Zoi Terzopoulou
Biographic Data
| ID | 3084845 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Zoi Terzopoulou |
| GIVEN NAMES | Zoi |
| FAMILY NAME | Terzopoulou |
| SIGNATURE | TERZOPOULOU Z |
| AFFILIATIONS | Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St Etienne |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5289-434X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Approval compatible voting rules
Ranking rankings
Managing and aggregating group evidence under quality and quantity trade-offs
Trade-offs between quality and quantity arise in an abundance of contexts concerning group decision making. With the starting point being that group members provide more accurate evidence when they are involved with fewer tasks, team managers often encounter the following dilemma: Should they assign their group members with many tasks (attempting to gather more evidence with lower quality), or with fewer tasks (aiming at receiving less, but more …
Strategic manipulation in judgment aggregation under higher-level reasoning
We analyse the incentives of individuals to misrepresent their truthful judgments when engaged in collective decision-making. Our focus is on scenarios in which individuals reason about the incentives of others before choosing which judgments to report themselves. To this end, we introduce a formal model of strategic behaviour in logic-based judgment aggregation that accounts for such higher-level reasoning as well as the fact that individuals ma…
Quota rules for incomplete judgments
No prominent works on this page.
Quota rules for incomplete judgments
Strategic manipulation in judgment aggregation under higher-level reasoning
We analyse the incentives of individuals to misrepresent their truthful judgments when engaged in collective decision-making. Our focus is on scenarios in which individuals reason about the incentives of others before choosing which judgments to report themselves. To this end, we introduce a formal model of strategic behaviour in logic-based judgment aggregation that accounts for such higher-level reasoning as well as the fact that individuals ma…
Managing and aggregating group evidence under quality and quantity trade-offs
Trade-offs between quality and quantity arise in an abundance of contexts concerning group decision making. With the starting point being that group members provide more accurate evidence when they are involved with fewer tasks, team managers often encounter the following dilemma: Should they assign their group members with many tasks (attempting to gather more evidence with lower quality), or with fewer tasks (aiming at receiving less, but more …
Ranking rankings
Approval compatible voting rules
Computer Science (5 works) · Economics (5 works) · Game Theory and Voting Systems (4 works) · Microeconomics (3 works) · Econometrics (2 works) · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 works) · Mathematical economics (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works)