Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Alina Salmen

Biographic Data

ID197862
NAMEAlina Salmen
GIVEN NAMESAlina
FAMILY NAMESalmen
SIGNATURESALMEN A
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Kent
ORCID0000-0003-2261-6888
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS14
AUTHOR COUNT5
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX2
  • Selective Moral Leniency Toward Culturally Embedded Animal Exploitation

    Open Access•Kristof Dhont, Ana C Leite et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2026

    Moral concern for animals is widely endorsed, yet people appear to make exceptions for practices of animal exploitation rooted in their own cultural traditions. In two studies (total N = 1,318), we tested whether support for culturally embedded practices of animal exploitation varies with cultural ingroup-outgroup origin as well as with ideological and identity-based factors. Across the United States (Study 1), Norway, Spain, and Australia (Study…

  • Masculinity Perceptions and Hostile Sexism Shape Evaluations of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives

    Open Access•Alina Salmen, Nadira S Faber et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2025

    Plant-based meat alternatives could play an important role in reducing global meat consumption. We argue, however, that psychological obstacles related to masculinity perceptions and sexist beliefs may hinder the acceptance of meat alternatives. Across two experiments (Experiment 1, N = 216 U.K. students; Experiment 2, N = 1,182 U.S. residents), omnivores rated identical images of dishes more negatively when labeled as plant-based rather than as …

  • Individual Differences in Effective Animal Advocacy

    Open Access•Joachim Stoeber, Kristof Dhont et al.•ARTICLE•Anthrozoös•2024•Cited by: 2•References: 28

    The present research examined whether personality and individual differences have practical implications for effective animal advocacy (i.e., how effective an animal advocacy message is) by exploring whether individual differences in gender identity, social dominance orientation, and speciesism moderate the effects of advocacy. An online study was conducted employing an experimental design (advocacy vs. control condition). 495 participants (120 m…

  • The Moral Divide Between High- and Low-Status Animals

    Open Access•Victoria C Krings, Kristof Dhont et al.•ARTICLE•Anthrozoös•2021•Cited by: 8•References: 32

    People endorsing stronger beliefs in human supremacy over animals typically show less moral concern for animals. Yet how people think about different types of animals also depends on the role of the animals in society. For instance, people are less concerned about food animals than about companion animals. It is unclear, however, how human supremacy beliefs relate to this perceived moral divide between different types of animals. In two survey st…

  • Hostile and benevolent sexism

    Open Access•Alina Salmen, Kristof Dhont•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2020•Cited by: 4•References: 16

    Scholars have long argued that sexism is partly rooted in dominance motives over animals and nature, with women being perceived as more animal-like and more closely connected to nature than men. Yet systematic research investigating these associations is currently lacking. Five studies ( N = 2,409) consistently show that stronger beliefs in human supremacy over animals and nature were related to heightened hostile and benevolent sexism. Furthermo…

  • The Moral Divide Between High- and Low-Status Animals

    Open Access•Victoria C Krings, Kristof Dhont et al.•ARTICLE•Anthrozoös•2021•Cited by: 8•References: 32

    People endorsing stronger beliefs in human supremacy over animals typically show less moral concern for animals. Yet how people think about different types of animals also depends on the role of the animals in society. For instance, people are less concerned about food animals than about companion animals. It is unclear, however, how human supremacy beliefs relate to this perceived moral divide between different types of animals. In two survey st…

  • Hostile and benevolent sexism

    Open Access•Alina Salmen, Kristof Dhont•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2020•Cited by: 4•References: 16

    Scholars have long argued that sexism is partly rooted in dominance motives over animals and nature, with women being perceived as more animal-like and more closely connected to nature than men. Yet systematic research investigating these associations is currently lacking. Five studies ( N = 2,409) consistently show that stronger beliefs in human supremacy over animals and nature were related to heightened hostile and benevolent sexism. Furthermo…

  • Individual Differences in Effective Animal Advocacy

    Open Access•Joachim Stoeber, Kristof Dhont et al.•ARTICLE•Anthrozoös•2024•Cited by: 2•References: 28

    The present research examined whether personality and individual differences have practical implications for effective animal advocacy (i.e., how effective an animal advocacy message is) by exploring whether individual differences in gender identity, social dominance orientation, and speciesism moderate the effects of advocacy. An online study was conducted employing an experimental design (advocacy vs. control condition). 495 participants (120 m…

  • Hostile and benevolent sexism

    Open Access•Alina Salmen, Kristof Dhont•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2020•Cited by: 4•References: 16

    Scholars have long argued that sexism is partly rooted in dominance motives over animals and nature, with women being perceived as more animal-like and more closely connected to nature than men. Yet systematic research investigating these associations is currently lacking. Five studies ( N = 2,409) consistently show that stronger beliefs in human supremacy over animals and nature were related to heightened hostile and benevolent sexism. Furthermo…

  • The Moral Divide Between High- and Low-Status Animals

    Open Access•Victoria C Krings, Kristof Dhont et al.•ARTICLE•Anthrozoös•2021•Cited by: 8•References: 32

    People endorsing stronger beliefs in human supremacy over animals typically show less moral concern for animals. Yet how people think about different types of animals also depends on the role of the animals in society. For instance, people are less concerned about food animals than about companion animals. It is unclear, however, how human supremacy beliefs relate to this perceived moral divide between different types of animals. In two survey st…

  • Individual Differences in Effective Animal Advocacy

    Open Access•Joachim Stoeber, Kristof Dhont et al.•ARTICLE•Anthrozoös•2024•Cited by: 2•References: 28

    The present research examined whether personality and individual differences have practical implications for effective animal advocacy (i.e., how effective an animal advocacy message is) by exploring whether individual differences in gender identity, social dominance orientation, and speciesism moderate the effects of advocacy. An online study was conducted employing an experimental design (advocacy vs. control condition). 495 participants (120 m…

  • Masculinity Perceptions and Hostile Sexism Shape Evaluations of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives

    Open Access•Alina Salmen, Nadira S Faber et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2025

    Plant-based meat alternatives could play an important role in reducing global meat consumption. We argue, however, that psychological obstacles related to masculinity perceptions and sexist beliefs may hinder the acceptance of meat alternatives. Across two experiments (Experiment 1, N = 216 U.K. students; Experiment 2, N = 1,182 U.S. residents), omnivores rated identical images of dishes more negatively when labeled as plant-based rather than as …

  • Selective Moral Leniency Toward Culturally Embedded Animal Exploitation

    Open Access•Kristof Dhont, Ana C Leite et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2026

    Moral concern for animals is widely endorsed, yet people appear to make exceptions for practices of animal exploitation rooted in their own cultural traditions. In two studies (total N = 1,318), we tested whether support for culturally embedded practices of animal exploitation varies with cultural ingroup-outgroup origin as well as with ideological and identity-based factors. Across the United States (Study 1), Norway, Spain, and Australia (Study…

Animal and Plant Science Education (4 works) · Dominance (genetics (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Social dominance orientation (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Developmental psychology (2 works) · Human-Animal Interaction Studies (2 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 works) · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae