critically assessing whether and how collaboration enhances the attainment of conservation objectives are lagging behind the enthusiasm. We use a framework that considers effectiveness in relation to capacity of key actors and institutions to achieve outcomes and respond to emergent p…

  • Achieving the promise of integration in social-ecological research: A review and prospectus

    Open Access•Angela M Guererro, Angela M Guerrero et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2018

    Guerrero, A. M., N. J. Bennett, K. A. Wilson, N. Carter, D. Gill, M. Mills, C. D. Ives, M. J. Selinske, C. Larrosa, S. Bekessy, F. A. Januchowski-Hartley, H. Travers, C. A. Wyborn, and A. Nuno. 2018. Achieving the promise of integration in social-ecological research: a review and prospectus. Ecology and Society 23(3):38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10232-230338

  • The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social-ecological systems

    Open Access•M Louise Barnes, Örjan Bodin et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2017•Cited by: 12

    Barnes, M. L., Ö. Bodin, A. M. Guerrero, R. J. McAllister, S. M. Alexander, and G. Robins. 2017. The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 22(4):16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09769-220416

  • Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: A Transdisciplinary Social-Ecological Network Approach for Empirical Investigations

    Open Access•Örjan Bodin, G Robins et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2016•Cited by: 12

    Bodin, Ö., G. Robins, R. R. J. McAllister, A. Guerrero, B. Crona, M. Tengö, and M. Lubell. 2016. Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: a transdisciplinary social-ecological network approach for empirical investigations. Ecology and Society 21(1):40.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08368-210140

  • From local to central: A Network Analysis of Who Manages Plant Pest and Disease Outbreaks Across Scales

    Open Access•Ryan R J Mcallister, Catherine J Robinson et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2015•Cited by: 3

    McAllister, R. R. J., C. J. Robinson, K. Maclean, A. M. Guerrero, K. Collins, B. M. Taylor, and P. J. De Barro. 2015. From local to central: a network analysis of who manages plant pest and disease outbreaks across scales. Ecology and Society 20(1): 67. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07469-200167

  • Achieving social-ecological fit through bottom-up collaborative governance: An Empirical Investigation

    Open Access•Angela M Guererro, Angela M Guerrero et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2015•Cited by: 14

    Guerrero, A. M., Ö. Bodin, R. R. J. McAllister, and K. A. Wilson. 2015. Achieving social-ecological fit through bottom-up collaborative governance: an empirical investigation. Ecology and Society 20(4):41.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08035-200441

  • Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations

    Open Access•Josephine M Chambers, Carina Wyborn et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2021•Cited by: 51•References: 18

    Co-production, the collaborative weaving of research and practice by diverse societal actors, is argued to play an important role in sustainability transformations. Yet, there is still poor understanding of how to navigate the tensions that emerge in these processes. Through analyzing 32 initiatives worldwide that co-produced knowledge and action to foster sustainable social-ecological relations, we conceptualize ‘co-productive agility’ as an eme…

  • Six modes of co-production for sustainability

    Open Access•Josephine M Chambers, Carina Wyborn et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Sustainability•2021•Cited by: 42•References: 29

  • Improving network approaches to the study of complex social–ecological interdependencies

    Open Access•Örjan Bodin, Steven M Alexander et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Sustainability•2019•Cited by: 19•References: 22

  • Choose your collaborators wisely: Addressing interdependent tasks through collaboration in responding to wildfire disasters

    Open Access•Örjan Bodin, Angela M Guererro et al.•ARTICLE•Public Administration Review•2022•Cited by: 15•References: 12

    Responding to disastrous wildfires traversing geographical scales requires multi‐actor collaboration to address a series of interdependent operational tasks. While this type of distributed collective action problem is salient across governance contexts, less is known about if and how collaboration helps individual actors effectively address their tasks. Applying a novel network‐centric method to wildfire responder networks in Canada and Sweden, t…

  • Achieving social-ecological fit through bottom-up collaborative governance: An Empirical Investigation

