Judith M Dallinger
Biographic Data
| ID | 207989 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Judith M Dallinger |
| GIVEN NAMES | Judith M |
| FAMILY NAME | Dallinger |
| SIGNATURE | DALLINGER J M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Western Illinois University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 22 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1987 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1991 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The Developmental Nature of Self-Disclosure
This study investigated the nature of self-disclosure in developing relationships. After completing various tasks on three separate occasions, 88 students completed a measure of self-disclosure. Analysis indicated that amount of disclosure increased consistently, while depth of disclosure consistently decreased across time. The dimensions of honesty and intent of disclosure fluctuated across time, while positiveness of disclosure did not change. …
Individual Differences in Cognitive Editing Standards
This study is aimed at understanding how people edit their own arguments prior to uttering them (Hample, 1984; Hample & Dallinger, 1985a, 1985b). The main categories of editorial criteria are effectiveness, principled objection to type of argument, person-centered issues, and discourse competence standards. Our main purpose here is to begin an account of what sort of person prefers which criteria. Argumentativeness (Infante & Rancer, 1982), verba…
Individual Differences in Cognitive Editing Standards
This study is aimed at understanding how people edit their own arguments prior to uttering them (Hample, 1984; Hample & Dallinger, 1985a, 1985b). The main categories of editorial criteria are effectiveness, principled objection to type of argument, person-centered issues, and discourse competence standards. Our main purpose here is to begin an account of what sort of person prefers which criteria. Argumentativeness (Infante & Rancer, 1982), verba…
Individual Differences in Cognitive Editing Standards
This study is aimed at understanding how people edit their own arguments prior to uttering them (Hample, 1984; Hample & Dallinger, 1985a, 1985b). The main categories of editorial criteria are effectiveness, principled objection to type of argument, person-centered issues, and discourse competence standards. Our main purpose here is to begin an account of what sort of person prefers which criteria. Argumentativeness (Infante & Rancer, 1982), verba…
The Developmental Nature of Self-Disclosure
This study investigated the nature of self-disclosure in developing relationships. After completing various tasks on three separate occasions, 88 students completed a measure of self-disclosure. Analysis indicated that amount of disclosure increased consistently, while depth of disclosure consistently decreased across time. The dimensions of honesty and intent of disclosure fluctuated across time, while positiveness of disclosure did not change. …
Developmental psychology (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Applied Psychology (1 work) · Applied Psychology (1 work) · Argument (complex analysis (1 work) · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 work) · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 work) · Clinical Psychology (1 work)