Matthew B Kugler
Biographic Data
| ID | 189632 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Matthew B Kugler |
| GIVEN NAMES | Matthew B |
| FAMILY NAME | Kugler |
| SIGNATURE | KUGLER M B |
| AFFILIATIONS | Princeton University |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-4614-4619 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 100 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2006 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
Surveillance Duration Doesn't Affect Privacy Expectations: An Empirical Test of the Mosaic Theory
Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in "Moral" Intuitions
Group-Based Dominance and Opposition to Equality Correspond to Different Psychological Motives
Social Influence on Political Judgments: The Case of Presidential Debates
Four experiments investigated the extent to which judgments of candidate performance in presidential debates could be influenced by the mere knowledge of others’ reactions. In Experiments 1 and 2 participants watched an intact version of a debate or an edited version in which either “soundbite” one‐liners or the audience reaction to those soundbites were removed. In Experiment 3 participants saw what was supposedly the reaction of their fellow pa…
Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot
Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in "Moral" Intuitions
Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot
Social Influence on Political Judgments: The Case of Presidential Debates
Four experiments investigated the extent to which judgments of candidate performance in presidential debates could be influenced by the mere knowledge of others’ reactions. In Experiments 1 and 2 participants watched an intact version of a debate or an edited version in which either “soundbite” one‐liners or the audience reaction to those soundbites were removed. In Experiment 3 participants saw what was supposedly the reaction of their fellow pa…
Group-Based Dominance and Opposition to Equality Correspond to Different Psychological Motives
Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot
Social Influence on Political Judgments: The Case of Presidential Debates
Four experiments investigated the extent to which judgments of candidate performance in presidential debates could be influenced by the mere knowledge of others’ reactions. In Experiments 1 and 2 participants watched an intact version of a debate or an edited version in which either “soundbite” one‐liners or the audience reaction to those soundbites were removed. In Experiment 3 participants saw what was supposedly the reaction of their fellow pa…
Group-Based Dominance and Opposition to Equality Correspond to Different Psychological Motives
Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in "Moral" Intuitions
Surveillance Duration Doesn't Affect Privacy Expectations: An Empirical Test of the Mosaic Theory
Psychology (5 works) · Social Psychology (5 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Cultural Differences and Values (2 works) · Democracy (2 works) · Ideology (2 works) · Ingroups and outgroups (2 works)