Jonathan Luckhurst
Biographic Data
| ID | 3087324 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jonathan Luckhurst |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jonathan |
| FAMILY NAME | Luckhurst |
| SIGNATURE | LUCKHURST J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Soka University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 11 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 9 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2012 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Networked G20 Governance of Covid-19 and its Transversal Crisis Effect
In this article, the Group of 20’s (G20) networked pluralism and transversal policy practices in the governance of COVID-19 and the pandemic crisis effect are analyzed. The G20 is an important global governance hub, with the strategic capacities and authority to improve cooperation on the pandemic and economic recovery efforts. The forum’s increasingly pluralistic networkedgovernance processes have been crucial for recent shifts in global governa…
The New G20 Politics of Global Economic Governance
This article demonstrates how the Group of Twenty (G20) constituted a new G20 politics following the 2008–09 global financial crisis through practices of networked global economic governance. This increased the influence of actors other than officials from leading wealthy states, especially developing- and non-state actors, thus augmenting global governance inclusivity and decentralizing authority. The G20 became the principal hub of global econo…
The G20 Hub of Decentralizing Global Governance Authority
This article examines how the Group of Twenty (G20) became a hub of decentralizing authority in global economic governance since the 2008-09 global financial crisis.It analyzes how this forum responded to the crisis by decentralizing authority away from the Group of Seven/Eight (G7/8) and integrating more diverse actors and networks in global governance.The G20 also became an important hub for diffusing new policy norms and practices.These global…
Governance networks shaping the G20 through inclusivity practices
This article analyses how global governance networks contest, influence, and shape the Group of Twenty (G20) forum through the latter’s growing inclusivity practices, with important effects on global economic governance norms and practices. These transnational networks include public, intergovernmental, private, and civil society actors that interact through professional ‘ecologies.’ Some network actors participate in the G20’s official engagemen…
L atin A merica in the G 20
This article analyzes endogenous and exogenous constructions of the political identities of L atin A merican members of the G 20, namely A rgentina, B razil, and M exico. It examines effects of G 20 membership and other aspects of international relations, with a constructivist analysis of their political identities as “insiders” or “outsiders” in multilateral economic governance. G 20 scholars note the forum's heterogeneity of coalitions on diver…
Building Cooperation between the BRICS and Leading Industrialized States
This article examines relations between the BRICS and leading industrialized states. It starts by analyzing the former's mutual relations, focusing on how the ideational construct presented by J im O 'Neill in his “ BRIC hypothesis” became formalized as a leader‐level diplomatic group at a summit in Y ekaterinburg, R ussia, in 2009. I evaluate how the BRICS have influenced international issues and whether “cooperation” or “conflict” characterizes…
The G20 and ad hoc Embedded Liberalism
The September 2008 financial market collapse and subsequent world economic crisis have significantly influenced international scholarly debate, policy practice, and economic relations. The economic crisis has led experts and policy actors to redefine core aspects of economic governance. I analyze current competing perspectives on economic issues within the Group of Twenty (G20) and argue that discursive contestation has delegitimized previous neo…
Introduction to the Special Issue
This special issue demonstrates how key governance areas and democratization have been impacted by the world economic crisis since September 2008. It provides a historical contextualization of recent events, as well as analysis of diverse policy issues using theoretical and empirical case evidence. The authors examine how governance, economic policies, international cooperation, and effective norms can be enhanced through strategic measures. Also…
Governance and Democratization since the 2008 Financial Crisis
This conclusion to the special issue on governance, democratization, and the world economic crisis argues the special significance of the latter for contemporary trends in development and democratization. Crises can encourage policy makers and societies to reconsider important aspects of governance, indeed this can be a beneficial consequence if the right lessons are learned. Major international economic crises can thus undermine existing convent…
The G20 and ad hoc Embedded Liberalism
The September 2008 financial market collapse and subsequent world economic crisis have significantly influenced international scholarly debate, policy practice, and economic relations. The economic crisis has led experts and policy actors to redefine core aspects of economic governance. I analyze current competing perspectives on economic issues within the Group of Twenty (G20) and argue that discursive contestation has delegitimized previous neo…
The G20 Hub of Decentralizing Global Governance Authority
This article examines how the Group of Twenty (G20) became a hub of decentralizing authority in global economic governance since the 2008-09 global financial crisis.It analyzes how this forum responded to the crisis by decentralizing authority away from the Group of Seven/Eight (G7/8) and integrating more diverse actors and networks in global governance.The G20 also became an important hub for diffusing new policy norms and practices.These global…
The New G20 Politics of Global Economic Governance
This article demonstrates how the Group of Twenty (G20) constituted a new G20 politics following the 2008–09 global financial crisis through practices of networked global economic governance. This increased the influence of actors other than officials from leading wealthy states, especially developing- and non-state actors, thus augmenting global governance inclusivity and decentralizing authority. The G20 became the principal hub of global econo…
Governance networks shaping the G20 through inclusivity practices
This article analyses how global governance networks contest, influence, and shape the Group of Twenty (G20) forum through the latter’s growing inclusivity practices, with important effects on global economic governance norms and practices. These transnational networks include public, intergovernmental, private, and civil society actors that interact through professional ‘ecologies.’ Some network actors participate in the G20’s official engagemen…
Building Cooperation between the BRICS and Leading Industrialized States
This article examines relations between the BRICS and leading industrialized states. It starts by analyzing the former's mutual relations, focusing on how the ideational construct presented by J im O 'Neill in his “ BRIC hypothesis” became formalized as a leader‐level diplomatic group at a summit in Y ekaterinburg, R ussia, in 2009. I evaluate how the BRICS have influenced international issues and whether “cooperation” or “conflict” characterizes…
The G20 and ad hoc Embedded Liberalism
The September 2008 financial market collapse and subsequent world economic crisis have significantly influenced international scholarly debate, policy practice, and economic relations. The economic crisis has led experts and policy actors to redefine core aspects of economic governance. I analyze current competing perspectives on economic issues within the Group of Twenty (G20) and argue that discursive contestation has delegitimized previous neo…
Introduction to the Special Issue
This special issue demonstrates how key governance areas and democratization have been impacted by the world economic crisis since September 2008. It provides a historical contextualization of recent events, as well as analysis of diverse policy issues using theoretical and empirical case evidence. The authors examine how governance, economic policies, international cooperation, and effective norms can be enhanced through strategic measures. Also…
Governance and Democratization since the 2008 Financial Crisis
This conclusion to the special issue on governance, democratization, and the world economic crisis argues the special significance of the latter for contemporary trends in development and democratization. Crises can encourage policy makers and societies to reconsider important aspects of governance, indeed this can be a beneficial consequence if the right lessons are learned. Major international economic crises can thus undermine existing convent…
Building Cooperation between the BRICS and Leading Industrialized States
This article examines relations between the BRICS and leading industrialized states. It starts by analyzing the former's mutual relations, focusing on how the ideational construct presented by J im O 'Neill in his “ BRIC hypothesis” became formalized as a leader‐level diplomatic group at a summit in Y ekaterinburg, R ussia, in 2009. I evaluate how the BRICS have influenced international issues and whether “cooperation” or “conflict” characterizes…
L atin A merica in the G 20
This article analyzes endogenous and exogenous constructions of the political identities of L atin A merican members of the G 20, namely A rgentina, B razil, and M exico. It examines effects of G 20 membership and other aspects of international relations, with a constructivist analysis of their political identities as “insiders” or “outsiders” in multilateral economic governance. G 20 scholars note the forum's heterogeneity of coalitions on diver…
The G20 Hub of Decentralizing Global Governance Authority
This article examines how the Group of Twenty (G20) became a hub of decentralizing authority in global economic governance since the 2008-09 global financial crisis.It analyzes how this forum responded to the crisis by decentralizing authority away from the Group of Seven/Eight (G7/8) and integrating more diverse actors and networks in global governance.The G20 also became an important hub for diffusing new policy norms and practices.These global…
Governance networks shaping the G20 through inclusivity practices
This article analyses how global governance networks contest, influence, and shape the Group of Twenty (G20) forum through the latter’s growing inclusivity practices, with important effects on global economic governance norms and practices. These transnational networks include public, intergovernmental, private, and civil society actors that interact through professional ‘ecologies.’ Some network actors participate in the G20’s official engagemen…
The New G20 Politics of Global Economic Governance
This article demonstrates how the Group of Twenty (G20) constituted a new G20 politics following the 2008–09 global financial crisis through practices of networked global economic governance. This increased the influence of actors other than officials from leading wealthy states, especially developing- and non-state actors, thus augmenting global governance inclusivity and decentralizing authority. The G20 became the principal hub of global econo…
Networked G20 Governance of Covid-19 and its Transversal Crisis Effect
In this article, the Group of 20’s (G20) networked pluralism and transversal policy practices in the governance of COVID-19 and the pandemic crisis effect are analyzed. The G20 is an important global governance hub, with the strategic capacities and authority to improve cooperation on the pandemic and economic recovery efforts. The forum’s increasingly pluralistic networkedgovernance processes have been crucial for recent shifts in global governa…
Economics (9 works) · Political science (9 works) · Corporate governance (8 works) · Politics (8 works) · Law (7 works) · Political economy (7 works) · Law (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · International Development and Aid (5 works) · Public Administration (5 works)