Kristin L Carman

Dados Biográficos

ID2197240
NOMEKristin L Carman
PRENOMESKristin L
SOBRENOMECarman
ASSINATURACARMAN K L
AFILIAÇÕESPatient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute Washington DC USA
VERIFICADONão
TOTAL DE OBRAS6
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES10
TOTAL COMO AUTOR6
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO1999
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2023
ÍNDICE H1

  • Examining how study teams manage different viewpoints and priorities in patient‐centered outcomes research

    Open AccessMaureen Maurer, Tandrea Hilliard‐Boone et al.ARTICLEHealth Expectations2023

    INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence exists about which patient and stakeholder engagement practices support or hinder study teams as they negotiate different viewpoints in decisions about the design and conduct of patient-centered outcomes research. METHODS: We applied a multiple-embedded descriptive case study design for six studies funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). We interviewed 32 researchers and stakeholder partn…

  • What motivates patients and caregivers to engage in health research and how engagement affects their lives

    Open AccessRachel Hemphill, Laura P Forsythe et al.ARTICLEHealth Expectations2020

    BACKGROUND: US research organizations increasingly are supporting patient and stakeholder engagement in health research with a goal of producing more useful, relevant and patient-centered evidence better aligned with real-world clinical needs. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) engages patients, family caregivers and other health-care stakeholders, including clinicians, payers and policymakers, as active partners in prioriti…

  • Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare

    Open AccessKristin L Carman, Coretta Mallery et al.ARTICLESocial Science & Medicine2015Citada por: 10Referências: 30

    Chicago, IL; Sacramento, CA; Silver Spring, MD; and Durham, NC, capturing a sociodemographically diverse sample with specific attention to ensuring inclusion of Hispanic, African-American, and elderly participants. Of 1774 people recruited, 75% participated: 961 took part in a deliberative method and 377 participants comprised the RMO control group. To assess effectiveness of the deliberative methods overall and of individual methods, we evaluate…

  • Patient And Family Engagement

    Kristin L Carman, Pam Dardess et al.ARTICLEHealth Affairs2013

    Patient and family engagement offers a promising pathway toward better-quality health care, more-efficient care, and improved population health. Since definitions of patient engagement and conceptions of how it works vary, we propose a framework. We first present the forms engagement can take, ranging from consultation to partnership. We discuss the levels at which patient engagement can occur across the health care system, from the direct care s…

  • Engaging the Public in Decisions about Health Research—The Role of Public Deliberation

    Open AccessJoanna E Siegel, Jessica Heeringa et al.ARTICLEThe AMA Journal of Ethic2013

    As efforts to include patients in the design and execution of research studies continue to expand, public deliberation offers a means for the general public to become involved with the broader social context that determines the impact of research, from the identification of research priorities to the use of research results to shape health care policy and practice

  • Epilogue

    Kristin L Carman, Pamela Farley Short et al.ARTICLEMedical Care1999

    Objectives. The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPSTM) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPSTM in 1997. Formal evaluations of the experiences of three demonstration sites with implementing CAHPSTM (ie, process evaluations) and the impact of CAHPSTM on consumer's choices (i…