Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

David Soskice

Biographic Data

ID333600
NAMEDavid Soskice
GIVEN NAMESDavid
FAMILY NAMESoskice
SIGNATURESOSKICE D
AFFILIATIONSDuke University
ORCID0000-0002-0643-8869
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS48
TOTAL CITATIONS1678
AUTHOR COUNT45
EDITOR COUNT3
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1968
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX17
  • Tracing the Relationship between Inequality, Crime and Punishment: Space, Time and Politics

    Nicola Lacey, David Soskice et al.•BOOK•Tracing the Relationship Between…•2021

    The question of inequality has moved decisively to the top of the contemporary intellectual agenda. Going beyond Thomas Piketty’s focus on wealth, increasing inequalities of various kinds, and their impact on social, political and economic life, now present themselves among the most urgent issues facing scholars in the humanities and the social sciences. Key among these is the relationship between inequality, crime and punishment. The proposition…

  • Transformations of advanced capitalist democracies in the digital era

    Open Access•David Soskice•ARTICLE•Transfer European Review of…•2021

  • Response to Carles Boix’s review of Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism through a Turbulent Century

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Perspectives on Politics•2020

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism through a Turbulent Century

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•BOOK•Democracy and Prosperity•2019

    It is a widespread view that democracy and the advanced nation-state are in crisis, weakened by globalization and undermined by global capitalism, in turn explaining rising inequality and mounting populism. This book argues that this view is wrong: advanced democracies are resilient, and their enduring historical relationship with capitalism has been mutually beneficial. For all the chaos and upheaval over the past century—major wars, economic cr…

  • Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism through a Turbulent Century

    Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•BOOK•Democracy and Prosperity•2019•Cited by: 20

  • Comparing Serious Violent Crime in the United States and England and Wales

    Zelia Gallo, Nicola Lacey et al.•BOOK•American Exceptionalism in Crime…•2017

    This chapter shows how reasonably valid comparative data for violent crime in the United States and England and Wales can be derived. Comparative analysis of violent crime is hampered by a lack of reliable statistics, even between relatively similar countries, with doubts about existing studies suggesting that further comparative data are needed. Violent crime presents particular problems of variation in offense definition and recording practices…

  • American Exceptionalism in Crime, Punishment, and Disadvantage

    Nicola Lacey, Kevin R Reitz et al.•BOOK•American Exceptionalism in Crime…•2017

    This chapter sets a particular thesis focused on the institutional structure of the American political system within the context of a broader literature in the comparative political economy of crime and punishment. It then considers three possible objections to this analysis. The first argues that increasing American exceptionalism in the postwar period is to be explained primarily in terms of a distinctive history and politics of race. The next …

  • Growth Models, Varieties of Capitalism, and Macroeconomics

    Open Access•Diane Hope, David Hopes et al.•ARTICLE•Latin American Politics and Society•2016•Cited by: 34•References: 4

    Lucio Baccaro and Jonas Pontusson make a significant contribution to comparative political economy with their approach to analyzing growth in advanced economies, which focuses on the demand side of the economy and distributive conflict. In contrast to Baccaro and Pontusson, however, we view their approach as reinforcing recent developments in varieties of capitalism rather than undermining them. We also believe that the type of modern macroeconom…

  • Crime, punishment and segregation in the United States: The paradox of local democracy

    Open Access•Nicola Lacey, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Punishment & Society•2015•Cited by: 28•References: 21

    Patterns of crime and punishment in the USA greatly magnify corresponding developments in other liberal market economies – Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK – faced with similar broad macro-technological transformations, namely the collapse of Fordism in the 1970s and 1980s and the development of knowledge economies in the 1990s and 2000s. In this article, we set out the case for seeing these differences as largely the product of dynamics…

  • Politics for markets

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Journal of European Social Policy•2015•Cited by: 17•References: 23

