Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Olmo R Van Den Akker

Biographic Data

ID1860453
NAMEOlmo R Van Den Akker
GIVEN NAMESOlmo R Van Den
FAMILY NAMEAkker
SIGNATUREVAN DEN AKKER O R
AFFILIATIONSTilburg University
ORCID0000-0002-0712-3746
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS28
WORKS AS AUTHOR5
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2018
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX3
  • How do psychology researchers interpret the results of multiple replication studies

    Open Access•Olmo R Van Den Akker, Jelte M Wicherts et al.•ARTICLE•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2023

    Employing two vignette studies, we examined how psychology researchers interpret the results of a set of four experiments that all test a given theory. In both studies, we found that participants’ belief in the theory increased with the number of statistically significant results, and that the result of a direct replication had a stronger effect on belief in the theory than the result of a conceptual replication. In Study 2, we additionally found…

  • A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being

    Open Access•Suzanne Hoogeveen, Alexandra Sarafoglou et al.•ARTICLE•Religion Brain & Behavior•2023

    The relation between religiosity and well-being is one of the most researched topics in the psychology of religion, yet the directionality and robustness of the effect remains debated. Here, we adopted a many-analysts approach to assess the robustness of this relation based on a new cross-cultural dataset (N=10,535 participants from 24 countries). We recruited 120 analysis teams to investigate (1) whether religious people self-report higher well-…

  • A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms

    Open Access•Sam Parsons, Flavio Azevedo et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2022•Cited by: 6•References: 5

    Open scholarship has transformed research, and introduced a host of new terms in the lexicon of researchers. The ‘Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Teaching’ (FORRT) community presents a crowdsourced glossary of open scholarship terms to facilitate education and effective communication between experts and newcomers

  • Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness

    Open Access•Olmo R Van Den Akker, M A L M Van Assen et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Economic Psychology•2020•Cited by: 9•References: 195

    We present a meta-analytic review of the literature on sex differences in the trust game (174 effect sizes) and the related gift-exchange game (35 effect sizes). Based on parental investment theory and social role theory we expected men to be more trusting and women to be more trustworthy. Indeed, men were more trusting in the trust game (g = 0.22), yet we found no significant sex difference in trust in the gift-exchange game (g = 0.15). Regardin…

  • Kin terms and fitness interdependence

    Open Access•L Cronk, Dieter Steklis et al.•ARTICLE•Evolution and Human Behavior•2018•Cited by: 13•References: 41

  • Kin terms and fitness interdependence

    Open Access•L Cronk, Dieter Steklis et al.•ARTICLE•Evolution and Human Behavior•2018•Cited by: 13•References: 41

  • Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness

    Open Access•Olmo R Van Den Akker, M A L M Van Assen et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Economic Psychology•2020•Cited by: 9•References: 195

    We present a meta-analytic review of the literature on sex differences in the trust game (174 effect sizes) and the related gift-exchange game (35 effect sizes). Based on parental investment theory and social role theory we expected men to be more trusting and women to be more trustworthy. Indeed, men were more trusting in the trust game (g = 0.22), yet we found no significant sex difference in trust in the gift-exchange game (g = 0.15). Regardin…

  • A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms

    Open Access•Sam Parsons, Flavio Azevedo et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2022•Cited by: 6•References: 5

    Open scholarship has transformed research, and introduced a host of new terms in the lexicon of researchers. The ‘Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Teaching’ (FORRT) community presents a crowdsourced glossary of open scholarship terms to facilitate education and effective communication between experts and newcomers

  • Kin terms and fitness interdependence

    Open Access•L Cronk, Dieter Steklis et al.•ARTICLE•Evolution and Human Behavior•2018•Cited by: 13•References: 41

  • Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness

    Open Access•Olmo R Van Den Akker, M A L M Van Assen et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Economic Psychology•2020•Cited by: 9•References: 195

    We present a meta-analytic review of the literature on sex differences in the trust game (174 effect sizes) and the related gift-exchange game (35 effect sizes). Based on parental investment theory and social role theory we expected men to be more trusting and women to be more trustworthy. Indeed, men were more trusting in the trust game (g = 0.22), yet we found no significant sex difference in trust in the gift-exchange game (g = 0.15). Regardin…

  • A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms

    Open Access•Sam Parsons, Flavio Azevedo et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2022•Cited by: 6•References: 5

    Open scholarship has transformed research, and introduced a host of new terms in the lexicon of researchers. The ‘Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Teaching’ (FORRT) community presents a crowdsourced glossary of open scholarship terms to facilitate education and effective communication between experts and newcomers

  • How do psychology researchers interpret the results of multiple replication studies

    Open Access•Olmo R Van Den Akker, Jelte M Wicherts et al.•ARTICLE•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2023

    Employing two vignette studies, we examined how psychology researchers interpret the results of a set of four experiments that all test a given theory. In both studies, we found that participants’ belief in the theory increased with the number of statistically significant results, and that the result of a direct replication had a stronger effect on belief in the theory than the result of a conceptual replication. In Study 2, we additionally found…

  • A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being

    Open Access•Suzanne Hoogeveen, Alexandra Sarafoglou et al.•ARTICLE•Religion Brain & Behavior•2023

    The relation between religiosity and well-being is one of the most researched topics in the psychology of religion, yet the directionality and robustness of the effect remains debated. Here, we adopted a many-analysts approach to assess the robustness of this relation based on a new cross-cultural dataset (N=10,535 participants from 24 countries). We recruited 120 analysis teams to investigate (1) whether religious people self-report higher well-…

Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 works) · Altruism (1 work) · Cognition (1 work) · Cognitive psychology (1 work) · Cognitive science (1 work) · Cultural Differences and Values (1 work) · Data mining (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae