Victoria Charlton
Biographic Data
| ID | 231095 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Victoria Charlton |
| GIVEN NAMES | Victoria |
| FAMILY NAME | Charlton |
| SIGNATURE | CHARLTON V |
| AFFILIATIONS | King's College London |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7407-2627 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The ethical canary: Narrow reflective equilibrium as a source of moral justification in healthcare priority-setting
Healthcare priority-setting institutions have good reason to want to demonstrate that their decisions are morally justified—and those who contribute to and use the health service have good reason to hope for the same. However, finding a moral basis on which to evaluate healthcare priority-setting is difficult. Substantive approaches are vulnerable to reasonable disagreement about the appropriate grounds for allocating resources, while procedural …
Does Nice apply the rule of rescue in its approach to highly specialised technologies
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the UK’s main healthcare priority-setting body, recently reaffirmed a longstanding claim that in recommending technologies to the National Health Service it cannot apply the ‘rule of rescue’. This paper explores this claim by identifying key characteristics of the rule and establishing to what extent these are also features of NICE’s approach to evaluating ultra-orphan drugs through it…
Innovation as a value in healthcare priority-setting: The UK experience
All healthcare systems operate with limited resources and therefore need to set priorities for allocating resources across a population. Trade-offs between maximising health and promoting health equity are inevitable in this process. In this paper, we use the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) as an example to examine how efforts to promote healthcare innovation in the priority-setting process can complicate these trade…
Innovation as a value in healthcare priority-setting: The UK experience
All healthcare systems operate with limited resources and therefore need to set priorities for allocating resources across a population. Trade-offs between maximising health and promoting health equity are inevitable in this process. In this paper, we use the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) as an example to examine how efforts to promote healthcare innovation in the priority-setting process can complicate these trade…
Innovation as a value in healthcare priority-setting: The UK experience
All healthcare systems operate with limited resources and therefore need to set priorities for allocating resources across a population. Trade-offs between maximising health and promoting health equity are inevitable in this process. In this paper, we use the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) as an example to examine how efforts to promote healthcare innovation in the priority-setting process can complicate these trade…
Does Nice apply the rule of rescue in its approach to highly specialised technologies
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the UK’s main healthcare priority-setting body, recently reaffirmed a longstanding claim that in recommending technologies to the National Health Service it cannot apply the ‘rule of rescue’. This paper explores this claim by identifying key characteristics of the rule and establishing to what extent these are also features of NICE’s approach to evaluating ultra-orphan drugs through it…
The ethical canary: Narrow reflective equilibrium as a source of moral justification in healthcare priority-setting
Healthcare priority-setting institutions have good reason to want to demonstrate that their decisions are morally justified—and those who contribute to and use the health service have good reason to hope for the same. However, finding a moral basis on which to evaluate healthcare priority-setting is difficult. Substantive approaches are vulnerable to reasonable disagreement about the appropriate grounds for allocating resources, while procedural …
Computer Science (3 works) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 works) · Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 works) · Data science (2 works) · Health care (2 works) · Healthcare Policy and Management (2 works) · Business (1 works) · Economic growth (1 works) · Economics (1 works) · Engineering (1 works)