Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Robert H Mclaughlin

Biographic Data

ID2278498
NAMERobert H Mclaughlin
GIVEN NAMESRobert H
FAMILY NAMEMclaughlin
SIGNATUREMCLAUGHLIN R H
AFFILIATIONSCancer Prevention Institute of California
ORCID0000-0002-4997-6333
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS18
AUTHOR COUNT10
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1982
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
H-INDEX3
  • Getting angry with honest people’: The illicit market for immigrant ‘papers’ in Cape Town, South Africa

    Open Access•Theresa Alfaro-Velcamp, Robert H Mclaughlin et al.•ARTICLE•Migration Studies•2017•Cited by: 2•References: 7

    South African Department of Home Affairs (DHA) officials ‘seem to get angry with honest people’, shared a Congolese immigrant from the Kivu region who now resides in Cape Town. Some DHA officials get money through illicit transactions for ‘papers’ and they become visibly frustrated with immigrants who try to obtain documents by lawful means. While there has been much focus on xenophobia associated with immigration in South Africa, there has been …

  • The Vulnerability of Immigrants in Research: Enhancing Protocol Development and Ethics Review

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin, Theresa Alfaro-Velcamp•ARTICLE•Journal of Academic Ethics•2015•Cited by: 9•References: 6

  • Immigration and Techniques of Governance in Mexico and the United States: Recalibrating National Narratives through Comparative Immigration Histories

    Open Access•Theresa Alfaro-Velcamp, Robert H Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Law and History Review•2011•References: 21

    Immigration histories typically endeavor to describe and hold a nation–state accountable not only for the laws and policies by which it admits some immigrants, but also for those by which it refuses, excludes, or deports other immigrants. This article explores immigration to Mexico and to the United States with attention to its implications for the status of persons, and also for the conventional historical narratives in each country. The article…

  • Are cancer registries unconstitutional

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin, Christina A Clarke et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2010•References: 11

  • From the Field to the Courthouse: Should Social Science Research Be Privileged?

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•1999

    Social scientists need clarification about the extent to which the confidential aspects of their research are protected from compulsory disclosure in legal proceedings, and the extent to which they ought to be. Investigating the nature of social science research with an emphasis on researcher-participant relationships in ethnographic practice, I conclude that a qualified privilege would confer three major benefits on social science researchers: c…

  • Privilege and Practice in Social Science Research

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•1999

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Privilege and Practice in Social Science Research: [Rejoinder]

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•1999

    I am grateful to each of the scholars who wrote commentaries on From the Field to the Courthouse: Should Social Science Research Be Privileged? The research experiences they describe enrich and enhance the discussion of the appropriateness of a scholarly research privilege. The commentaries further emphasize several difficult issues both in particular research contexts and in general. In the following response, I reflect on two striking themes fr…

  • From the Field to the Courthouse: Should Social Science Research Be Privileged

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•1999•Cited by: 4•References: 5

    Social scientists need clarification about the extent to which the confidential aspects of their research are protected from compulsory disclosure in legal proceedings, and the extent to which they ought to be. Investigating the nature of social science research with an emphasis on researcher-participant relationships in ethnographic practice, I conclude that a qualified privilege would confer three major benefits on social science researchers: c…

  • What? Where? When? Why? Essays on Induction, Space and Time, Explanation

    Open Access•Gwynn Nettler, Robert H Mclaughlin et al.•ARTICLE•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1984

  • Invention and Induction Laudan, Simon and The Logic of Discovery

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin, Robert Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1982•Cited by: 3•References: 8

    Although on opposite sides of the logic of discovery debate, Laudan and Simon share a thesis of divorce between discovery (invention) and justification (appraisal); but unlike some other authors, they do not base their respective versions of the divorce-thesis on the empirical/logical distinction. Laudan argues that, in contemporary science, invention is irrelevant to appraisal, and that this irrelevance renders epistemically pointless the invent…

  • The Vulnerability of Immigrants in Research: Enhancing Protocol Development and Ethics Review

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin, Theresa Alfaro-Velcamp•ARTICLE•Journal of Academic Ethics•2015•Cited by: 9•References: 6

  • From the Field to the Courthouse: Should Social Science Research Be Privileged

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•1999•Cited by: 4•References: 5

    Social scientists need clarification about the extent to which the confidential aspects of their research are protected from compulsory disclosure in legal proceedings, and the extent to which they ought to be. Investigating the nature of social science research with an emphasis on researcher-participant relationships in ethnographic practice, I conclude that a qualified privilege would confer three major benefits on social science researchers: c…

  • Invention and Induction Laudan, Simon and The Logic of Discovery

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin, Robert Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1982•Cited by: 3•References: 8

    Although on opposite sides of the logic of discovery debate, Laudan and Simon share a thesis of divorce between discovery (invention) and justification (appraisal); but unlike some other authors, they do not base their respective versions of the divorce-thesis on the empirical/logical distinction. Laudan argues that, in contemporary science, invention is irrelevant to appraisal, and that this irrelevance renders epistemically pointless the invent…

  • Getting angry with honest people’: The illicit market for immigrant ‘papers’ in Cape Town, South Africa

    Open Access•Theresa Alfaro-Velcamp, Robert H Mclaughlin et al.•ARTICLE•Migration Studies•2017•Cited by: 2•References: 7

    South African Department of Home Affairs (DHA) officials ‘seem to get angry with honest people’, shared a Congolese immigrant from the Kivu region who now resides in Cape Town. Some DHA officials get money through illicit transactions for ‘papers’ and they become visibly frustrated with immigrants who try to obtain documents by lawful means. While there has been much focus on xenophobia associated with immigration in South Africa, there has been …

  • Invention and Induction Laudan, Simon and The Logic of Discovery

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin, Robert Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1982•Cited by: 3•References: 8

    Although on opposite sides of the logic of discovery debate, Laudan and Simon share a thesis of divorce between discovery (invention) and justification (appraisal); but unlike some other authors, they do not base their respective versions of the divorce-thesis on the empirical/logical distinction. Laudan argues that, in contemporary science, invention is irrelevant to appraisal, and that this irrelevance renders epistemically pointless the invent…

  • What? Where? When? Why? Essays on Induction, Space and Time, Explanation

    Open Access•Gwynn Nettler, Robert H Mclaughlin et al.•ARTICLE•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1984

  • From the Field to the Courthouse: Should Social Science Research Be Privileged?

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•1999

    Social scientists need clarification about the extent to which the confidential aspects of their research are protected from compulsory disclosure in legal proceedings, and the extent to which they ought to be. Investigating the nature of social science research with an emphasis on researcher-participant relationships in ethnographic practice, I conclude that a qualified privilege would confer three major benefits on social science researchers: c…

  • Privilege and Practice in Social Science Research

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•1999

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Privilege and Practice in Social Science Research: [Rejoinder]

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•1999

    I am grateful to each of the scholars who wrote commentaries on From the Field to the Courthouse: Should Social Science Research Be Privileged? The research experiences they describe enrich and enhance the discussion of the appropriateness of a scholarly research privilege. The commentaries further emphasize several difficult issues both in particular research contexts and in general. In the following response, I reflect on two striking themes fr…

  • From the Field to the Courthouse: Should Social Science Research Be Privileged

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•1999•Cited by: 4•References: 5

    Social scientists need clarification about the extent to which the confidential aspects of their research are protected from compulsory disclosure in legal proceedings, and the extent to which they ought to be. Investigating the nature of social science research with an emphasis on researcher-participant relationships in ethnographic practice, I conclude that a qualified privilege would confer three major benefits on social science researchers: c…

  • Are cancer registries unconstitutional

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin, Christina A Clarke et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2010•References: 11

  • Immigration and Techniques of Governance in Mexico and the United States: Recalibrating National Narratives through Comparative Immigration Histories

    Open Access•Theresa Alfaro-Velcamp, Robert H Mclaughlin•ARTICLE•Law and History Review•2011•References: 21

    Immigration histories typically endeavor to describe and hold a nation–state accountable not only for the laws and policies by which it admits some immigrants, but also for those by which it refuses, excludes, or deports other immigrants. This article explores immigration to Mexico and to the United States with attention to its implications for the status of persons, and also for the conventional historical narratives in each country. The article…

  • The Vulnerability of Immigrants in Research: Enhancing Protocol Development and Ethics Review

    Open Access•Robert H Mclaughlin, Theresa Alfaro-Velcamp•ARTICLE•Journal of Academic Ethics•2015•Cited by: 9•References: 6

  • Getting angry with honest people’: The illicit market for immigrant ‘papers’ in Cape Town, South Africa

    Open Access•Theresa Alfaro-Velcamp, Robert H Mclaughlin et al.•ARTICLE•Migration Studies•2017•Cited by: 2•References: 7

    South African Department of Home Affairs (DHA) officials ‘seem to get angry with honest people’, shared a Congolese immigrant from the Kivu region who now resides in Cape Town. Some DHA officials get money through illicit transactions for ‘papers’ and they become visibly frustrated with immigrants who try to obtain documents by lawful means. While there has been much focus on xenophobia associated with immigration in South Africa, there has been …

Political science (8 works) · Sociology (8 works) · Law (7 works) · Law (7 works) · Ethics in Clinical Research (3 works) · Government (linguistics (3 works) · Immigration (3 works) · Legal Education and Practice Innovations (3 works) · Privilege (computing (3 works) · Public relations (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae