Richard Barke
Biographic Data
| ID | 2817507 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Richard Barke |
| GIVEN NAMES | Richard |
| FAMILY NAME | Barke |
| SIGNATURE | BARKE R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Georgia Institute of Technology |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 4 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1985 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2009 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Balancing Uncertain Risks and Benefits in Human Subjects Research
Composed of scientific and technical experts and lay members, thousands of research ethics committees-Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States-must identify and assess the potential risks to human research subjects, and balance those risks against the potential benefits of the research. IRBs handle risk and its uncertainty by adopting a version of the precautionary principle. To assess scientific merit, IRBs use a tacit ``sanguinit…
News
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Policy Learning and the Evolution of Federal Hazardous Waste Policy
Balancing Uncertain Risks and Benefits in Human Subjects Research
Composed of scientific and technical experts and lay members, thousands of research ethics committees-Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States-must identify and assess the potential risks to human research subjects, and balance those risks against the potential benefits of the research. IRBs handle risk and its uncertainty by adopting a version of the precautionary principle. To assess scientific merit, IRBs use a tacit ``sanguinit…
Policy Learning and the Evolution of Federal Hazardous Waste Policy
Policy Learning and the Evolution of Federal Hazardous Waste Policy
News
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Balancing Uncertain Risks and Benefits in Human Subjects Research
Composed of scientific and technical experts and lay members, thousands of research ethics committees-Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States-must identify and assess the potential risks to human research subjects, and balance those risks against the potential benefits of the research. IRBs handle risk and its uncertainty by adopting a version of the precautionary principle. To assess scientific merit, IRBs use a tacit ``sanguinit…
Computer Science (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Action (physics (1 work) · Business (1 work) · Citation (1 work) · Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies (1 work) · Economics (1 work) · Engineering ethics (1 work)