Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jamie B Luguri

Biographic Data

ID3482613
NAMEJamie B Luguri
GIVEN NAMESJamie B
FAMILY NAMELuguri
SIGNATURELUGURI J B
AFFILIATIONSYale University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS44
AUTHOR COUNT8
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2012
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX3
  • Political differences in free will belief are associated with differences in moralization

    Jim A C Everett, Cory J Clark et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2021•Cited by: 3

    performed it (Studies 7a-d). These results are consistent with our theory that political differences in free will belief are at least partly explicable by conservatives' tendency to moralize, which strengthens motivation to justify blame with stronger belief in free will and personal accountability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

  • Shining a Light on Dark Patterns

    Open Access•Jamie B Luguri, Jamie Luguri et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Legal Analysis•2020

    Dark patterns are user interfaces whose designers knowingly confuse users, make it difficult for users to express their actual preferences, or manipulate users into taking certain actions. They typically exploit cognitive biases and prompt online consumers to purchase goods and services that they do not want or to reveal personal information they would prefer not to disclose. This article provides the first public evidence of the power of dark pa…

  • Are morally good actions ever free

    Open Access•Cory J Clark, Connie J Clark et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2018

  • Free Will and Punishment: A Mechanistic View of Human Nature Reduces Retribution

    Open Access•Abusaleh Shariff, Azim F Shariff et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Science•2014

    If free-will beliefs support attributions of moral responsibility, then reducing these beliefs should make people less retributive in their attitudes about punishment. Four studies tested this prediction using both measured and manipulated free-will beliefs. Study 1 found that people with weaker free-will beliefs endorsed less retributive, but not consequentialist, attitudes regarding punishment of criminals. Subsequent studies showed that learni…

  • Free to punish: A motivated account of free will belief

    Cory J Clark, Connie J Clark et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2014•Cited by: 13

    Belief in free will is a pervasive phenomenon that has important consequences for prosocial actions and punitive judgments, but little research has investigated why free will beliefs are so widespread. Across 5 studies using experimental, survey, and archival data and multiple measures of free will belief, we tested the hypothesis that a key factor promoting belief in free will is a fundamental desire to hold others morally responsible for their …

  • Moral Mind-Sets: Abstract Thinking Increases a Preference for “Individualizing” Over “Binding” Moral Foundations

    Open Access•Jaime L Napier, Jamie B Luguri•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2013

    Moral foundations theory contends that people’s morality goes beyond concerns about justice and welfare, and asserts that humans have five innate foundations of morality: harm and fairness (individualizing foundations) and in-group loyalty, deference to authority, and purity (binding foundations). The current research investigates whether people’s moral judgments are consistently informed by these five values, or whether individualizing and bindi…

  • Of two minds: The interactive effect of construal level and identity on political polarization

    Open Access•Jamie B Luguri, Jaime L Napier•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013•Cited by: 6•References: 18

  • Reconstruing Intolerance: Abstract Thinking Reduces Conservatives’ Prejudice Against Nonnormative Groups

    Open Access•Jamie B Luguri, Jaime L Napier et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Science•2012•Cited by: 22•References: 5

    Myrdal (1944) described the "American dilemma" as the conflict between abstract national values ("liberty and justice for all") and more concrete, everyday prejudices. We leveraged construal-level theory to empirically test Myrdal's proposition that construal level (abstract vs. concrete) can influence prejudice. We measured individual differences in construal level (Study 1) and manipulated construal level (Studies 2 and 3); across these three s…

  • Reconstruing Intolerance: Abstract Thinking Reduces Conservatives’ Prejudice Against Nonnormative Groups

    Open Access•Jamie B Luguri, Jaime L Napier et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Science•2012•Cited by: 22•References: 5

    Myrdal (1944) described the "American dilemma" as the conflict between abstract national values ("liberty and justice for all") and more concrete, everyday prejudices. We leveraged construal-level theory to empirically test Myrdal's proposition that construal level (abstract vs. concrete) can influence prejudice. We measured individual differences in construal level (Study 1) and manipulated construal level (Studies 2 and 3); across these three s…

  • Free to punish: A motivated account of free will belief

    Cory J Clark, Connie J Clark et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2014•Cited by: 13

    Belief in free will is a pervasive phenomenon that has important consequences for prosocial actions and punitive judgments, but little research has investigated why free will beliefs are so widespread. Across 5 studies using experimental, survey, and archival data and multiple measures of free will belief, we tested the hypothesis that a key factor promoting belief in free will is a fundamental desire to hold others morally responsible for their …

  • Of two minds: The interactive effect of construal level and identity on political polarization

    Open Access•Jamie B Luguri, Jaime L Napier•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013•Cited by: 6•References: 18

  • Political differences in free will belief are associated with differences in moralization

    Jim A C Everett, Cory J Clark et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2021•Cited by: 3

    performed it (Studies 7a-d). These results are consistent with our theory that political differences in free will belief are at least partly explicable by conservatives' tendency to moralize, which strengthens motivation to justify blame with stronger belief in free will and personal accountability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

  • Reconstruing Intolerance: Abstract Thinking Reduces Conservatives’ Prejudice Against Nonnormative Groups

    Open Access•Jamie B Luguri, Jaime L Napier et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Science•2012•Cited by: 22•References: 5

    Myrdal (1944) described the "American dilemma" as the conflict between abstract national values ("liberty and justice for all") and more concrete, everyday prejudices. We leveraged construal-level theory to empirically test Myrdal's proposition that construal level (abstract vs. concrete) can influence prejudice. We measured individual differences in construal level (Study 1) and manipulated construal level (Studies 2 and 3); across these three s…

  • Moral Mind-Sets: Abstract Thinking Increases a Preference for “Individualizing” Over “Binding” Moral Foundations

    Open Access•Jaime L Napier, Jamie B Luguri•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2013

    Moral foundations theory contends that people’s morality goes beyond concerns about justice and welfare, and asserts that humans have five innate foundations of morality: harm and fairness (individualizing foundations) and in-group loyalty, deference to authority, and purity (binding foundations). The current research investigates whether people’s moral judgments are consistently informed by these five values, or whether individualizing and bindi…

  • Of two minds: The interactive effect of construal level and identity on political polarization

    Open Access•Jamie B Luguri, Jaime L Napier•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013•Cited by: 6•References: 18

  • Free Will and Punishment: A Mechanistic View of Human Nature Reduces Retribution

    Open Access•Abusaleh Shariff, Azim F Shariff et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Science•2014

    If free-will beliefs support attributions of moral responsibility, then reducing these beliefs should make people less retributive in their attitudes about punishment. Four studies tested this prediction using both measured and manipulated free-will beliefs. Study 1 found that people with weaker free-will beliefs endorsed less retributive, but not consequentialist, attitudes regarding punishment of criminals. Subsequent studies showed that learni…

  • Free to punish: A motivated account of free will belief

    Cory J Clark, Connie J Clark et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2014•Cited by: 13

    Belief in free will is a pervasive phenomenon that has important consequences for prosocial actions and punitive judgments, but little research has investigated why free will beliefs are so widespread. Across 5 studies using experimental, survey, and archival data and multiple measures of free will belief, we tested the hypothesis that a key factor promoting belief in free will is a fundamental desire to hold others morally responsible for their …

  • Are morally good actions ever free

    Open Access•Cory J Clark, Connie J Clark et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2018

  • Shining a Light on Dark Patterns

    Open Access•Jamie B Luguri, Jamie Luguri et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Legal Analysis•2020

    Dark patterns are user interfaces whose designers knowingly confuse users, make it difficult for users to express their actual preferences, or manipulate users into taking certain actions. They typically exploit cognitive biases and prompt online consumers to purchase goods and services that they do not want or to reveal personal information they would prefer not to disclose. This article provides the first public evidence of the power of dark pa…

  • Political differences in free will belief are associated with differences in moralization

    Jim A C Everett, Cory J Clark et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2021•Cited by: 3

    performed it (Studies 7a-d). These results are consistent with our theory that political differences in free will belief are at least partly explicable by conservatives' tendency to moralize, which strengthens motivation to justify blame with stronger belief in free will and personal accountability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Psychology (7 works) · Social Psychology (7 works) · Law (5 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Free Will and Agency (4 works) · Cultural Differences and Values (3 works) · Free will (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae