Glenn J Scheyd
Biographic Data
| ID | 184992 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Glenn J Scheyd |
| GIVEN NAMES | Glenn J |
| FAMILY NAME | Scheyd |
| SIGNATURE | SCHEYD G J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of New Mexico |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 72 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2000 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The Evolution of Human Physical Attractiveness
Everywhere the issue has been examined, people make discriminations about others' physical attractiveness. Can human standards of physical attractiveness be understood through the lens of evolutionary biology? In the past decade, this question has guided much theoretical and empirical work. In this paper, we (a) outline the basic adaptationist approach that has guided the bulk of this work, (b) describe evolutionary models of signaling that have …
Incompatible with evolutionary theorizing
Comments on the article by A. H. Eagly and W. Wood (see record 1999-05337-002) which examined the origins of sex differences in human behavior. Eagly and Wood argued that social structural theory can explain the origin of psychological sex differences. The present article discusses conceptual problems which render Eagly and Wood's theory implausible. The authors see the social structuralists' dualistic interpretation of the origin of human traits…
Incompatible with evolutionary theorizing
The Evolution of Human Physical Attractiveness
Everywhere the issue has been examined, people make discriminations about others' physical attractiveness. Can human standards of physical attractiveness be understood through the lens of evolutionary biology? In the past decade, this question has guided much theoretical and empirical work. In this paper, we (a) outline the basic adaptationist approach that has guided the bulk of this work, (b) describe evolutionary models of signaling that have …
Incompatible with evolutionary theorizing
Comments on the article by A. H. Eagly and W. Wood (see record 1999-05337-002) which examined the origins of sex differences in human behavior. Eagly and Wood argued that social structural theory can explain the origin of psychological sex differences. The present article discusses conceptual problems which render Eagly and Wood's theory implausible. The authors see the social structuralists' dualistic interpretation of the origin of human traits…
Incompatible with evolutionary theorizing
The Evolution of Human Physical Attractiveness
Everywhere the issue has been examined, people make discriminations about others' physical attractiveness. Can human standards of physical attractiveness be understood through the lens of evolutionary biology? In the past decade, this question has guided much theoretical and empirical work. In this paper, we (a) outline the basic adaptationist approach that has guided the bulk of this work, (b) describe evolutionary models of signaling that have …
Epistemology (3 works) · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Cognitive science (2 works) · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (2 works) · Evolutionary psychology (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Attractiveness (1 works)