Bartosz Brożek
Biographic Data
| ID | 3450267 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Bartosz Brożek |
| GIVEN NAMES | Bartosz |
| FAMILY NAME | Brożek |
| SIGNATURE | BROŻEK B |
| AFFILIATIONS | Chair of Theory and Philosophy of Law, Jagiellonian University, Bracka 12, 31-005 Kraków, Poland |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4324-6700 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 8 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2006 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Are We Machine or Are We Author? Rethinking Authorship and Its Ties to Copyright Amid Artificial Intelligence Creativity
With the development of generative Artificial Intelligence, the question of the nature of authorship in the copyright system has returned. Disillusioned with traditional answers based on the concept of copyright, we turn the tables and consider why we ask about authorship in the first place. In the following paper, we show that the real problem of machine creativity concerning copyright law is of epistemic origin (the attribution problem), why ne…
Analogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse
Exemplary judges are important for legal theory and legal practice.Still the conception of imitation of exempla as analogical reasoning is criticized here.Imitation as character development may well be more important.Thus, there is, at least, it is argued, one kind of exemplary reasoningnamely, imitative reasoning -that is not coextensive with analogical reasoning.Exempla have educational value, help in theorizing about excellence in adjudication…
Emotional Brain Revisited
Many Faces of Normativity
Logic in Theology
Philosophy in Science
Analogy in Legal Discourse
The aim of the paper is to show what the logical structure of reasoning by analogy in legal discourse is. Recently, two attempts - due to Brewer and Weinreb - have been made to explain analogical arguments. I criticize them both. Next, against the background of several examples, I reconstruct the general structure of analogy. The structure is taken as a starting point for developing a logical conception of analogical reasoning. It is my claim tha…
Methods of Legal Reasoning (Law and Philosophy Library)
The book attempts to describe and criticize four methods used in legal practice, legal dogmatics and legal theory: logic, analysis, argumentation and hermeneutics. Apart from a presentation of basic ideas connected with the above mentioned methods, the essays contained in this book seek to answer questions concerning the assumptions standing behind these methods, the limits of using them and their usefulness in the practice and theory of law. A s…
Analogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse
Exemplary judges are important for legal theory and legal practice.Still the conception of imitation of exempla as analogical reasoning is criticized here.Imitation as character development may well be more important.Thus, there is, at least, it is argued, one kind of exemplary reasoningnamely, imitative reasoning -that is not coextensive with analogical reasoning.Exempla have educational value, help in theorizing about excellence in adjudication…
Methods of Legal Reasoning (Law and Philosophy Library)
The book attempts to describe and criticize four methods used in legal practice, legal dogmatics and legal theory: logic, analysis, argumentation and hermeneutics. Apart from a presentation of basic ideas connected with the above mentioned methods, the essays contained in this book seek to answer questions concerning the assumptions standing behind these methods, the limits of using them and their usefulness in the practice and theory of law. A s…
Analogy in Legal Discourse
The aim of the paper is to show what the logical structure of reasoning by analogy in legal discourse is. Recently, two attempts - due to Brewer and Weinreb - have been made to explain analogical arguments. I criticize them both. Next, against the background of several examples, I reconstruct the general structure of analogy. The structure is taken as a starting point for developing a logical conception of analogical reasoning. It is my claim tha…
Philosophy in Science
Many Faces of Normativity
Logic in Theology
Emotional Brain Revisited
Analogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse
Exemplary judges are important for legal theory and legal practice.Still the conception of imitation of exempla as analogical reasoning is criticized here.Imitation as character development may well be more important.Thus, there is, at least, it is argued, one kind of exemplary reasoningnamely, imitative reasoning -that is not coextensive with analogical reasoning.Exempla have educational value, help in theorizing about excellence in adjudication…
Are We Machine or Are We Author? Rethinking Authorship and Its Ties to Copyright Amid Artificial Intelligence Creativity
With the development of generative Artificial Intelligence, the question of the nature of authorship in the copyright system has returned. Disillusioned with traditional answers based on the concept of copyright, we turn the tables and consider why we ask about authorship in the first place. In the following paper, we show that the real problem of machine creativity concerning copyright law is of epistemic origin (the attribution problem), why ne…
Legal Language and Interpretation (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Analogical reasoning (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Logic (2 works) · Logic (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Psychology (2 works)