Ronen Shnayderman
Biographic Data
| ID | 2833924 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Ronen Shnayderman |
| GIVEN NAMES | Ronen |
| FAMILY NAME | Shnayderman |
| SIGNATURE | SHNAYDERMAN R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Universität Hamburg |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 18 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2012 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
The Impossibility of “Freedom as Independence
Most of the recent work on freedom is concerned with the liberal-republican debate. The latest move in this debate has been made by List and Valentini who argue in favor of a conception of freedom (called “freedom as independence”) that is located midway between the liberal and republican conceptions. In this article, we review some key aspects of the debate that led to List and Valentini’s move and then argue that their midway position is untena…
Germ-Line Genetic Information as a Natural Resource as a Means to Achieving Luck-Egalitarian Equality
Causal Tests in Subjunctive Judgements About Negative Freedom
Social Freedom, Moral Responsibility, Actions and Omissions
Journal Article Social Freedom, Moral Responsibility, Actions and Omissions Get access Ronen Shnayderman Ronen Shnayderman University of Hamburg Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 63, Issue 253, October 2013, Pages 716–739, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.12067 Published: 13 September 2013
Freedom, self-ownership, and equality in Steiner’s left-libertarianism
Hillel Steiner’s left-libertarian theory of justice is the most serious recent attempt to reconcile the ideals of (luck-egalitarian) equality and freedom. This attempt consists in an argument that a universal right to equal freedom, which in Steiner’s view means also a universal right to maximal freedom, implies a universal right to self-ownership and to an egalitarian share of the world’s natural resources. In this article, I argue that this arg…
Liberal vs. Republican Notions of Freedom
One of the most interesting current debates about the ideal of freedom is the debate between the adherents of the recently revived republican notion of negative freedom, most notably Quentin Skinner and Philip Pettit, and the adherents of the prevailing liberal notion of negative freedom, most notably Ian Carter and Matthew Kramer. The debate between these two parties concerns the question of what negative freedom is. While Carter and Kramer argu…
Liberal vs. Republican Notions of Freedom
One of the most interesting current debates about the ideal of freedom is the debate between the adherents of the recently revived republican notion of negative freedom, most notably Quentin Skinner and Philip Pettit, and the adherents of the prevailing liberal notion of negative freedom, most notably Ian Carter and Matthew Kramer. The debate between these two parties concerns the question of what negative freedom is. While Carter and Kramer argu…
The Impossibility of “Freedom as Independence
Most of the recent work on freedom is concerned with the liberal-republican debate. The latest move in this debate has been made by List and Valentini who argue in favor of a conception of freedom (called “freedom as independence”) that is located midway between the liberal and republican conceptions. In this article, we review some key aspects of the debate that led to List and Valentini’s move and then argue that their midway position is untena…
Freedom, self-ownership, and equality in Steiner’s left-libertarianism
Hillel Steiner’s left-libertarian theory of justice is the most serious recent attempt to reconcile the ideals of (luck-egalitarian) equality and freedom. This attempt consists in an argument that a universal right to equal freedom, which in Steiner’s view means also a universal right to maximal freedom, implies a universal right to self-ownership and to an egalitarian share of the world’s natural resources. In this article, I argue that this arg…
Social Freedom, Moral Responsibility, Actions and Omissions
Journal Article Social Freedom, Moral Responsibility, Actions and Omissions Get access Ronen Shnayderman Ronen Shnayderman University of Hamburg Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 63, Issue 253, October 2013, Pages 716–739, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.12067 Published: 13 September 2013
Freedom, self-ownership, and equality in Steiner’s left-libertarianism
Hillel Steiner’s left-libertarian theory of justice is the most serious recent attempt to reconcile the ideals of (luck-egalitarian) equality and freedom. This attempt consists in an argument that a universal right to equal freedom, which in Steiner’s view means also a universal right to maximal freedom, implies a universal right to self-ownership and to an egalitarian share of the world’s natural resources. In this article, I argue that this arg…
Liberal vs. Republican Notions of Freedom
One of the most interesting current debates about the ideal of freedom is the debate between the adherents of the recently revived republican notion of negative freedom, most notably Quentin Skinner and Philip Pettit, and the adherents of the prevailing liberal notion of negative freedom, most notably Ian Carter and Matthew Kramer. The debate between these two parties concerns the question of what negative freedom is. While Carter and Kramer argu…
Social Freedom, Moral Responsibility, Actions and Omissions
Journal Article Social Freedom, Moral Responsibility, Actions and Omissions Get access Ronen Shnayderman Ronen Shnayderman University of Hamburg Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 63, Issue 253, October 2013, Pages 716–739, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.12067 Published: 13 September 2013
Causal Tests in Subjunctive Judgements About Negative Freedom
Germ-Line Genetic Information as a Natural Resource as a Means to Achieving Luck-Egalitarian Equality
The Impossibility of “Freedom as Independence
Most of the recent work on freedom is concerned with the liberal-republican debate. The latest move in this debate has been made by List and Valentini who argue in favor of a conception of freedom (called “freedom as independence”) that is located midway between the liberal and republican conceptions. In this article, we review some key aspects of the debate that led to List and Valentini’s move and then argue that their midway position is untena…
Epistemology (6 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Law (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Law and economics (4 works) · Economics (3 works)