Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ken R Daniels

Biographic Data

ID250514
NAMEKen R Daniels
GIVEN NAMESKen R
FAMILY NAMEDaniels
SIGNATUREDANIELS K R
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS12
TOTAL CITATIONS105
WORKS AS AUTHOR12
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1988
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
H-INDEX6
  • Embryo Donation or Embryo Adoption? Practice and Policy in the New Zealand Context

    Sonja Goedeke, Ken Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Law…•2017•References: 5

    Embryo donation (ED) is the donation by a couple who have surplus embryos following IVF to another infertile person/s. There has been much debate as to whether ED can be understood as akin to gamete donation or as adoption, as these viewpoints evoke different health and welfare concerns and implications for the various parties. In this article, we discuss the legislative frameworks, policy guidelines, and practice of ED in New Zealand in comparis…

  • The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family

    Open Access•Victoria M Grace, Ken Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2008•Cited by: 20•References: 13

  • The (ir)relevance of genetics

    Open Access•Victoria M Grace, Ken Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Sociology of Health & Illness•2007•Cited by: 9•References: 16

    Informing offspring of the nature of their conception when conceived via donated gametes such as donor sperm, is increasingly considered by professionals and policy makers to be desirable for many reasons. The aim of this research is to explore and understand processes within families that either facilitate or hinder the telling of children about their conception. This exploration includes analysing the complexity of sociocultural processes surro…

  • The Best Interests of the Child in Assisted Human Reproduction

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•2000•Cited by: 3•References: 5

    Developments in assisted human reproduction (AHR) have aroused considerable debate and interest around the world, with most governments accepting that they are matters of public policy. This politicization of AHR is explored in the context of a consideration of the oft-used term "the best interests of the child." This "rallying call" is frequently cited as the primary concern in the determination of policy. This article is based on the contention…

  • Information sharing in semen donation

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•1997•Cited by: 4•References: 12

  • Families formed as a result of donor insemination

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Child & Family Social Work•1996•References: 3

    This paper reports the views and feelings of semen donors at two London donor insemination (Dl) programmes regarding the recipients of Dl and the families created by this method. In particular it reports on: the types of recipients that donors wish to assist; their understanding of the legal position of donors and Di fathers; their views on the‘matching’ of donors and Dl fathers; their perception of Dl offspring's need or desire for information a…

  • Donor insemination

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•1996•Cited by: 14•References: 36

  • Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•1995•Cited by: 12•References: 14

  • Secrecy and Openness in Donor Insemination

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•1993•Cited by: 33•References: 4

    This article explores the issues surrounding the notions of secrecy and openness in donor insemination (DI). Secrecy in DI is first placed in historical context, with an outline of some of the main reasons that secrecy has been advocated. The concept of openness is then introduced, and some of the arguments for a more open approach to DI are presented. On this basis, the responses of various governments to calls for more openness are outlined, an…

  • Moving Towards Openness in Donor Insemination

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•1993•Cited by: 1•References: 1

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Relationships between Semen Donors and their Networks

    Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels•ARTICLE•Australian Social Work•1991•Cited by: 1•References: 2

    The semen donor can be seen as an individual who is at the centre of a web of relationships. Some of these relationships are interactive and therefore provide him with feedback. These include the clinic staff, his partner and friends. A further set of relationships are involved and these include the child, the recipient couple and the community. These relationships are non-reactive in that there is none or very little feedback for the donor

  • Artificial insemination using donor semen and the issue of secrecy

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•1988•Cited by: 8•References: 4

  • Secrecy and Openness in Donor Insemination

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•1993•Cited by: 33•References: 4

    This article explores the issues surrounding the notions of secrecy and openness in donor insemination (DI). Secrecy in DI is first placed in historical context, with an outline of some of the main reasons that secrecy has been advocated. The concept of openness is then introduced, and some of the arguments for a more open approach to DI are presented. On this basis, the responses of various governments to calls for more openness are outlined, an…

  • The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family

    Open Access•Victoria M Grace, Ken Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2008•Cited by: 20•References: 13

  • Donor insemination

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•1996•Cited by: 14•References: 36

  • Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•1995•Cited by: 12•References: 14

  • The (ir)relevance of genetics

    Open Access•Victoria M Grace, Ken Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Sociology of Health & Illness•2007•Cited by: 9•References: 16

    Informing offspring of the nature of their conception when conceived via donated gametes such as donor sperm, is increasingly considered by professionals and policy makers to be desirable for many reasons. The aim of this research is to explore and understand processes within families that either facilitate or hinder the telling of children about their conception. This exploration includes analysing the complexity of sociocultural processes surro…

  • Artificial insemination using donor semen and the issue of secrecy

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•1988•Cited by: 8•References: 4

  • Information sharing in semen donation

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•1997•Cited by: 4•References: 12

  • The Best Interests of the Child in Assisted Human Reproduction

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•2000•Cited by: 3•References: 5

    Developments in assisted human reproduction (AHR) have aroused considerable debate and interest around the world, with most governments accepting that they are matters of public policy. This politicization of AHR is explored in the context of a consideration of the oft-used term "the best interests of the child." This "rallying call" is frequently cited as the primary concern in the determination of policy. This article is based on the contention…

  • Moving Towards Openness in Donor Insemination

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•1993•Cited by: 1•References: 1

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Relationships between Semen Donors and their Networks

    Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels•ARTICLE•Australian Social Work•1991•Cited by: 1•References: 2

    The semen donor can be seen as an individual who is at the centre of a web of relationships. Some of these relationships are interactive and therefore provide him with feedback. These include the clinic staff, his partner and friends. A further set of relationships are involved and these include the child, the recipient couple and the community. These relationships are non-reactive in that there is none or very little feedback for the donor

  • Artificial insemination using donor semen and the issue of secrecy

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•1988•Cited by: 8•References: 4

  • Relationships between Semen Donors and their Networks

    Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels•ARTICLE•Australian Social Work•1991•Cited by: 1•References: 2

    The semen donor can be seen as an individual who is at the centre of a web of relationships. Some of these relationships are interactive and therefore provide him with feedback. These include the clinic staff, his partner and friends. A further set of relationships are involved and these include the child, the recipient couple and the community. These relationships are non-reactive in that there is none or very little feedback for the donor

  • Secrecy and Openness in Donor Insemination

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•1993•Cited by: 33•References: 4

    This article explores the issues surrounding the notions of secrecy and openness in donor insemination (DI). Secrecy in DI is first placed in historical context, with an outline of some of the main reasons that secrecy has been advocated. The concept of openness is then introduced, and some of the arguments for a more open approach to DI are presented. On this basis, the responses of various governments to calls for more openness are outlined, an…

  • Moving Towards Openness in Donor Insemination

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•1993•Cited by: 1•References: 1

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•1995•Cited by: 12•References: 14

  • Families formed as a result of donor insemination

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Child & Family Social Work•1996•References: 3

    This paper reports the views and feelings of semen donors at two London donor insemination (Dl) programmes regarding the recipients of Dl and the families created by this method. In particular it reports on: the types of recipients that donors wish to assist; their understanding of the legal position of donors and Di fathers; their views on the‘matching’ of donors and Dl fathers; their perception of Dl offspring's need or desire for information a…

  • Donor insemination

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•1996•Cited by: 14•References: 36

  • Information sharing in semen donation

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•1997•Cited by: 4•References: 12

  • The Best Interests of the Child in Assisted Human Reproduction

    Open Access•Ken Daniels, Ken R Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•2000•Cited by: 3•References: 5

    Developments in assisted human reproduction (AHR) have aroused considerable debate and interest around the world, with most governments accepting that they are matters of public policy. This politicization of AHR is explored in the context of a consideration of the oft-used term "the best interests of the child." This "rallying call" is frequently cited as the primary concern in the determination of policy. This article is based on the contention…

  • The (ir)relevance of genetics

    Open Access•Victoria M Grace, Ken Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Sociology of Health & Illness•2007•Cited by: 9•References: 16

    Informing offspring of the nature of their conception when conceived via donated gametes such as donor sperm, is increasingly considered by professionals and policy makers to be desirable for many reasons. The aim of this research is to explore and understand processes within families that either facilitate or hinder the telling of children about their conception. This exploration includes analysing the complexity of sociocultural processes surro…

  • The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family

    Open Access•Victoria M Grace, Ken Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2008•Cited by: 20•References: 13

  • Embryo Donation or Embryo Adoption? Practice and Policy in the New Zealand Context

    Sonja Goedeke, Ken Daniels et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Law…•2017•References: 5

    Embryo donation (ED) is the donation by a couple who have surplus embryos following IVF to another infertile person/s. There has been much debate as to whether ED can be understood as akin to gamete donation or as adoption, as these viewpoints evoke different health and welfare concerns and implications for the various parties. In this article, we discuss the legislative frameworks, policy guidelines, and practice of ED in New Zealand in comparis…

Reproductive Health and Technologies (12 works) · Psychology (11 works) · Medicine (10 works) · Political science (10 works) · Social Psychology (9 works) · Artificial insemination (8 works) · Biology (8 works) · Donor insemination (8 works) · Law (8 works) · Social Psychology (8 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae