Jessica Mozersky
Biographic Data
| ID | 259953 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jessica Mozersky |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jessica |
| FAMILY NAME | Mozersky |
| SIGNATURE | MOZERSKY J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Washington University in St. Louis |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4942-4571 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 10 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 12 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 10 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2010 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
A Community-Engaged Approach to Enhancing Participation in Genomic Research in Rare and Understudied Cancer Populations
The PEAB provided valuable feedback that improved the development and implementation of WU-PE-CGS research processes. Incorporating the PEAB's suggestions helped ensure that patients with rare and understudied cancers were successfully enrolled into the WU-PE-CGS. The PEAB will continue to contribute throughout all study phases
Examining relationships between multifactorial health beliefs and beliefs about the social implications of genetics
We examined how multifactorial (MF) beliefs about health relate to beliefs regarding the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of genomics research including genetic discrimination, determinism, and essentialism, and to demographic characteristics. We conducted an online, cross-sectional survey of 351 sociodemographically diverse U.S. adults (59% female, 56% having vocational-technical training or less education, 31% with low subjective …
Responsible Sharing of Qualitative Research Data: Insights From a Pioneering Project in the United States
Qualitative research data, such as data from focus groups and in-depth interviews, are increasingly made publicly available and used by secondary researchers, which promotes open science and improves research transparency. This has prompted concerns about the sensitivity of these data, participant confidentiality, data ownership, and the time burden and cost of de-identifying data. As more qualitative researchers (QRs) share sensitive data, they …
A Content Analysis of 100 Qualitative Health Research Articles to Examine Researcher-Participant Relationships and Implications for Data Sharing
We conducted a qualitative content analysis of health science literature ( N = 100) involving qualitative interviews or focus groups. Given recent data sharing mandates, our goal was to characterize the nature of relationships between the researchers and participants to inform ethical deliberations regarding qualitative data sharing and secondary analyses. Specifically, some researchers worry that data sharing might harm relationships, while othe…
Understanding the Use of Optimal Formatting and Plain Language When Presenting Key Information in Clinical Trials
Recent revisions to the Common Rule require that consent documents begin with a focused presentation of the study's key information that is organized to facilitate understanding. We surveyed 1,284 researchers working with older adults or individuals with Alzheimer's disease, supplemented with 60 qualitative interviews, to understand current use and barriers to using evidence-based formatting and plain language in key information. Researchers repo…
What's the Role of Time in Shared Decision Making
Shared decision making (SDM) is a desirable process and outcome of patient-clinician relationships. Ideally, patients and clinicians have sufficient time to engage in SDM. In reality, time is often insufficient. This article explores time as a barrier to SDM, alternative ways clinicians can think about time, and steps they can take to have fulfilling SDM interactions despite time constraints. Although discussions of time typically focus on time q…
Toward an Ethically Sensitive Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in the Global Context
Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell‐free DNA, which analyzes placental DNA circulating in maternal blood to provide information about fetal chromosomal disorders early in pregnancy and without risk to the fetus, has been hailed as a potential “paradigm shift” in prenatal genetic screening. Commercial provision of cell‐free DNA screening has contributed to a rapid expansion of the tests included in the screening panels. The tests can include…
Who's to blame? Accounts of genetic responsibility and blame among Ashkenazi Jewish women at risk of BRCA breast cancer
Genetic knowledge of disease risk may induce a sense of genetic responsibility whereby those who are at risk feel an obligation to take certain actions not only in relation to their own personal health but also to their family, their children and many other aspects of their life. This article examines genetic responsibility among Ashkenazi Jewish women at increased risk of BRCA genetic breast cancer. It demonstrates the ways in which accounts of …
Case studies in the co-production of populations and genetics: The making of ‘at risk populations’ in BRCA genetics
Special section: Perspectives on globalising genomics: The case of ‘BRCA’ breast cancer research and medical practice
Who's to blame? Accounts of genetic responsibility and blame among Ashkenazi Jewish women at risk of BRCA breast cancer
Genetic knowledge of disease risk may induce a sense of genetic responsibility whereby those who are at risk feel an obligation to take certain actions not only in relation to their own personal health but also to their family, their children and many other aspects of their life. This article examines genetic responsibility among Ashkenazi Jewish women at increased risk of BRCA genetic breast cancer. It demonstrates the ways in which accounts of …
A Content Analysis of 100 Qualitative Health Research Articles to Examine Researcher-Participant Relationships and Implications for Data Sharing
We conducted a qualitative content analysis of health science literature ( N = 100) involving qualitative interviews or focus groups. Given recent data sharing mandates, our goal was to characterize the nature of relationships between the researchers and participants to inform ethical deliberations regarding qualitative data sharing and secondary analyses. Specifically, some researchers worry that data sharing might harm relationships, while othe…
Case studies in the co-production of populations and genetics: The making of ‘at risk populations’ in BRCA genetics
Special section: Perspectives on globalising genomics: The case of ‘BRCA’ breast cancer research and medical practice
Who's to blame? Accounts of genetic responsibility and blame among Ashkenazi Jewish women at risk of BRCA breast cancer
Genetic knowledge of disease risk may induce a sense of genetic responsibility whereby those who are at risk feel an obligation to take certain actions not only in relation to their own personal health but also to their family, their children and many other aspects of their life. This article examines genetic responsibility among Ashkenazi Jewish women at increased risk of BRCA genetic breast cancer. It demonstrates the ways in which accounts of …
Toward an Ethically Sensitive Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in the Global Context
Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell‐free DNA, which analyzes placental DNA circulating in maternal blood to provide information about fetal chromosomal disorders early in pregnancy and without risk to the fetus, has been hailed as a potential “paradigm shift” in prenatal genetic screening. Commercial provision of cell‐free DNA screening has contributed to a rapid expansion of the tests included in the screening panels. The tests can include…
What's the Role of Time in Shared Decision Making
Shared decision making (SDM) is a desirable process and outcome of patient-clinician relationships. Ideally, patients and clinicians have sufficient time to engage in SDM. In reality, time is often insufficient. This article explores time as a barrier to SDM, alternative ways clinicians can think about time, and steps they can take to have fulfilling SDM interactions despite time constraints. Although discussions of time typically focus on time q…
Understanding the Use of Optimal Formatting and Plain Language When Presenting Key Information in Clinical Trials
Recent revisions to the Common Rule require that consent documents begin with a focused presentation of the study's key information that is organized to facilitate understanding. We surveyed 1,284 researchers working with older adults or individuals with Alzheimer's disease, supplemented with 60 qualitative interviews, to understand current use and barriers to using evidence-based formatting and plain language in key information. Researchers repo…
A Content Analysis of 100 Qualitative Health Research Articles to Examine Researcher-Participant Relationships and Implications for Data Sharing
We conducted a qualitative content analysis of health science literature ( N = 100) involving qualitative interviews or focus groups. Given recent data sharing mandates, our goal was to characterize the nature of relationships between the researchers and participants to inform ethical deliberations regarding qualitative data sharing and secondary analyses. Specifically, some researchers worry that data sharing might harm relationships, while othe…
A Community-Engaged Approach to Enhancing Participation in Genomic Research in Rare and Understudied Cancer Populations
The PEAB provided valuable feedback that improved the development and implementation of WU-PE-CGS research processes. Incorporating the PEAB's suggestions helped ensure that patients with rare and understudied cancers were successfully enrolled into the WU-PE-CGS. The PEAB will continue to contribute throughout all study phases
Examining relationships between multifactorial health beliefs and beliefs about the social implications of genetics
We examined how multifactorial (MF) beliefs about health relate to beliefs regarding the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of genomics research including genetic discrimination, determinism, and essentialism, and to demographic characteristics. We conducted an online, cross-sectional survey of 351 sociodemographically diverse U.S. adults (59% female, 56% having vocational-technical training or less education, 31% with low subjective …
Responsible Sharing of Qualitative Research Data: Insights From a Pioneering Project in the United States
Qualitative research data, such as data from focus groups and in-depth interviews, are increasingly made publicly available and used by secondary researchers, which promotes open science and improves research transparency. This has prompted concerns about the sensitivity of these data, participant confidentiality, data ownership, and the time burden and cost of de-identifying data. As more qualitative researchers (QRs) share sensitive data, they …
Medicine (6 works) · Computer Science (5 works) · Biology (4 works) · BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 works) · Genetics (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Cancer (3 works) · Race, Genetics, and Society (3 works) · Alternative medicine (2 works)