Nicolas Raineri
Biographic Data
| ID | 223030 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Nicolas Raineri |
| GIVEN NAMES | Nicolas |
| FAMILY NAME | Raineri |
| SIGNATURE | RAINERI N |
| AFFILIATIONS | UNESCO |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0336-4550 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Is It Fair to be Accurate? Moral-Emotional Responses to Organizations’ AI Orientation Choices
While research on algorithmic decision-making has grown substantially, little is known about people’s moral reactions to organizations’ artificial intelligence (AI) orientation choices. Drawing on deonance theory, we hypothesize that an organization’s choice between an algorithm maximizing accuracy at the expense of fairness and one prioritizing fairness over accuracy triggers distinct moral-emotional responses among third-party observers. We con…
A deontic perspective on organizational citizenship behavior toward the environment: The contribution of anticipated guilt
This study draws on deontic justice theory to examine an unexplored socioemotional micro‐foundation of corporate social responsibility (CSR), namely anticipated guilt, in an effort to improve our understanding of employees’ moral reactions to their organization’s CSR. We empirically investigate whether environmental CSR induces anticipated guilt (i.e., concerns about future guilt for not contributing to organizational CSR) leading to organization…
Linking Corporate Policy and Supervisory Support with Environmental Citizenship Behaviors: The Role of Employee Environmental Beliefs and Commitment
The PhD program: Between Conformity and Reflexivity
PurposeThis paper seeks to contribute to a better understanding of the impact on doctoral education attributable to performativity pressures in academia, by exploring the practices associated with the production of academic knowledge within the doctoral process.Design/methodology/approachAn (auto)ethnographic inquiry was conducted over a period of ten months within the business school of a major Canadian university in order to examine socialisati…
The PhD program: Between Conformity and Reflexivity
PurposeThis paper seeks to contribute to a better understanding of the impact on doctoral education attributable to performativity pressures in academia, by exploring the practices associated with the production of academic knowledge within the doctoral process.Design/methodology/approachAn (auto)ethnographic inquiry was conducted over a period of ten months within the business school of a major Canadian university in order to examine socialisati…
The PhD program: Between Conformity and Reflexivity
PurposeThis paper seeks to contribute to a better understanding of the impact on doctoral education attributable to performativity pressures in academia, by exploring the practices associated with the production of academic knowledge within the doctoral process.Design/methodology/approachAn (auto)ethnographic inquiry was conducted over a period of ten months within the business school of a major Canadian university in order to examine socialisati…
Linking Corporate Policy and Supervisory Support with Environmental Citizenship Behaviors: The Role of Employee Environmental Beliefs and Commitment
A deontic perspective on organizational citizenship behavior toward the environment: The contribution of anticipated guilt
This study draws on deontic justice theory to examine an unexplored socioemotional micro‐foundation of corporate social responsibility (CSR), namely anticipated guilt, in an effort to improve our understanding of employees’ moral reactions to their organization’s CSR. We empirically investigate whether environmental CSR induces anticipated guilt (i.e., concerns about future guilt for not contributing to organizational CSR) leading to organization…
Is It Fair to be Accurate? Moral-Emotional Responses to Organizations’ AI Orientation Choices
While research on algorithmic decision-making has grown substantially, little is known about people’s moral reactions to organizations’ artificial intelligence (AI) orientation choices. Drawing on deonance theory, we hypothesize that an organization’s choice between an algorithm maximizing accuracy at the expense of fairness and one prioritizing fairness over accuracy triggers distinct moral-emotional responses among third-party observers. We con…
Political science (3 works) · Business ethics (2 works) · Citizenship (2 works) · Context (archaeology) (2 works) · Corporate social responsibility (2 works) · Environmental Sustainability in Business (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Organizational citizenship behavior (2 works) · Organizational commitment (2 works) · Psychology (2 works)