Carol Genetti

Datos Biográficos

ID235127
NOMBRECarol Genetti
NOMBRESCarol
APELLIDOGenetti
FIRMAGENETTI C
AFILIACIONESUniversity of California, Santa Barbara
ORCID0000-0001-5459-8317
VERIFICADOSí
TOTAL DE OBRAS10
TOTAL DE CITAS0
TOTAL COMO AUTOR10
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN1986
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2024
ÍNDICE H0

  • Twenty years of Himalayan Linguistics

    Open AccessLauren Gawne, Gregory Anderson et al.ARTICLEHimalayan Linguistics2024

    This issue of Himalayan Linguistics marks twenty years for the journal. We reflect on the early history of Himalayan Linguistics, its contribution to the field, and the future of the journal

  • Barbara (“Barb”) Frances Kelly

    Open AccessPatricia Clancy, Eve Clark et al.ARTICLEHimalayan Linguistics2023

    This memoriam honors Barbara Frances Kelly, our friend and colleague, who passed away on 14 December, 2022

  • Direction and associated motion in Tibeto-Burman

    Open AccessCarol Genetti, Kristine A Hildebrandt et al.ARTICLELinguistic Typology2021

    This study analyzes systems of direction and associated motion in 23 languages of the Tibeto-Burman family. Both direction and associated motion can be encoded by a range of grammatical strategies, including affixes, clitics, particles, serial-verb constructions, and auxiliary verbs. While some languages have only associated motion or direction, others have both, either via distinct subsystems, syntactic ambiguity, or context-dependent interpreta…

  • A note on the history of adjectival verbs in Newar

    Open AccessCarol GenettiARTICLEBulletin of the School of…2008

    Most of the adjectival verbs in the Kathmandu and Dolakha dialects of Newar exhibit idiosyncratic phonotactic shapes, including rare disyllabic stems and heavy and nasalized rhymes. The same set of adjectival verbs exhibits irregular inflectional patterns in the derivation of lexical adjectives in Kathmandu Newar. Comparison of the modern forms of both varieties and Classical Newar suggests that we reconstruct a class of monosyllabic adjectives f…

  • The participial construction of Dolakhā Newar

    Carol GenettiARTICLEStudies in Language2005

    The terms “(clause) chaining” and “converbal constructions” are used for the classification of similar types of clause linkage. Chaining is generally used for constructions which do not entail subordination, while converbs are defined as subordinate. In Dolakhā Newar adverbial and “participial” clauses are not syntactically distinct, but neither are they subordinate. I propose that the term “converb” be redefined as a clause-linkage strategy that…

  • Object Relations and Dative Case in Dolakha Newari

    Carol GenettiARTICLEStudies in Language1997

    In Dolakha Newari, the dative case marks recipients of ditransitive verbs and some patients of monotransitive verbs. Quantative studies show that animacy and activation cost are both relevant in determining the distribution of dative case. Two theories on the syntactic status of objects in systems of this general type are shown to be inadequate for Dolakha. Instead it is found that there is no morphological or syntactic evidence for differentiati…

  • Semantic and Grammatical Categories of Relative Clause Morphology in the Languages of Nepal

    Carol GenettiARTICLEStudies in Language1992

    Preview this article: Semantic and Grammatical Categories of Relative Clause Morphology in the Languages of Nepal, Page 1 of 1 /docserver/preview/fulltext/sl.16.2.07gen-1.gif

  • Typology and Universals

    Open AccessCarol GenettiARTICLEJournal of Linguistic Anthropology1992

    Typology and Universals. William Croft. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 311 pp. $16.95 (paper), $49.50 (cloth

  • Segmental alternations in the Sunwari verb stem

    Open AccessCarol GenettiARTICLELinguistics1992

  • The Development of Subordinators from Postpositions In Bodic Languages

    Open AccessCarol GenettiARTICLEProceedings of the Annual Meeting…1986

    Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1986), pp. 387-400