    We argue that the welfare state operates very differently in the advanced sectors of modern economies and in the low-skill sectors. Governments are concerned to promote the advanced sectors of their economies in which they have comparative advantage. This is a valence issue not a partisan one. Where companies and employees in advanced sectors co-invest heavily in company-specific skills, then governments will be concerned to maintain insurance in…

  • Democratic Limits to Redistribution: Inclusionary versus Exclusionary Coalitions in the Knowledge Economy

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•World Politics•2015•Cited by: 68•References: 22

    The knowledge economy, deindustrialization, and the decline of Fordism have undermined the economic complementarities that once existed between skilled and semiskilled workers. The result has everywhere been a decline in coordinated wage bargaining and unionization and a notable rise in labor market inequality. Yet, the political responses have been very different across advanced democracies. While labor markets for part-time and temporary employ…

  • Information, Inequality, and Mass Polarization: Ideology in Advanced Democracies

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•Comparative Political Studies•2015•Cited by: 64•References: 39

    Growing polarization in the American Congress is closely related to rising income inequality. Yet there has been no corresponding polarization of the U.S. electorate, and across advanced democracies, mass polarization is negatively related to income inequality. To explain this puzzle, we propose a comparative political economy model of mass polarization in which the same institutional factors that generate income inequality also undermine politic…

  • The Transformation of the German Social Model

    Wendy Carlin, Anke Hassel et al.•CHAPTER•European social models from…•2014

    Market and state actors' responses to Germany's reunification and its economic repercussions partially liberalized its social model, increasing segmentation between a decreasing core labor force with job security and an increasing proportion of workers with atypical, less secure, and typically lower paid jobs. Collective bargaining was decentralized and its wage-setting role diminished, permitting increased wage dispersion and hours flexibility. …

  • Capital in the twenty-first century: A Critique

    Open Access•David Soskice•ARTICLE•British Journal of Sociology•2014•Cited by: 10•References: 9

    I set out and explain Piketty's model of the dynamics of capitalism based on two equations and the r > g inequality (his central contradiction of capitalism). I then take issue with Piketty's analysis of the rebuilding of inequality from the 1970s to the present on three grounds: First, his model is based on the (neo-classical) assumption that companies are essentially passive actors who invest the amount savers choose to accumulate at equilibriu…

  • Inequality and Redistribution: A Unified Approach to the Role of Economic and Political Institutions

    Trine Iversen, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Revue économique•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    Cet article explique la persistance de disparités dans les niveaux d’inégalité et de protection sociale au sein des économies développées en termes de variétés de capitalismes et de systèmes politiques. Là où le capitalisme est coordonné, comme en Europe du Nord, les systèmes politiques sont fondés sur le consensus et les élections se font à la proportionnelle ; la politique de consensus et le capitalisme coordonné se renforcent mutuellement pour…

  • Informal Social Networks and Rational Voting

    Open Access•Samuel J Abram, Samuel Abram et al.•ARTICLE•British Journal of Political…•2011•Cited by: 57•References: 51

    Classical rational choice explanations of voting participation are widely thought to have failed. This article argues that the currently dominant Group Mobilization and Ethical Agency approaches have serious shortcomings in explaining individually rational turnout. It develops an informal social network (ISN) model in which people rationally vote if their informal networks of family and friends attach enough importance to voting, because voting l…

  • Coevolution of Capitalism and Political Representation: The Choice of Electoral Systems

    Open Access•Thomas R Cusack, Thomas Cusack et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2010•Cited by: 26•References: 27

    Protocorporatist West European countries in which economic interests were collectively organized adopted PR in the first quarter of the twentieth century, whereas liberal countries in which economic interests were not collectively organized did not. Political parties, as Marcus Kreuzer points out, choose electoral systems. So how do economic interests translate into party political incentives to adopt electoral reform? We argue that parties in pr…

  • Real Exchange Rates and Competitiveness: The Political Economy of Skill Formation, Wage Compression, and Electoral Systems

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2010•Cited by: 28•References: 36

    A major puzzle in the open economy literature is why some countries have persistently higher real exchange rates than others. Even more puzzling is the fact that countries with high real exchange rates are strong export performers. We solve both puzzles with a model that integrates two central debates in the comparative political economy of advanced economies: one linking wage bargaining, incomes policy, and competitiveness, and the other linking…

  • Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•World Politics•2009•Cited by: 130•References: 38

    The authors present an alternative to power resource theory as an approach to the study of distribution and redistribution. While they agree that partisanship and union power are important, they argue that both are endogenous to more fundamental differences in the organization of capitalist democracies. specifically, center-left governments result from pr consensus political systems (as opposed to majoritarian systems), while strong unions have t…

  • Inequality in developed countries and Latin America: Coordinated, Liberal and Hierarchical Systems

    Ben Ross Schneider, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Economy and Society•2009•Cited by: 41•References: 36

    The first half of this article explains the enduring disparities in inequality and welfare states across advanced economies in terms of varieties of capitalism and political systems. Where capitalism is coordinated, as in much of northern Europe, political systems are consensus-based with proportional representation (PR); consensus politics and coordinated capitalism reinforce each other in generating relatively low inequality and strong welfare …

  • Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than Others

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, David Soskice•ARTICLE•SSRN Electronic Journal•2008

  • German economic performance: Disentangling the Role of Supply-Side Reforms, Macroeconomic Policy and Coordinated Economy Institutions

    W Carlin, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Socio-Economic Review•2008•Cited by: 23•References: 9

    Since unification, the debate about Germany's poor economic performance has focused on supply-side weaknesses, and the associated reform agenda sought to make low-skill labour markets more flexible. We question this diagnosis using three lines of argument. First, effective restructuring of the supply side in the core advanced industries was carried out by the private sector using institutions of the coordinated economy, including unions, works co…

  • Macroeconomics and Varieties of Capitalism

    David Soskice•CHAPTER•Beyond varieties of capitalism•2007

    This chapter shows how production regimes are complementary to welfare state regimes and political systems, perusing a number of arguments which have been developed over the period since the original publication of VoC in 2001. These complementarities serve as a background for understanding a fourth complementarity which has not been discussed before in any detail — that between CMEs and conservative systems of aggregate demand management. This i…

  • Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems

    Open Access•Thomas R Cusack, Trine Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2007•Cited by: 123•References: 48

    The standard explanation for the choice of electoral institutions, building on Rokkan's seminal work, is that proportional representation (PR) was adopted by a divided right to defend its class interests against a rising left. But new evidence shows that PR strengthens the left and redistribution, and we argue the standard view is wrong historically, analytically, and empirically. We offer a radically different explanation. Integrating two oppose…

  • New Macroeconomics and Political Science

    Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Political Science•2006•Cited by: 13•References: 64

    We review the use of macroeconomics in political science over the past 40 years. The field has been dominated by new classical theory, which leaves little room for economic policy and focuses attention on what democratic governments can do wrong in the short term. The resulting literatures on political business cycles and central bank independence are large and sophisticated, but they fail, we argue, to account for most of the observed variance i…

Next
  • An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2001•Cited by: 461•References: 24

    We present a theory of social policy preferences that emphasizes the composition of people's skills. The key to our argument is that individuals who have made risky investments in skills will demand insurance against the possible future loss of income from those investments. Because the transferability of skills is inversely related to their specificity, workers with specific skills face a potentially long spell of unemployment or a significant d…

  • Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2006•Cited by: 414•References: 41

    Standard political economy models of redistribution, notably that of Meltzer and Richard (1981), fail to account for the remarkable variance in government redistribution across democracies. We develop a general model of redistribution that explains why some democratic governments are more prone to redistribute than others. We show that the electoral system plays a key role because it shapes the nature of political parties and the composition of g…

  • Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•World Politics•2009•Cited by: 130•References: 38

    The authors present an alternative to power resource theory as an approach to the study of distribution and redistribution. While they agree that partisanship and union power are important, they argue that both are endogenous to more fundamental differences in the organization of capitalist democracies. specifically, center-left governments result from pr consensus political systems (as opposed to majoritarian systems), while strong unions have t…

  • Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems

    Open Access•Thomas R Cusack, Trine Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2007•Cited by: 123•References: 48

    The standard explanation for the choice of electoral institutions, building on Rokkan's seminal work, is that proportional representation (PR) was adopted by a divided right to defend its class interests against a rising left. But new evidence shows that PR strengthens the left and redistribution, and we argue the standard view is wrong historically, analytically, and empirically. We offer a radically different explanation. Integrating two oppose…

  • Democratic Limits to Redistribution: Inclusionary versus Exclusionary Coalitions in the Knowledge Economy

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•World Politics•2015•Cited by: 68•References: 22

    The knowledge economy, deindustrialization, and the decline of Fordism have undermined the economic complementarities that once existed between skilled and semiskilled workers. The result has everywhere been a decline in coordinated wage bargaining and unionization and a notable rise in labor market inequality. Yet, the political responses have been very different across advanced democracies. While labor markets for part-time and temporary employ…

  • Information, Inequality, and Mass Polarization: Ideology in Advanced Democracies

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•Comparative Political Studies•2015•Cited by: 64•References: 39

    Growing polarization in the American Congress is closely related to rising income inequality. Yet there has been no corresponding polarization of the U.S. electorate, and across advanced democracies, mass polarization is negatively related to income inequality. To explain this puzzle, we propose a comparative political economy model of mass polarization in which the same institutional factors that generate income inequality also undermine politic…

  • Varieties of Capitalism: And Then There Was One

    Cicely Howell, Chris Howell et al.•ARTICLE•Comparative Politics•2003•Cited by: 60

  • Informal Social Networks and Rational Voting

    Open Access•Samuel J Abram, Samuel Abram et al.•ARTICLE•British Journal of Political…•2011•Cited by: 57•References: 51

    Classical rational choice explanations of voting participation are widely thought to have failed. This article argues that the currently dominant Group Mobilization and Ethical Agency approaches have serious shortcomings in explaining individually rational turnout. It develops an informal social network (ISN) model in which people rationally vote if their informal networks of family and friends attach enough importance to voting, because voting l…

  • Inequality in developed countries and Latin America: Coordinated, Liberal and Hierarchical Systems

    Ben Ross Schneider, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Economy and Society•2009•Cited by: 41•References: 36

    The first half of this article explains the enduring disparities in inequality and welfare states across advanced economies in terms of varieties of capitalism and political systems. Where capitalism is coordinated, as in much of northern Europe, political systems are consensus-based with proportional representation (PR); consensus politics and coordinated capitalism reinforce each other in generating relatively low inequality and strong welfare …

  • Growth Models, Varieties of Capitalism, and Macroeconomics

    Open Access•Diane Hope, David Hopes et al.•ARTICLE•Latin American Politics and Society•2016•Cited by: 34•References: 4

    Lucio Baccaro and Jonas Pontusson make a significant contribution to comparative political economy with their approach to analyzing growth in advanced economies, which focuses on the demand side of the economy and distributive conflict. In contrast to Baccaro and Pontusson, however, we view their approach as reinforcing recent developments in varieties of capitalism rather than undermining them. We also believe that the type of modern macroeconom…

  • Crime, punishment and segregation in the United States: The paradox of local democracy

    Open Access•Nicola Lacey, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Punishment & Society•2015•Cited by: 28•References: 21

    Patterns of crime and punishment in the USA greatly magnify corresponding developments in other liberal market economies – Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK – faced with similar broad macro-technological transformations, namely the collapse of Fordism in the 1970s and 1980s and the development of knowledge economies in the 1990s and 2000s. In this article, we set out the case for seeing these differences as largely the product of dynamics…

  • Real Exchange Rates and Competitiveness: The Political Economy of Skill Formation, Wage Compression, and Electoral Systems

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2010•Cited by: 28•References: 36

    A major puzzle in the open economy literature is why some countries have persistently higher real exchange rates than others. Even more puzzling is the fact that countries with high real exchange rates are strong export performers. We solve both puzzles with a model that integrates two central debates in the comparative political economy of advanced economies: one linking wage bargaining, incomes policy, and competitiveness, and the other linking…

  • Coevolution of Capitalism and Political Representation: The Choice of Electoral Systems

    Open Access•Thomas R Cusack, Thomas Cusack et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2010•Cited by: 26•References: 27

    Protocorporatist West European countries in which economic interests were collectively organized adopted PR in the first quarter of the twentieth century, whereas liberal countries in which economic interests were not collectively organized did not. Political parties, as Marcus Kreuzer points out, choose electoral systems. So how do economic interests translate into party political incentives to adopt electoral reform? We argue that parties in pr…

  • Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Change: A Response to Three Critics

    Open Access•Peter A Hall, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Comparative European Politics•2003•Cited by: 24•References: 2

  • German economic performance: Disentangling the Role of Supply-Side Reforms, Macroeconomic Policy and Coordinated Economy Institutions

    W Carlin, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Socio-Economic Review•2008•Cited by: 23•References: 9

    Since unification, the debate about Germany's poor economic performance has focused on supply-side weaknesses, and the associated reform agenda sought to make low-skill labour markets more flexible. We question this diagnosis using three lines of argument. First, effective restructuring of the supply side in the core advanced industries was carried out by the private sector using institutions of the coordinated economy, including unions, works co…

  • Varieties of Capitalism and Cross-National Gender Differences

    David Soskice•ARTICLE•Social Politics International…•2005•Cited by: 22•References: 3

    Journal Article Varieties of Capitalism and Cross-National Gender Differences Get access David Soskice David Soskice Political Science at Duke University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, Volume 12, Issue 2, Summer 2005, Pages 170–179, https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi010 Published: 01 July 2005

  • Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism through a Turbulent Century

    Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•BOOK•Democracy and Prosperity•2019•Cited by: 20

  • Politics for markets

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Journal of European Social Policy•2015•Cited by: 17•References: 23

    We argue that the welfare state operates very differently in the advanced sectors of modern economies and in the low-skill sectors. Governments are concerned to promote the advanced sectors of their economies in which they have comparative advantage. This is a valence issue not a partisan one. Where companies and employees in advanced sectors co-invest heavily in company-specific skills, then governments will be concerned to maintain insurance in…

  • New Macroeconomics and Political Science

    Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Political Science•2006•Cited by: 13•References: 64

    We review the use of macroeconomics in political science over the past 40 years. The field has been dominated by new classical theory, which leaves little room for economic policy and focuses attention on what democratic governments can do wrong in the short term. The resulting literatures on political business cycles and central bank independence are large and sophisticated, but they fail, we argue, to account for most of the observed variance i…

  • Capital in the twenty-first century: A Critique

    Open Access•David Soskice•ARTICLE•British Journal of Sociology•2014•Cited by: 10•References: 9

    I set out and explain Piketty's model of the dynamics of capitalism based on two equations and the r > g inequality (his central contradiction of capitalism). I then take issue with Piketty's analysis of the rebuilding of inequality from the 1970s to the present on three grounds: First, his model is based on the (neo-classical) assumption that companies are essentially passive actors who invest the amount savers choose to accumulate at equilibriu…

  • Macroeconomics and the Wage Bargain: A Modern Approach to Employment, Inflation and the Exchange Rate

    Robin Naylor, Wendy Carlin et al.•ARTICLE•The Economic Journal•1992•Cited by: 9

    Journal Article Macroeconomics and the Wage Bargain: A Modern Approach to Employment, Inflation and the Exchange Rate Get access Macroeconomics and the Wage Bargain: A Modern Approach to Employment, Inflation and the Exchange Rate. By CARLIN (WENDY) and SOSKICE (DAVID). (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. Pp. xii + 482. £40.00 hardback, £14.95 paperback. ISBN 0 19 877245 9, 0 19 877244 0.) Robin Naylor Robin Naylor University of Warwick Searc…

  • Unionism, Economic Stabilisation and Incomes Policies: The European Experience

    Nicholas Rau, Robert J Flanagan et al.•ARTICLE•The Economic Journal•1985•Cited by: 3

    Journal Article Unionism, Economic Stabilisation and Incomes Policies: The European Experience Get access Unionism, Economic Stabilisation and Incomes Policies: The European Experience. By ROBERT J. FLANAGAN, DAVID W. SOSKICE and LLOYD ULMAN. (Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1983. Distributed by Costello, Tunbridge Wells. Pp. xviii + 705. £43.40.) Nicholas Rau Nicholas Rau University College London Search for other works by this author on:…

  • Inequality and Redistribution: A Unified Approach to the Role of Economic and Political Institutions

    Trine Iversen, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Revue économique•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    Cet article explique la persistance de disparités dans les niveaux d’inégalité et de protection sociale au sein des économies développées en termes de variétés de capitalismes et de systèmes politiques. Là où le capitalisme est coordonné, comme en Europe du Nord, les systèmes politiques sont fondés sur le consensus et les élections se font à la proportionnelle ; la politique de consensus et le capitalisme coordonné se renforcent mutuellement pour…

  • A propósito de los capitalismos contemporáneos: Variedades de capitalismo: Algunos aspectos fundamentales

    Open Access•Peter H Hall, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Desarrollo Económico•2006•Cited by: 1

  • A Modification of the CES Production Function to Allow for Changing Returns to Scale over the Function

    David Soskice•ARTICLE•The Review of Economics and…•1968

    originally proposed by Arrow, Chenery, A Minhas and Solow, the CES function was constrained to constant returns to scale. It has since been generalised to allow for any degree of homogeneity in the inputs. But the function is still constrained: if returns to scale are a when output is low, they are equally a when output is high. It is shown later in this paper that if this assumption is untrue, if what may be called point returns to scale are the…

  • Unionism, Economic Stabilisation and Incomes Policies: The European Experience

    Nicholas Rau, Robert J Flanagan et al.•ARTICLE•The Economic Journal•1985•Cited by: 3

    Journal Article Unionism, Economic Stabilisation and Incomes Policies: The European Experience Get access Unionism, Economic Stabilisation and Incomes Policies: The European Experience. By ROBERT J. FLANAGAN, DAVID W. SOSKICE and LLOYD ULMAN. (Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1983. Distributed by Costello, Tunbridge Wells. Pp. xviii + 705. £43.40.) Nicholas Rau Nicholas Rau University College London Search for other works by this author on:…

  • Unionism, Economic Stabilization and Income Policies: European Experience

    Michael Shalev, Robert J Flanagan et al.•ARTICLE•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1985

  • The Failure of Training in Britain: Analysis and Prescription

    David Finegold, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Oxford Review of Economic Policy•1988

    DAVID FINEGOLD, DAVID SOSKICE; THE FAILURE OF TRAINING IN BRITAIN: ANALYSIS AND PRESCRIPTION, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Volume 4, Issue 3, 1 October 198

  • Wage Determination: The Changing Role of Institutions in Advanced Industrialized Countries

    David Soskice•ARTICLE•Oxford Review of Economic Policy•1990

    DAVID SOSKICE; WAGE DETERMINATION: THE CHANGING ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS IN ADVANCED INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Volume 6, Issue 4

  • Reinterpreting Corporatism and Explaining Unemployment: Co-ordinated and Non-co-ordinated Market Economies

    David Soskice•CHAPTER•Labour Relations and Economic…•1990

    What is the role of institutions in economic performance? Neo-corporatist economists gave a clear answer to one specification of this question: namely the role of institutions in explaining unemployment in advanced industrial societies. They answered that economies with neo-corporatist institutions, in particular with strong, centralised systems of industrial relations, were more likely than other economies to produce low unemployment.

  • Macroeconomics and the Wage Bargain: A Modern Approach to Employment, Inflation and the Exchange Rate

    Robin Naylor, Wendy Carlin et al.•ARTICLE•The Economic Journal•1992•Cited by: 9

    Journal Article Macroeconomics and the Wage Bargain: A Modern Approach to Employment, Inflation and the Exchange Rate Get access Macroeconomics and the Wage Bargain: A Modern Approach to Employment, Inflation and the Exchange Rate. By CARLIN (WENDY) and SOSKICE (DAVID). (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. Pp. xii + 482. £40.00 hardback, £14.95 paperback. ISBN 0 19 877245 9, 0 19 877244 0.) Robin Naylor Robin Naylor University of Warwick Searc…

  • Shocks to the System: The German Political Economy Under Stress

    Open Access•Wendy Carlin, David Soskice•ARTICLE•National Institute Economic Review•1997

    The German economy is recovering hesitantly from the sharp post-unification boom and recession. Two features of recent West German performance are novel: there has been an unprecedented loss of jobs in industry, and manufacturing profitability has been pushed to its lowest level ever and is now low relative to other OECD economies. Serious problems with labour costs and innovation would be expected to show up in a weakening in the trend of export…

  • Wage Bargaining, Labour Markets and Macroeconomic Performance in Germany and the Netherlands

    David Soskice, Bob Hancké et al.•CHAPTER•German and Dutch Economies•1998

    Dutch economic performance in the 1990s has drawn envious attention from Germany: unemployment is low (6% in 1997 and falling), economic growth is strong, and its combination of low inflation and small budget deficit should allow it painlessly to meet Maastricht criteria for European Economic and Monetary Union. While similar economic results have also been achieved in the United States, the extent of deregulation implied by this approach has mad…

  • Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980s and 1990s

    Open Access•David Soskice•CHAPTER•Continuity and Change in…•1999

    The systematic analysis of advanced capitalist economies has had two main focuses. One has been the welfare state: this owes much to the work of Esping-Andersen in distinguishing three welfare state patterns in advanced economies (Esping-Andersen, this volume; Stephens, Huber, and Ray this volume). His distinctions have been widely accepted. There is less agreement in the analysis of the other main focus – and the focus of this chapter – producti…

  • Explaining changes in institutional frameworks: Societal patterns of business coordination

    David Soskice•CHAPTER•Embedding organizations•2000

  • Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State

    Margarita Estévez-Abe, Margarita Estévez‐Abe et al.•CHAPTER•Varieties of Capitalism•2001

    Outlines a new approach to the study of the welfare state. Contrary to the emphasis on ‘decommodification’ in the current literature, it is argued that important dimensions of the welfare state—employment protection, unemployment protection, and wage protection—are designed to make workers more willing to invest in firm‐ and industry‐specific skills that increase their dependence on particular employers and their vulnerability to market fluctuati…

  • Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage

    Peter A Hall, David Soskice•BOOK•Varieties of Capitalism•2001

    Applying the new economics of organization and relational theories of the firm to the problem of understanding cross‐national variation in the political economy, this volume elaborates a new understanding of the institutional differences that characterize the ‘varieties of capitalism’ found among the developed economies. Building on a distinction between ‘liberal market economies’ and ‘coordinated market economies’, it explores the impact of thes…

  • An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism

    Peter A Hall, David Soskice•CHAPTER•Varieties of Capitalism•2001

    This chapter outlines the theoretical perspective behind a ‘varieties of capitalism’ approach to comparative political economy, emphasizing the central role of the firm as the agent of economic adjustment and the impact of the relationships it forms in the spheres of corporate governance, labour relations, skill formation, inter‐corporate relations, and employer–employee relations. It develops the distinction between liberal market economies, whe…

  • An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2001•Cited by: 461•References: 24

    We present a theory of social policy preferences that emphasizes the composition of people's skills. The key to our argument is that individuals who have made risky investments in skills will demand insurance against the possible future loss of income from those investments. Because the transferability of skills is inversely related to their specificity, workers with specific skills face a potentially long spell of unemployment or a significant d…

  • L'Année de la régulation n° 6 (2002-2003)

    P A Hall, Peter Hall et al.•CHAPTER•L'Année de la régulation, numéro…•2002

    L’approche en termes de « variétés de capitalisme » pose que pour coordonner leurs activités, les entreprises peuvent soit compter principalement sur les marchés, soit s’appuyer sur des modes de coordination hors marché. Ces différences découlent du type et du niveau de soutien institutionnel disponible pour la coordination de marché ou pour la coordination hors marché, dans chacune des économies politiques. Selon le mode de coordination des acti…

  • Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities

    Peter A Hall, David Soskice•CHAPTER•Institutional Conflicts and…•2003

  • Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Change: A Response to Three Critics

    Open Access•Peter A Hall, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Comparative European Politics•2003•Cited by: 24•References: 2

  • Varieties of Capitalism: And Then There Was One

    Cicely Howell, Chris Howell et al.•ARTICLE•Comparative Politics•2003•Cited by: 60

  • Varieties of Capitalism and Cross-National Gender Differences

    David Soskice•ARTICLE•Social Politics International…•2005•Cited by: 22•References: 3

    Journal Article Varieties of Capitalism and Cross-National Gender Differences Get access David Soskice David Soskice Political Science at Duke University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, Volume 12, Issue 2, Summer 2005, Pages 170–179, https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi010 Published: 01 July 2005

  • New Macroeconomics and Political Science

    Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Political Science•2006•Cited by: 13•References: 64

    We review the use of macroeconomics in political science over the past 40 years. The field has been dominated by new classical theory, which leaves little room for economic policy and focuses attention on what democratic governments can do wrong in the short term. The resulting literatures on political business cycles and central bank independence are large and sophisticated, but they fail, we argue, to account for most of the observed variance i…

  • A propósito de los capitalismos contemporáneos: Variedades de capitalismo: Algunos aspectos fundamentales

    Open Access•Peter H Hall, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Desarrollo Económico•2006•Cited by: 1

  • A propósito de los capitalismos contemporáneos: Una respuesta a Bertoldi, Dore y Regini

    Open Access•Peter A Hall, David Soskice•ARTICLE•Desarrollo Económico•2006

  • Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2006•Cited by: 414•References: 41

    Standard political economy models of redistribution, notably that of Meltzer and Richard (1981), fail to account for the remarkable variance in government redistribution across democracies. We develop a general model of redistribution that explains why some democratic governments are more prone to redistribute than others. We show that the electoral system plays a key role because it shapes the nature of political parties and the composition of g…

  • Macroeconomics and Varieties of Capitalism

    David Soskice•CHAPTER•Beyond varieties of capitalism•2007

    This chapter shows how production regimes are complementary to welfare state regimes and political systems, perusing a number of arguments which have been developed over the period since the original publication of VoC in 2001. These complementarities serve as a background for understanding a fourth complementarity which has not been discussed before in any detail — that between CMEs and conservative systems of aggregate demand management. This i…

Economics (39 works) · Political science (37 works) · Politics (30 works) · Social Policy and Reform Studies (28 works) · Law (22 works) · Political economy (17 works) · Capitalism (14 works) · Law (14 works) · Market economy (14 works) · Economic system (12 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae