C Santana
Biographic Data
| ID | 33490 |
|---|---|
| NAME | C Santana |
| GIVEN NAMES | C |
| FAMILY NAME | Santana |
| SIGNATURE | SANTANA C |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Utah |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9570-1904 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 6 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Donnie Jonson Sackey. Trespassing Natures
Preach! (Practice not Included)
Hypocrisy is generally treated as particularly repugnant, perhaps the “only unforgivable sin.” I argue that this attitude is misplaced. Hypocrisy—especially quotidian hypocrisy by the average citizen—plays an essential role in maintaining and promoting a good society. Hypocrisy facilitates the establishment and maintenance of beneficial social norms, and can secure better social outcomes when full compliance with a norm is suboptimal. The hypocri…
The Value of Openness in Open Science
Open science is good for both epistemic and social reasons, but in nonobvious ways, it can have detrimental epistemic side effects. Drawing on case studies and the social epistemology of science, I show how practices intended to increase transparency, communication, and information sharing in science can backfire. We should not reject Open Science, just implement it carefully. I argue that we can do so by treating openness as a governing value in…
Embracing change
Combining ecological and socio-cultural analysis, we propose embracing the future-oriented concept of novel ecosystems. This perspective offers an alternative to the backwards-looking conservation attitude that uses metaphors of biological invasion, for example. With the case study of species whose range is shifting to include cities, we show that in a world of environmental novelty, effective conservation thinking must supplement narratives of i…
What’s wrong with dogwhistles
Why citizen review might beat peer review at identifying pursuitworthy scientific research
Let’s not agree to disagree
Covid-19, other zoonotic diseases and wildlife conservation
Covid-19, other zoonotic diseases and wildlife conservation
Let’s not agree to disagree
What’s wrong with dogwhistles
Why citizen review might beat peer review at identifying pursuitworthy scientific research
Embracing change
Combining ecological and socio-cultural analysis, we propose embracing the future-oriented concept of novel ecosystems. This perspective offers an alternative to the backwards-looking conservation attitude that uses metaphors of biological invasion, for example. With the case study of species whose range is shifting to include cities, we show that in a world of environmental novelty, effective conservation thinking must supplement narratives of i…
Preach! (Practice not Included)
Hypocrisy is generally treated as particularly repugnant, perhaps the “only unforgivable sin.” I argue that this attitude is misplaced. Hypocrisy—especially quotidian hypocrisy by the average citizen—plays an essential role in maintaining and promoting a good society. Hypocrisy facilitates the establishment and maintenance of beneficial social norms, and can secure better social outcomes when full compliance with a norm is suboptimal. The hypocri…
The Value of Openness in Open Science
Open science is good for both epistemic and social reasons, but in nonobvious ways, it can have detrimental epistemic side effects. Drawing on case studies and the social epistemology of science, I show how practices intended to increase transparency, communication, and information sharing in science can backfire. We should not reject Open Science, just implement it carefully. I argue that we can do so by treating openness as a governing value in…
Donnie Jonson Sackey. Trespassing Natures
Philosophy (4 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Academic Publishing and Open Access (2 works) · Biology (2 works) · Contemporary philosophy (2 works) · Ecology (2 works) · Environmental ethics (2 works) · Environmental Science (2 works)