    Open Access•Angela M Guererro, Angela M Guerrero et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2015•Cited by: 14

    Guerrero, A. M., Ö. Bodin, R. R. J. McAllister, and K. A. Wilson. 2015. Achieving social-ecological fit through bottom-up collaborative governance: an empirical investigation. Ecology and Society 20(4):41.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08035-200441

  • The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social-ecological systems

    Open Access•M Louise Barnes, Örjan Bodin et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2017•Cited by: 12

    Barnes, M. L., Ö. Bodin, A. M. Guerrero, R. J. McAllister, S. M. Alexander, and G. Robins. 2017. The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 22(4):16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09769-220416

  • Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: A Transdisciplinary Social-Ecological Network Approach for Empirical Investigations

    Open Access•Örjan Bodin, G Robins et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2016•Cited by: 12

    Bodin, Ö., G. Robins, R. R. J. McAllister, A. Guerrero, B. Crona, M. Tengö, and M. Lubell. 2016. Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: a transdisciplinary social-ecological network approach for empirical investigations. Ecology and Society 21(1):40.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08368-210140

  • Understanding Effectiveness in its Broader Context: Assessing Case Study Methodologies for Evaluating Collaborative Conservation Governance

    Serge Clément, Angela M Guererro et al.•ARTICLE•Society & Natural Resources•2019•Cited by: 6•References: 13

    Collaborative forms of governance are increasingly favored in conservation and potentially offer a range of practical and outcome-based benefits. However, tools for critically assessing whether and how collaboration enhances the attainment of conservation objectives are lagging behind the enthusiasm. We use a framework that considers effectiveness in relation to capacity of key actors and institutions to achieve outcomes and respond to emergent p…

  • From local to central: A Network Analysis of Who Manages Plant Pest and Disease Outbreaks Across Scales

    Open Access•Ryan R J Mcallister, Catherine J Robinson et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2015•Cited by: 3

    McAllister, R. R. J., C. J. Robinson, K. Maclean, A. M. Guerrero, K. Collins, B. M. Taylor, and P. J. De Barro. 2015. From local to central: a network analysis of who manages plant pest and disease outbreaks across scales. Ecology and Society 20(1): 67. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07469-200167

  • What influences and inhibits reduction of deforestation in the soy supply chain? A mental model perspective

    Open Access•Angela M Guererro, Angela M Guerrero et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 6

  • Beyond the community in participatory forest management: A governance network perspective

    Open Access•Rachel S Friedman, Rachel Friedman et al.•ARTICLE•Land Use Policy•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 63

  • Collaboration and individual performance during disaster response

    Open Access•Angela M Guererro, A M Guerrero et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 28

    Disasters occurring in the wake of extreme weather events are increasing in frequency and severity due to climate and anthropogenic changes and require urgent responses under uncertain and dynamic conditions. In these situations, multi-agency collaboration becomes integral to an effective response due to the need to coordinate actions across geographical scales, levels of authority and sectors of society. Consequently there is a need for more kno…

  • Assessing social-ecological fit of flood planning governance

    Open Access•Bridget Mcglynn, Ryan Plummer et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2023•Cited by: 1

    Social-ecological fit demands that governance systems align with and function at the appropriate scales of social and ecological processes being governed. While multilevel social-ecological network analysis has been applied to assess fit in various contexts, it has not yet been applied to understand transboundary flood planning. We investigate the social-ecological fit of collaborative flood planning efforts in the St. John River Basin, located i…

  • From local to central: A Network Analysis of Who Manages Plant Pest and Disease Outbreaks Across Scales

    Open Access•Ryan R J Mcallister, Catherine J Robinson et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2015•Cited by: 3

    McAllister, R. R. J., C. J. Robinson, K. Maclean, A. M. Guerrero, K. Collins, B. M. Taylor, and P. J. De Barro. 2015. From local to central: a network analysis of who manages plant pest and disease outbreaks across scales. Ecology and Society 20(1): 67. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07469-200167

  • Achieving social-ecological fit through bottom-up collaborative governance: An Empirical Investigation

    Open Access•Angela M Guererro, Angela M Guerrero et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2015•Cited by: 14

    Guerrero, A. M., Ö. Bodin, R. R. J. McAllister, and K. A. Wilson. 2015. Achieving social-ecological fit through bottom-up collaborative governance: an empirical investigation. Ecology and Society 20(4):41.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08035-200441

  • Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: A Transdisciplinary Social-Ecological Network Approach for Empirical Investigations

    Open Access•Örjan Bodin, G Robins et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2016•Cited by: 12

    Bodin, Ö., G. Robins, R. R. J. McAllister, A. Guerrero, B. Crona, M. Tengö, and M. Lubell. 2016. Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: a transdisciplinary social-ecological network approach for empirical investigations. Ecology and Society 21(1):40.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08368-210140

  • The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social-ecological systems

    Open Access•M Louise Barnes, Örjan Bodin et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2017•Cited by: 12

    Barnes, M. L., Ö. Bodin, A. M. Guerrero, R. J. McAllister, S. M. Alexander, and G. Robins. 2017. The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 22(4):16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09769-220416

  • Achieving the promise of integration in social-ecological research: A review and prospectus

    Open Access•Angela M Guererro, Angela M Guerrero et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2018

    Guerrero, A. M., N. J. Bennett, K. A. Wilson, N. Carter, D. Gill, M. Mills, C. D. Ives, M. J. Selinske, C. Larrosa, S. Bekessy, F. A. Januchowski-Hartley, H. Travers, C. A. Wyborn, and A. Nuno. 2018. Achieving the promise of integration in social-ecological research: a review and prospectus. Ecology and Society 23(3):38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10232-230338

  • Improving network approaches to the study of complex social–ecological interdependencies

    Open Access•Örjan Bodin, Steven M Alexander et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Sustainability•2019•Cited by: 19•References: 22

  • Understanding Effectiveness in its Broader Context: Assessing Case Study Methodologies for Evaluating Collaborative Conservation Governance

    Serge Clément, Angela M Guererro et al.•ARTICLE•Society & Natural Resources•2019•Cited by: 6•References: 13

    Collaborative forms of governance are increasingly favored in conservation and potentially offer a range of practical and outcome-based benefits. However, tools for critically assessing whether and how collaboration enhances the attainment of conservation objectives are lagging behind the enthusiasm. We use a framework that considers effectiveness in relation to capacity of key actors and institutions to achieve outcomes and respond to emergent p…

  • Social determinants of adaptive and transformative responses to climate change

    Open Access•M Louise Barnes, Peng Wang et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Climate Change•2020

  • What influences and inhibits reduction of deforestation in the soy supply chain? A mental model perspective

    Open Access•Angela M Guererro, Angela M Guerrero et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 6

  • Beyond the community in participatory forest management: A governance network perspective

    Open Access•Rachel S Friedman, Rachel Friedman et al.•ARTICLE•Land Use Policy•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 63

  • Participant engagement in environmentally focused social network research

    Open Access•Lorien Jasny, Jesse Sayles et al.•ARTICLE•Social Networks•2021

  • Six modes of co-production for sustainability

    Open Access•Josephine M Chambers, Carina Wyborn et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Sustainability•2021•Cited by: 42•References: 29

  • Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations

    Open Access•Josephine M Chambers, Carina Wyborn et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2021•Cited by: 51•References: 18

    Co-production, the collaborative weaving of research and practice by diverse societal actors, is argued to play an important role in sustainability transformations. Yet, there is still poor understanding of how to navigate the tensions that emerge in these processes. Through analyzing 32 initiatives worldwide that co-produced knowledge and action to foster sustainable social-ecological relations, we conceptualize ‘co-productive agility’ as an eme…

  • ‘Bunkering down’: How one community is tightening social‐ecological network structures in the face of global change

    Open Access•M Louise Barnes, Lorien Jasny et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2022

    Complex networks of relationships among and between people and nature (social‐ecological networks) play an important role in sustainability; yet, we have limited empirical understanding of their temporal dynamics. We empirically examine the evolution of a social‐ecological network in a common‐pool resource system faced with escalating social and environmental change over the past two decades. We first draw on quantitative and qualitative data col…

  • Reprint of: Participant engagement in environmentally focused social network research

    Open Access•Lorien Jasny, Jesse Sayles et al.•ARTICLE•Social Networks•2022•References: 13

  • Choose your collaborators wisely: Addressing interdependent tasks through collaboration in responding to wildfire disasters

    Open Access•Örjan Bodin, Angela M Guererro et al.•ARTICLE•Public Administration Review•2022•Cited by: 15•References: 12

    Responding to disastrous wildfires traversing geographical scales requires multi‐actor collaboration to address a series of interdependent operational tasks. While this type of distributed collective action problem is salient across governance contexts, less is known about if and how collaboration helps individual actors effectively address their tasks. Applying a novel network‐centric method to wildfire responder networks in Canada and Sweden, t…

  • Unravelling how collaboration impacts success of invasive species management

    Open Access•Nisansala Abeysinghe, Christopher J O’bryan et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2023

    Invasive species cause severe threats to biodiversity and the economy, but often across multi‐actor landscapes. Therefore, collaboration among multiple actors across landscapes is often essential for managing invasive species. Deciding whether to collaborate depends on available resources and potential benefits. As such, it is vital to identify how different factors can influence the outcomes of collaborations. We developed and tested a conceptua…

  • Collaboration and individual performance during disaster response

    Open Access•Angela M Guererro, A M Guerrero et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 28

    Disasters occurring in the wake of extreme weather events are increasing in frequency and severity due to climate and anthropogenic changes and require urgent responses under uncertain and dynamic conditions. In these situations, multi-agency collaboration becomes integral to an effective response due to the need to coordinate actions across geographical scales, levels of authority and sectors of society. Consequently there is a need for more kno…

  • Assessing social-ecological fit of flood planning governance

    Open Access•Bridget Mcglynn, Ryan Plummer et al.•ARTICLE•Conservation Ecology•2023•Cited by: 1

    Social-ecological fit demands that governance systems align with and function at the appropriate scales of social and ecological processes being governed. While multilevel social-ecological network analysis has been applied to assess fit in various contexts, it has not yet been applied to understand transboundary flood planning. We investigate the social-ecological fit of collaborative flood planning efforts in the St. John River Basin, located i…

  • Investigating the risky dilemma of regional flood planning: The case of the Wolastoq | Saint John River Basin, Canada

    Open Access•Bridget Mcglynn, Ryan Plummer et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2024•References: 28

    Adaptive approaches to flood governance are gaining attention as climate change is expected to alter historic flooding patterns around the world. Collaboration networks are essential to adaptive governance as they create a cohesive system of diverse actors functioning across different jurisdictions and spatial levels. This research investigates the network structure of the regional collaborative governance for flood planning in the Wolastoq | Sai…

  • Joint social‐ecological outcomes of private land conservation: An evidence synthesis with a well‐being perspective

    Open Access•Erica Cseko Nolasco, Brooke A Williams et al.•ARTICLE•People and Nature•2026

    Private land conservation (PLC) can contribute to sustainability by improving biodiversity and human well‐being but can also result in negative outcomes for people and nature if poorly designed. Informing PLC design to achieve objectives for joint biodiversity and well‐being is challenging because most evaluations assess ecological and social outcomes separately, and the outcomes vary across diverse social‐cultural contexts. Consequently, incorpo…

Sociology (12 works) · Ecology (11 works) · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (11 works) · Business (10 works) · Environmental resource management (10 works) · Computer Science (9 works) · Geography (9 works) · Political science (9 works) · Social science (7 works) · Biology (6 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae