Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ben Eggleston

Biographic Data

ID2833409
NAMEBen Eggleston
GIVEN NAMESBen
FAMILY NAMEEggleston
SIGNATUREBEN EGGLESTON
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Kansas
ORCID0000-0001-8998-0188
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS11
TOTAL CITATIONS5
WORKS AS AUTHOR10
WORKS AS EDITOR1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2003
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2
  • Some Acts Really Harm

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2025•References: 2

    An important strand of argument in Alastair Norcross's Morality by Degrees: Reasons without Demands is the rejection of the standard account of harm, which underwrites non-comparative statements of the form “act A harms person X.” According to Norcross, the correct account of harm is a contextualist one that only underwrites comparative statements of the form “act A results in a worse world for X than alternative act B, and a better world than al…

  • A Letter from the New Editor

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2022

    An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button

  • Ending Print Publication After December 2022 Issue

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2022

    An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button

  • Consequentialism and Respect

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    Most arguments in support of act utilitarianism are elaborations of one of two basic strategies. One is the consequentialist strategy. This strategy relies on the consequentialist premise that an act is right if and only if it produces the best possible consequences and the welfarist premise that the value of a state of affairs is entirely determined by its overall amount of well-being. The other strategy is based on the idea of treating individu…

  • Thomas Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (Cambridge, MA

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2015

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • The Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism

    Open Access•Krister Bykvist, James E Crimmins et al.•EDITOR•BOOK•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

    Utilitarianism, the approach to ethics based on the maximization of overall well-being, continues to have great traction in moral philosophy and political thought. This Companion offers a systematic exploration of its history, themes, and applications. First, it traces the origins and development of utilitarianism via the work of Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Henry Sidgwick, and others. The volume then explores issues in the formulation of ut…

  • Rejecting The Publicity Condition

    Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2013•Cited by: 2

    It is often thought that some version of what is generally called the publicity condition is a reasonable requirement to impose on moral theories.In this article, after formulating and distinguishing three versions of the publicity condition, I argue that the arguments typically used to defend them are unsuccessful and, moreover, that even in its most plausible version, the publicity condition ought to be rejected as both question-begging and unr…

  • Utilitarianism

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•CHAPTER•Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics•2012

  • The Problem of Rational Compliance with Rules

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2009

  • Tim Mulgan, The Demands of Consequentialism (Oxford

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2009

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Does Participation Matter? An Inconsistency in Parfit's Moral Mathematics

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2003•Cited by: 2

    Consequentialists typically think that the moral quality of one's conduct depends on the difference one makes. But consequentialists may also think that even if one is not making a difference, the moral quality of one's conduct can still be affected by whether one is participating (even if only ineffectually, or redundantly) in an endeavour that does make a difference. Derek Parfit discusses this issue – the moral significance of what I call ‘par…

  • Rejecting The Publicity Condition

    Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2013•Cited by: 2

    It is often thought that some version of what is generally called the publicity condition is a reasonable requirement to impose on moral theories.In this article, after formulating and distinguishing three versions of the publicity condition, I argue that the arguments typically used to defend them are unsuccessful and, moreover, that even in its most plausible version, the publicity condition ought to be rejected as both question-begging and unr…

  • Does Participation Matter? An Inconsistency in Parfit's Moral Mathematics

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2003•Cited by: 2

    Consequentialists typically think that the moral quality of one's conduct depends on the difference one makes. But consequentialists may also think that even if one is not making a difference, the moral quality of one's conduct can still be affected by whether one is participating (even if only ineffectually, or redundantly) in an endeavour that does make a difference. Derek Parfit discusses this issue – the moral significance of what I call ‘par…

  • Consequentialism and Respect

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    Most arguments in support of act utilitarianism are elaborations of one of two basic strategies. One is the consequentialist strategy. This strategy relies on the consequentialist premise that an act is right if and only if it produces the best possible consequences and the welfarist premise that the value of a state of affairs is entirely determined by its overall amount of well-being. The other strategy is based on the idea of treating individu…

  • Does Participation Matter? An Inconsistency in Parfit's Moral Mathematics

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2003•Cited by: 2

    Consequentialists typically think that the moral quality of one's conduct depends on the difference one makes. But consequentialists may also think that even if one is not making a difference, the moral quality of one's conduct can still be affected by whether one is participating (even if only ineffectually, or redundantly) in an endeavour that does make a difference. Derek Parfit discusses this issue – the moral significance of what I call ‘par…

  • The Problem of Rational Compliance with Rules

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2009

  • Tim Mulgan, The Demands of Consequentialism (Oxford

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2009

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Utilitarianism

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•CHAPTER•Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics•2012

  • Rejecting The Publicity Condition

    Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2013•Cited by: 2

    It is often thought that some version of what is generally called the publicity condition is a reasonable requirement to impose on moral theories.In this article, after formulating and distinguishing three versions of the publicity condition, I argue that the arguments typically used to defend them are unsuccessful and, moreover, that even in its most plausible version, the publicity condition ought to be rejected as both question-begging and unr…

  • The Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism

    Open Access•Krister Bykvist, James E Crimmins et al.•EDITOR•BOOK•Cambridge Companion to…•2014

    Utilitarianism, the approach to ethics based on the maximization of overall well-being, continues to have great traction in moral philosophy and political thought. This Companion offers a systematic exploration of its history, themes, and applications. First, it traces the origins and development of utilitarianism via the work of Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Henry Sidgwick, and others. The volume then explores issues in the formulation of ut…

  • Thomas Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (Cambridge, MA

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2015

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Consequentialism and Respect

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    Most arguments in support of act utilitarianism are elaborations of one of two basic strategies. One is the consequentialist strategy. This strategy relies on the consequentialist premise that an act is right if and only if it produces the best possible consequences and the welfarist premise that the value of a state of affairs is entirely determined by its overall amount of well-being. The other strategy is based on the idea of treating individu…

  • A Letter from the New Editor

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2022

    An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button

  • Ending Print Publication After December 2022 Issue

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2022

    An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button

  • Some Acts Really Harm

    Open Access•Ben Eggleston•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2025•References: 2

    An important strand of argument in Alastair Norcross's Morality by Degrees: Reasons without Demands is the rejection of the standard account of harm, which underwrites non-comparative statements of the form “act A harms person X.” According to Norcross, the correct account of harm is a contextualist one that only underwrites comparative statements of the form “act A results in a worse world for X than alternative act B, and a better world than al…

Philosophy (7 works) · Economics (6 works) · Epistemology (6 works) · Political science (6 works) · Law (5 works) · Law and economics (5 works) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 works) · Sociology (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae