Joe S Cecil
Biographic Data
| ID | 210404 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Joe S Cecil |
| GIVEN NAMES | Joe S |
| FAMILY NAME | Cecil |
| SIGNATURE | CECIL J S |
| AFFILIATIONS | American Journal Experts (United States) |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 16 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 7 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1981 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Scientists as Experts Serving the Court
Our courts were not designed to consider the increasingly complex scientific and technical evidence needed to resolve contemporary legal disputes. Moreover, when conflicting evidence requires an understanding and interpretation of scientific or technical issues, allowing the parties to control the presentation of evidence places great strain on the judge and jury. This essay describes and evaluates three prototypical procedures that allow courts …
Ten Years of Judicial Gatekeeping Under Daubert
In the ten years since Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc, the standards for admissibility at trial of expert testimony in general and scientific evidence in particular have become more demanding. Reviews of recent cases and empirical studies of federal judges’ and attorneys’ practices indicate that judges are more likely to consider the admissibility of expert evidence prior to trial, to inquire more deeply into the reasoning and methodo…
Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials
Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials
The results of 3 surveys (1 each of federal judges in 1991 and 1998 and another of attorneys in 1999) indicate that practices and beliefs concerning expert testimony have changed in the wake of the 1993 Supreme Court decision on admissibility in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Reporting both on their general experience with expert testimony and on their most recent civil trial involving such testimony, judges and attorneys indicated …
Solutions to Ethical and Legal Problems in Social Research
Solutions to Ethical and Legal Problems in Social Research
Assuring the Confidentiality of Social Research Data
Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials
The results of 3 surveys (1 each of federal judges in 1991 and 1998 and another of attorneys in 1999) indicate that practices and beliefs concerning expert testimony have changed in the wake of the 1993 Supreme Court decision on admissibility in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Reporting both on their general experience with expert testimony and on their most recent civil trial involving such testimony, judges and attorneys indicated …
Ten Years of Judicial Gatekeeping Under Daubert
In the ten years since Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc, the standards for admissibility at trial of expert testimony in general and scientific evidence in particular have become more demanding. Reviews of recent cases and empirical studies of federal judges’ and attorneys’ practices indicate that judges are more likely to consider the admissibility of expert evidence prior to trial, to inquire more deeply into the reasoning and methodo…
Scientists as Experts Serving the Court
Our courts were not designed to consider the increasingly complex scientific and technical evidence needed to resolve contemporary legal disputes. Moreover, when conflicting evidence requires an understanding and interpretation of scientific or technical issues, allowing the parties to control the presentation of evidence places great strain on the judge and jury. This essay describes and evaluates three prototypical procedures that allow courts …
Assuring the Confidentiality of Social Research Data
Solutions to Ethical and Legal Problems in Social Research
Solutions to Ethical and Legal Problems in Social Research
Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials
Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials
The results of 3 surveys (1 each of federal judges in 1991 and 1998 and another of attorneys in 1999) indicate that practices and beliefs concerning expert testimony have changed in the wake of the 1993 Supreme Court decision on admissibility in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Reporting both on their general experience with expert testimony and on their most recent civil trial involving such testimony, judges and attorneys indicated …
Ten Years of Judicial Gatekeeping Under Daubert
In the ten years since Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc, the standards for admissibility at trial of expert testimony in general and scientific evidence in particular have become more demanding. Reviews of recent cases and empirical studies of federal judges’ and attorneys’ practices indicate that judges are more likely to consider the admissibility of expert evidence prior to trial, to inquire more deeply into the reasoning and methodo…
Scientists as Experts Serving the Court
Our courts were not designed to consider the increasingly complex scientific and technical evidence needed to resolve contemporary legal disputes. Moreover, when conflicting evidence requires an understanding and interpretation of scientific or technical issues, allowing the parties to control the presentation of evidence places great strain on the judge and jury. This essay describes and evaluates three prototypical procedures that allow courts …
Political science (6 works) · Legal Education and Practice Innovations (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Engineering (3 works) · Engineering ethics (3 works) · Jury Decision Making Processes (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (3 works) · Civil procedure (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works)