Li-Lin Rao

Biographic Data

ID228382
NAMELi-Lin Rao
GIVEN NAMESLi-Lin
FAMILY NAMERao
SIGNATURERAO L
AFFILIATIONSInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
ORCID0000-0002-4542-9981
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS20
TOTAL CITATIONS7
AUTHOR COUNT20
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2009
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2

  • Effects of childhood environments on the discernment of health misinformation

    Open AccessSiqi Zhang, Si-Qi Zhang et al.ARTICLESocial Science & Medicine2025References: 81

  • An Agenda-Setting Account for Psychological Typhoon Eye Effect on Responses to the Outbreak of Covid-19 in Wuhan

    Open AccessShuwen Yang, Shu-Wen YANG et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal of…2023

    During the outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan in 2020, we conducted a nationwide survey of 8170 respondents from 31 provinces/municipalities in China via Sojump to examine the relationship between the distance to respondents' city of residence from Wuhan and their safety concerns and risk perception of the epidemic that occurred in Wuhan City. We found that (1) the farther (psychologically or physically) people were from Wuhan, the more concerned they…

  • Emotion, analytic thinking and susceptibility to misinformation during the Covid-19 outbreak

    Open AccessMinghui Li, Ming-Hui Li et al.ARTICLEComputers in Human Behavior2022

  • When expectation-maximization-based theories work or do not work: An eye-tracking study of the discrepancy between everyone and every one

    Hong-Zhi Liu, Xingshan Li et al.ARTICLEActa Psychologica Sinica2022

    摘要: 主流的风险决策理论专家发展了一系列基于期望值最大化(expectation-maximization)的理论, 以期捕获所有人的风险决策行为。然而大量证据表明, 这些基于期望值最大化的理论并不能如同描述性理论那样理想地描述单一个体的决策行为。本研究采用眼动追踪技术, 系统考察了个体在为所有人决策与为自己决策时的风险决策行为及信息加工过程的差异。本研究发现, 基于期望值最大化的理论可捕获为所有人决策或为自己多次决策时的情况, 却不能很好捕获个体为自己进行单次决策时的情况。本研究结果有助于理解基于期望值最大化的理论与启发式/非基于期望值最大化的理论的边界, 为风险决策理论的划分和发展提供实证参考

  • Impaired Outcome Evaluation During Risky Decision-Making in Individuals with Methamphetamine Use Disorder

    Open AccessXiaoyang Sui, Xiao-Yang Sui et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal of Mental…2022

  • The timing of gaze-contingent decision prompts influences risky choice

    Open AccessXiaoyang Sui, Hong‐zhi Liu et al.ARTICLECognition2020

  • Worth-based choice: Giving an offered smaller pear an even greater fictional value

    Open AccessYu Zheng, Si‐Chu Shen et al.ARTICLEJournal of Pacific Rim Psychology2019

    Choices between options represented in a multidimensional space, in which each dimension signifies a distinct attribute describing the objects, are presumably guided by the principle of value maximization. However, the current study assumes that in a real-world setting, those who are able to imagine things that do not actually exist could modify the multidimensional space by self-generating an unoffered but fictional dimension. We define the util…

  • Out of debt, out of burden: The physical burdens of debt

    Open AccessHongzhi Liu, Hong-Zhi Liu et al.ARTICLEJournal of Experimental Social…2018Cited by: 2References: 37

  • Suffering a Loss Is Good Fortune: Myth or Reality

    Open AccessCui‐Xia Zhao, Si‐Chu Shen et al.ARTICLEJournal of Behavioral Decision…2017Cited by: 1References: 18

    We sometimes decide to take an offered option that results in apparent loss (e.g., unpaid overtime). Mainstream decision theory does not predict or explain this as a choice we want to make, whereas such a choice has long been described and highly regarded by the traditional Chinese dogma "" (suffering a loss is good fortune). To explore what makes the dogma work, we developed a celebrity anecdote-based scale to measure "Chikui" (suffering a loss)…

  • Not all gamblers are created equal: Gambling preferences depend on individual personality traits

    Hongzhi Liu, Hong-Zhi Liu et al.ARTICLEJournal of Risk Research2016References: 4

    Previous studies have presented evidence revealing that the dispositional personalities of consumers, or the traits associated with their gambling behaviors and risk preferences, differ across various gambling types. Those studies leave open the question of whether and how personality differences affect domain-specific gambling preferences. Using latent class analysis (LCA), we explored the latent classes of risk preference for different gambling…

  • A Scanpath Analysis of the Risky Decision‐Making Process

    Open AccessLei Zhou, Yang‐Yang Zhang et al.ARTICLEJournal of Behavioral Decision…2016Cited by: 2References: 3

    In the field of eye tracking, scanpath analysis can reflect the sequential and temporal properties of the cognitive process. However, the advantages of scanpath analysis have not yet been utilized in the study of risky decision making. We explored the methodological applicability of scanpath analysis to test models of risky decision making by analyzing published data from the eye‐tracking studies of Su et al. (2013); Wang and Li (2012), and Sun, …

  • Discounting or Priority: Which Rule Dominates the Intertemporal Choice Process

    Hong-Zhi Liu, Cheng‐Ming Jiang et al.ARTICLEActa Psychologica Sinica2015

    摘要

  • Effect of perceived risk on nuclear power plant operators’ safety behavior and errors

    Li-Lin Rao, Yaoshan Xu et al.ARTICLEJournal of Risk Research2015

    Safety behavior and human errors are major concerns for nuclear power plant operators. The present study investigated how nuclear power plant operators’ perceived risk influences the quality of their own work performance in terms of safety behavior and errors. In total, 349 operators from two nuclear power plants in China participated in the present study. We found that perceived risk had a negative linear relationship with safety behavior and a …

  • Positive and Negative Affect in Loss Aversion: Additive or Subtractive Logic

    Open AccessHui Tang, Zhe Liang et al.ARTICLEJournal of Behavioral Decision…2015Cited by: 1References: 9

    Previous studies explain loss aversion as the result of a situation in which the expected negative emotions derived from a potential loss exceed the expected positive emotions derived from a potential gain (subtractive logic). We questioned this view and proposed additive logic, in which a linear combination between negative and positive emotions can be used as summed anticipatory affect intensity (SAAI) to explain loss aversion. By disproving tw…

  • Formulating an emergency plan based on expectation-maximization is one thing, but applying it to a single case is another

    Hong-Yue Sun, Hongyue Sun et al.ARTICLEJournal of Risk Research2013References: 7

    This research extends the exploration of single-play/multiple-play distinctions from monetary gambling paradigm to emergency management situation. We conducted three studies (two survey studies and one eye tracking study) to test whether an emergency plan we formulated in advance based on expectation-maximization would be likely to be applied in a single case. In the first two survey studies we found that the plan with the higher EV was more like…

  • From quality to quantity: The role of common features in consumer preference

    Open AccessYin Su, Li-Lin Rao et al.ARTICLEJournal of Economic Psychology2012References: 44

  • Disadvantage and prosocial behavior: The effects of the Wenchuan earthquake

    Open AccessLi-Lin Rao, Ru Han et al.ARTICLEEvolution and Human Behavior2011

  • Every Science/Nature Potter Praises His Own Pot-Can We Believe What He Says Based on His Mother Tongue

    Open AccessHu Li, Shu Li Shu Li et al.ARTICLEJournal of Cross-Cultural…2011Cited by: 1References: 18

    It has been consistently observed that people are generally overconfident in their judgments or decisions and that overconfidence in general knowledge is typically stronger among Asian than among Western subject groups. However, scientists, whose job is to produce neutral and objective knowledge, are expected to be immune to overconfidence and to be independent of cross-cultural variation. The authors conducted an email survey to determine whethe…

  • Anticipated Regret, Risk Perception, or Both: Which is Most Likely Responsible for Our Intention to Gamble

    Open AccessShu Li, Li Shu et al.ARTICLEJournal of Gambling Studies2010

  • The Experiencing of Imposed Rule: A New Attempt to Test Both Normative and Descriptive Decision Theories

    Li-Lin Rao, Zhu‐Yuan Liang et al.ARTICLEActa Psychologica Sinica2009

    摘要: 为寻求检验规范性和描述性风险决策理论的通用标准, 本研究以期望价值理论和齐当别抉择模型为例, 探讨了“迫选规则体验法”的适用性。被试为120名大学生, 实验任务为要求被试分别完成自主决策(采用未知规则: 真规则)和规则迫选决策(遵循给定规则: 假规则)任务, 并对决策后的情感和认可程度进行评定。研究发现: (1) 被试在自主决策条件下比在规则迫选条件下体验到的正性情感程度更强, 负性情感的程度更弱; (2) 被试在自主决策与规则迫选决策两种条件下做出的相同决策越多, 该被试对迫选规则更加认可并体验到的正性情感程度越强, 负性情感的程度越弱; (3) 与期望价值理论相比, 齐当别抉择模型可能符合更多决策者的实际决策规则。这些结果表明, 作为检验规范性和描述性风险决策理论的新尝试, 迫选规则体验法可能更有助于回答“决策者实际采用的决策规则是什么”的问题