Frédéric Amblard
Biographic Data
| ID | 259123 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Frédéric Amblard |
| GIVEN NAMES | Frédéric |
| FAMILY NAME | Amblard |
| SIGNATURE | AMBLARD F |
| AFFILIATIONS | Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2653-0857 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 13 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 29 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 11 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 2 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2000 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Advances in Artificial Economics
Dynamic Community Detection
Stability and Evolution of Scientific Networks
Climate Change on Twitter: Topics, Communities and Conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 Report
In September 2013 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published its Working Group 1 report, the first comprehensive assessment of physical climate science in six years, constituting a critical event in the societal debate about climate change. This paper analyses the nature of this debate in one public forum: Twitter. Using statistical methods, tweets were analyzed to discover the hashtags used when people tweeted about the IPCC report,…
The Results of Meadows and Cliff Are Wrong Because They Compute Indicator y Before Model Convergence
Meadows and Cliff (2012) failed to replicate the results of Deffuant et al. (2002) and concluded that our paper was wrong. In this note, we show that the conclusions of Meadows and Cliff are due to a wrong computation of indicator y, which was not fully specified in our 2002 paper. In particular, Meadows and Cliff compute indicator y before model convergence whereas this indicator should be computed after model convergence
Using dynamic community detection to identify trends in user-generated content
Selection in scientific networks
How can social network analysis improve the study of primate behavior
When living in a group, individuals have to make trade‐offs, and compromise, in order to balance the advantages and disadvantages of group life. Strategies that enable individuals to achieve this typically affect inter‐individual interactions resulting in nonrandom associations. Studying the patterns of this assortativity using social network analyses can allow us to explore how individual behavior influences what happens at the group, or populat…
Construire des sociétés artificielles pour comprendre les phénomènes sociaux réels
Nous présentons ici rapidement l’approche de modélisation et de simulation multi-agent, ses principales caractéristiques ainsi que son intérêt pour les sciences sociales. En particulier, nous insistons sur la proximité de cette formalisation avec des cadres de pensées classiques en sciences sociales comme l’individualisme méthodologique et nous proposons un usage possible de cette approche comme outil permettant de formaliser et d’interroger les …
Guess You’re Right on This One Too: Central and Peripheral Processing in Attitude Changes in Large Populations
An Individual-Based Model of Innovation Diffusion Mixing Social Value and Individual Benefit
The authors propose an individual‐based model of innovation diffusion and explore its main dynamical properties. In the model, individuals assign an a priori social value to an innovation which evolves during their interactions with the "relative agreement" influence model. This model offers the possibility of including a minority of "extremists" with extreme and very definite opinions. Individuals who give a high social value to the innovation t…
Interacting Agents and Continuous Opinions Dynamics
Mixing beliefs among interacting agents
We present a model of opinion dynamics in which agents adjust continuous opinions as a result of random binary encounters whenever their difference in opinion is below a given threshold. High thresholds yield convergence of opinions towards an average opinion, whereas low thresholds result in several opinion clusters: members of the same cluster share the same opinion but are no longer influenced by members of other clusters.
An Individual-Based Model of Innovation Diffusion Mixing Social Value and Individual Benefit
The authors propose an individual‐based model of innovation diffusion and explore its main dynamical properties. In the model, individuals assign an a priori social value to an innovation which evolves during their interactions with the "relative agreement" influence model. This model offers the possibility of including a minority of "extremists" with extreme and very definite opinions. Individuals who give a high social value to the innovation t…
Using dynamic community detection to identify trends in user-generated content
Selection in scientific networks
Mixing beliefs among interacting agents
We present a model of opinion dynamics in which agents adjust continuous opinions as a result of random binary encounters whenever their difference in opinion is below a given threshold. High thresholds yield convergence of opinions towards an average opinion, whereas low thresholds result in several opinion clusters: members of the same cluster share the same opinion but are no longer influenced by members of other clusters.
Interacting Agents and Continuous Opinions Dynamics
An Individual-Based Model of Innovation Diffusion Mixing Social Value and Individual Benefit
The authors propose an individual‐based model of innovation diffusion and explore its main dynamical properties. In the model, individuals assign an a priori social value to an innovation which evolves during their interactions with the "relative agreement" influence model. This model offers the possibility of including a minority of "extremists" with extreme and very definite opinions. Individuals who give a high social value to the innovation t…
Guess You’re Right on This One Too: Central and Peripheral Processing in Attitude Changes in Large Populations
Construire des sociétés artificielles pour comprendre les phénomènes sociaux réels
Nous présentons ici rapidement l’approche de modélisation et de simulation multi-agent, ses principales caractéristiques ainsi que son intérêt pour les sciences sociales. En particulier, nous insistons sur la proximité de cette formalisation avec des cadres de pensées classiques en sciences sociales comme l’individualisme méthodologique et nous proposons un usage possible de cette approche comme outil permettant de formaliser et d’interroger les …
How can social network analysis improve the study of primate behavior
When living in a group, individuals have to make trade‐offs, and compromise, in order to balance the advantages and disadvantages of group life. Strategies that enable individuals to achieve this typically affect inter‐individual interactions resulting in nonrandom associations. Studying the patterns of this assortativity using social network analyses can allow us to explore how individual behavior influences what happens at the group, or populat…
Using dynamic community detection to identify trends in user-generated content
Selection in scientific networks
The Results of Meadows and Cliff Are Wrong Because They Compute Indicator y Before Model Convergence
Meadows and Cliff (2012) failed to replicate the results of Deffuant et al. (2002) and concluded that our paper was wrong. In this note, we show that the conclusions of Meadows and Cliff are due to a wrong computation of indicator y, which was not fully specified in our 2002 paper. In particular, Meadows and Cliff compute indicator y before model convergence whereas this indicator should be computed after model convergence
Dynamic Community Detection
Stability and Evolution of Scientific Networks
Climate Change on Twitter: Topics, Communities and Conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 Report
In September 2013 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published its Working Group 1 report, the first comprehensive assessment of physical climate science in six years, constituting a critical event in the societal debate about climate change. This paper analyses the nature of this debate in one public forum: Twitter. Using statistical methods, tweets were analyzed to discover the hashtags used when people tweeted about the IPCC report,…
Advances in Artificial Economics
Computer Science (11 works) · Complex Network Analysis Techniques (7 works) · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (7 works) · Economics (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Data science (3 works) · Engineering (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · Social media (3 works)