Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ben Colburn

Biographic Data

ID184994
NAMEBen Colburn
GIVEN NAMESBen
FAMILY NAMEColburn
SIGNATUREBEN COLBURN
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Cambridge
ORCID0000-0003-1416-1844
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS13
TOTAL CITATIONS27
AUTHOR COUNT12
EDITOR COUNT1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2007
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2
  • Palliative care‐based arguments against assisted dying

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Bioethics•2025

    Opponents of legalised assisted dying often assert that palliative care is worse in countries where assisted dying has been legalised, and imply that legalised assisted dying makes palliative care worse. This study considers five versions of this claim: that it is difficulty to access expert palliative care in countries where assisted dying has been legalised, that those countries rank low in their quality of end‐of‐life care; that legalising ass…

  • Dramatic Vignettes in Moral Inquiry

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Social Analysis•2023

    Anthropologists and philosophers have typically been skeptical about the use of dramatic vignettes in the study of ethics, in particular targeting three characteristic features of such devices-stylization, simplification, and selectivity-and arguing that they undermine ethical inquiry. I argue that this skepticism misconstrues the aims of arguments that incorporate such devices. Rather than seeing them as botched attempts at historical or scienti…

  • The Routledge Handbook of Autonomy

    Ben Colburn•BOOK•Routledge Handbook of Autonomy•2022

    Our values change. What we value, want, desire, prefer, and how much; for nearly everyone, these will be different at different times in their life. These changes can be gradual or abrupt; they can be long-lasting or short-lived; and they can be induced by forces outside yourself or they can come from within or they can have no specific catalyst at all. Such preference change raises a number of questions for our theorising about rational choice, …

  • Disability‐based arguments against assisted dying laws

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Bioethics•2022

    Some of the most common arguments against legalizing assisted dying are based on appealing to the rights of people with disabilities. This article identifies and responds to those arguments, including that people with disabilities univocally oppose assisted dying laws; that those laws harm people with disabilities, or show disrespect; and that those laws undermine other vital aspects of healthcare. Drawing on philosophical argument, as well as on…

  • Routledge Handbook of Autonomy

    Ben Colburn•BOOK•Routledge Handbook of Autonomy•2022

  • Hypothetical Insurance and Higher Education: Hypothetical Insurance and Higher Education

    Open Access•Ben Colburn, Hugh Lazenby•ARTICLE•Journal of Philosophy of Education•2015•References: 6

    What level of government subsidy of higher education is justified, in what form, and for what reasons?We answer these questions by applying the hypothetical insurance approach, originally developed by Ronald Dworkin in his work on distributive justice.On this approach, when asking how to fund and deliver public services in a particular domain, we should seek to model what would be the outcome of a hypothetical insurance market: we stipulate that …

  • Responsibility and School Choice in Education: Responsibility and School Choice in Education

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Journal of Philosophy of Education•2012•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Consider the following argument for school choice, based on an appeal to the virtues of the market: allowing parents some measure of choice over their particular children’s education ultimately serves the interests of all children, because creating a market mechanism in state education will produce improvements through the same pressures that lead to greater efficiency and quality when markets are deployed in more familiar contexts. The argument …

  • Autonomy and Adaptive Preferences

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2011•Cited by: 17•References: 1

    Adaptive preference formation is the unconscious altering of our preferences in light of the options we have available. Jon Elster has argued that this is bad because it undermines our autonomy. I agree, but think that Elster's explanation of why is lacking. So, I draw on a richer account of autonomy to give the following answer. Preferences formed through adaptation are characterized by covert influence (that is, explanations of which an agent h…

  • Autonomy and Liberalism

    Ben Colburn•BOOK•Autonomy and liberalism•2010

    "This book concerns the foundations and implications of a particular form of liberal political theory. Colburn argues that one should see liberalism as a political theory committed to the value of autonomy, understood as consisting in an agent deciding for oneself what is valuable and living life in accordance with that decision. Understanding liberalism this way offers solutions to various problems that beset liberal political theory, on various…

  • Anti-Perfectionisms and autonomy

    Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Analysis•2010

    Journal Article Anti-Perfectionisms and autonomy Get access Ben Colburn Ben Colburn Corpus Christi College Cambridge CB2 1RH, UK [email protected] Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Analysis, Volume 70, Issue 2, April 2010, Pages 247–256, https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp171 Published: 12 January 2010

  • The legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy

    Matthew H Kramer, Claire Grant et al.•BOOK•The legacy of H.L.A. Hart•2008

    This text brings together contributions from 18 of the world's foremost legal and political philosophers to examine the lasting influence of H.L.A. Hart. The essays explore the major subjects of Hart's work: general jurisprudence, criminal responsibility rights, justice, causation and the foundations of liberalism.

  • Forbidden Ways of Life

    Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    I examine an objection against autonomy-minded liberalism sometimes made by philosophers such as John Rawls and William Galston, that it rules out ways of life which do not themselves value freedom or autonomy. This objection is incorrect, because one need not value autonomy in order to live an autonomous life. Hence autonomy-minded liberalism need not rule out such ways of life. I suggest a modified objection which does work, namely that autonom…

  • Debate: The Concept of Voluntariness

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Philosophy•2007•Cited by: 8

    IN her work on the distinction between freedom and voluntariness, Serena Olsaretti suggests the following definition of voluntary action: an action is voluntary if it is not non-voluntary, and non-voluntary if it is performed because there are no acceptable alternatives, where ‘acceptable’ means conforming to some objective standard (which Olsaretti suggests might be well-being). \n \nOlsaretti suggests that ascriptions of responsibility are unde…

  • Autonomy and Adaptive Preferences

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2011•Cited by: 17•References: 1

    Adaptive preference formation is the unconscious altering of our preferences in light of the options we have available. Jon Elster has argued that this is bad because it undermines our autonomy. I agree, but think that Elster's explanation of why is lacking. So, I draw on a richer account of autonomy to give the following answer. Preferences formed through adaptation are characterized by covert influence (that is, explanations of which an agent h…

  • Debate: The Concept of Voluntariness

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Philosophy•2007•Cited by: 8

    IN her work on the distinction between freedom and voluntariness, Serena Olsaretti suggests the following definition of voluntary action: an action is voluntary if it is not non-voluntary, and non-voluntary if it is performed because there are no acceptable alternatives, where ‘acceptable’ means conforming to some objective standard (which Olsaretti suggests might be well-being). \n \nOlsaretti suggests that ascriptions of responsibility are unde…

  • Responsibility and School Choice in Education: Responsibility and School Choice in Education

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Journal of Philosophy of Education•2012•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Consider the following argument for school choice, based on an appeal to the virtues of the market: allowing parents some measure of choice over their particular children’s education ultimately serves the interests of all children, because creating a market mechanism in state education will produce improvements through the same pressures that lead to greater efficiency and quality when markets are deployed in more familiar contexts. The argument …

  • Forbidden Ways of Life

    Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    I examine an objection against autonomy-minded liberalism sometimes made by philosophers such as John Rawls and William Galston, that it rules out ways of life which do not themselves value freedom or autonomy. This objection is incorrect, because one need not value autonomy in order to live an autonomous life. Hence autonomy-minded liberalism need not rule out such ways of life. I suggest a modified objection which does work, namely that autonom…

  • Debate: The Concept of Voluntariness

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Philosophy•2007•Cited by: 8

    IN her work on the distinction between freedom and voluntariness, Serena Olsaretti suggests the following definition of voluntary action: an action is voluntary if it is not non-voluntary, and non-voluntary if it is performed because there are no acceptable alternatives, where ‘acceptable’ means conforming to some objective standard (which Olsaretti suggests might be well-being). \n \nOlsaretti suggests that ascriptions of responsibility are unde…

  • The legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy

    Matthew H Kramer, Claire Grant et al.•BOOK•The legacy of H.L.A. Hart•2008

    This text brings together contributions from 18 of the world's foremost legal and political philosophers to examine the lasting influence of H.L.A. Hart. The essays explore the major subjects of Hart's work: general jurisprudence, criminal responsibility rights, justice, causation and the foundations of liberalism.

  • Forbidden Ways of Life

    Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    I examine an objection against autonomy-minded liberalism sometimes made by philosophers such as John Rawls and William Galston, that it rules out ways of life which do not themselves value freedom or autonomy. This objection is incorrect, because one need not value autonomy in order to live an autonomous life. Hence autonomy-minded liberalism need not rule out such ways of life. I suggest a modified objection which does work, namely that autonom…

  • Autonomy and Liberalism

    Ben Colburn•BOOK•Autonomy and liberalism•2010

    "This book concerns the foundations and implications of a particular form of liberal political theory. Colburn argues that one should see liberalism as a political theory committed to the value of autonomy, understood as consisting in an agent deciding for oneself what is valuable and living life in accordance with that decision. Understanding liberalism this way offers solutions to various problems that beset liberal political theory, on various…

  • Anti-Perfectionisms and autonomy

    Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Analysis•2010

    Journal Article Anti-Perfectionisms and autonomy Get access Ben Colburn Ben Colburn Corpus Christi College Cambridge CB2 1RH, UK [email protected] Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Analysis, Volume 70, Issue 2, April 2010, Pages 247–256, https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp171 Published: 12 January 2010

  • Autonomy and Adaptive Preferences

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2011•Cited by: 17•References: 1

    Adaptive preference formation is the unconscious altering of our preferences in light of the options we have available. Jon Elster has argued that this is bad because it undermines our autonomy. I agree, but think that Elster's explanation of why is lacking. So, I draw on a richer account of autonomy to give the following answer. Preferences formed through adaptation are characterized by covert influence (that is, explanations of which an agent h…

  • Responsibility and School Choice in Education: Responsibility and School Choice in Education

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Journal of Philosophy of Education•2012•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Consider the following argument for school choice, based on an appeal to the virtues of the market: allowing parents some measure of choice over their particular children’s education ultimately serves the interests of all children, because creating a market mechanism in state education will produce improvements through the same pressures that lead to greater efficiency and quality when markets are deployed in more familiar contexts. The argument …

  • Hypothetical Insurance and Higher Education: Hypothetical Insurance and Higher Education

    Open Access•Ben Colburn, Hugh Lazenby•ARTICLE•Journal of Philosophy of Education•2015•References: 6

    What level of government subsidy of higher education is justified, in what form, and for what reasons?We answer these questions by applying the hypothetical insurance approach, originally developed by Ronald Dworkin in his work on distributive justice.On this approach, when asking how to fund and deliver public services in a particular domain, we should seek to model what would be the outcome of a hypothetical insurance market: we stipulate that …

  • The Routledge Handbook of Autonomy

    Ben Colburn•BOOK•Routledge Handbook of Autonomy•2022

    Our values change. What we value, want, desire, prefer, and how much; for nearly everyone, these will be different at different times in their life. These changes can be gradual or abrupt; they can be long-lasting or short-lived; and they can be induced by forces outside yourself or they can come from within or they can have no specific catalyst at all. Such preference change raises a number of questions for our theorising about rational choice, …

  • Disability‐based arguments against assisted dying laws

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Bioethics•2022

    Some of the most common arguments against legalizing assisted dying are based on appealing to the rights of people with disabilities. This article identifies and responds to those arguments, including that people with disabilities univocally oppose assisted dying laws; that those laws harm people with disabilities, or show disrespect; and that those laws undermine other vital aspects of healthcare. Drawing on philosophical argument, as well as on…

  • Routledge Handbook of Autonomy

    Ben Colburn•BOOK•Routledge Handbook of Autonomy•2022

  • Dramatic Vignettes in Moral Inquiry

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Social Analysis•2023

    Anthropologists and philosophers have typically been skeptical about the use of dramatic vignettes in the study of ethics, in particular targeting three characteristic features of such devices-stylization, simplification, and selectivity-and arguing that they undermine ethical inquiry. I argue that this skepticism misconstrues the aims of arguments that incorporate such devices. Rather than seeing them as botched attempts at historical or scienti…

  • Palliative care‐based arguments against assisted dying

    Open Access•Ben Colburn•ARTICLE•Bioethics•2025

    Opponents of legalised assisted dying often assert that palliative care is worse in countries where assisted dying has been legalised, and imply that legalised assisted dying makes palliative care worse. This study considers five versions of this claim: that it is difficulty to access expert palliative care in countries where assisted dying has been legalised, that those countries rank low in their quality of end‐of‐life care; that legalising ass…

Political science (9 works) · Law (7 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Autonomy (5 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Economics (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae