Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Steven Hendley

Biographic Data

ID2392724
NAMESteven Hendley
GIVEN NAMESSteven
FAMILY NAMEHendley
SIGNATUREHENDLEY S
AFFILIATIONSBirmingham–Southern College
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT7
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1993
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2010
H-INDEX0
  • Answerable to the World: Experience and Practical Intentionality in Brandom's and McDowell's “Intramural” Debate

    Open Access•Steven Hendley•ARTICLE•Theoria•2010

    Robert Brandom and John McDowell pursue similar, yet strikingly different approaches to a shared problem: that of how we can be answerable to the world in our beliefs about it in the wake of Sellars' critique of the myth of the given. While McDowell attempts to rehabilitate the idea that experience is capable of providing justifications for our beliefs, Brandom constructs a sophisticated social‐pragmatist account of the objectivity of our concept…

  • Reassuring Ourselves of the Reality of Ethical Reasons: What McDowell Should Take from Foot’s Ethical Naturalism

    Open Access•Steven Hendley•ARTICLE•Dialogue•2009

    In this paper I argue that John McDowell’s objections to Philipa Foot’s ethical naturalism do not justify a rejection of her views, but only clarifies what we can defensibly take from her position. Moreover, his comments suggest a way in which Foot’s naturalism may help to secure the realism McDowell defends in his own work. In seeing how Foot’s naturalism can reassure us of the reality of ethical reasons, we can understand how McDowell needs som…

  • Speech and sensibility: Levinas and Habermas on the constitution of the moral point of view

    Open Access•Steven Hendley•ARTICLE•Man and World•2004

  • Autonomy and Alterity: Moral Obligation in Sartre and Levinas

    Steven Hendley•ARTICLE•Journal of the British Society…•1996•References: 1

    Bien qu'il soit d'accord avec Levinas pour montrer que l'affirmation sartrienne de l'autonomie ne peut fournir le fondement suffisant de nos obligations morales envers autrui, l'A. soutient qu'il est possible de penser ensemble la conception de l'autonomie chez Sartre et la conception de l'alterite chez Levinas, dans le cadre politique d'une communaute juste fondee sur le respect de l'alterite d'autrui comme condition de possibilite de l'autonomi…

  • Putting ourselves up for question: A postmodern critique of Richard Rorty's postmodernist bourgeois liberalism

    Open Access•Steven Hendley•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•1995

  • Truth and Existence

    Steven Hendley, Radical Philosophy Association•ARTICLE•Radical Philosophy Review of Books•1993

  • Liberalism, Communitarianism and the Conflictual Grounds of Democratic Pluralism

    Open Access•Steven Hendley•ARTICLE•Philosophy & Social Criticism•1993

No prominent works on this page.

  • Truth and Existence

    Steven Hendley, Radical Philosophy Association•ARTICLE•Radical Philosophy Review of Books•1993

  • Liberalism, Communitarianism and the Conflictual Grounds of Democratic Pluralism

    Open Access•Steven Hendley•ARTICLE•Philosophy & Social Criticism•1993

  • Putting ourselves up for question: A postmodern critique of Richard Rorty's postmodernist bourgeois liberalism

    Open Access•Steven Hendley•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•1995

  • Autonomy and Alterity: Moral Obligation in Sartre and Levinas

    Steven Hendley•ARTICLE•Journal of the British Society…•1996•References: 1

    Bien qu'il soit d'accord avec Levinas pour montrer que l'affirmation sartrienne de l'autonomie ne peut fournir le fondement suffisant de nos obligations morales envers autrui, l'A. soutient qu'il est possible de penser ensemble la conception de l'autonomie chez Sartre et la conception de l'alterite chez Levinas, dans le cadre politique d'une communaute juste fondee sur le respect de l'alterite d'autrui comme condition de possibilite de l'autonomi…

  • Speech and sensibility: Levinas and Habermas on the constitution of the moral point of view

    Open Access•Steven Hendley•ARTICLE•Man and World•2004

  • Reassuring Ourselves of the Reality of Ethical Reasons: What McDowell Should Take from Foot’s Ethical Naturalism

    Open Access•Steven Hendley•ARTICLE•Dialogue•2009

    In this paper I argue that John McDowell’s objections to Philipa Foot’s ethical naturalism do not justify a rejection of her views, but only clarifies what we can defensibly take from her position. Moreover, his comments suggest a way in which Foot’s naturalism may help to secure the realism McDowell defends in his own work. In seeing how Foot’s naturalism can reassure us of the reality of ethical reasons, we can understand how McDowell needs som…

  • Answerable to the World: Experience and Practical Intentionality in Brandom's and McDowell's “Intramural” Debate

    Open Access•Steven Hendley•ARTICLE•Theoria•2010

    Robert Brandom and John McDowell pursue similar, yet strikingly different approaches to a shared problem: that of how we can be answerable to the world in our beliefs about it in the wake of Sellars' critique of the myth of the given. While McDowell attempts to rehabilitate the idea that experience is capable of providing justifications for our beliefs, Brandom constructs a sophisticated social‐pragmatist account of the objectivity of our concept…

Epistemology (7 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (3 works) · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Liberalism (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae