Jean Maria Arrigo
Biographic Data
| ID | 3490280 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jean Maria Arrigo |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jean Maria |
| FAMILY NAME | Arrigo |
| SIGNATURE | ARRIGO J M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Alpine, CA, USA |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0811-258X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 10 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 16 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 10 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
A military/intelligence operational perspective on the American Psychological Association’s weaponization of psychology post-9/11
We examine the role of the American Psychological Association (APA) in the weaponization of American psychology post-9/11. In 2004, psychologists’ involvement in the detention and interrogation of terrorist suspects generated controversy over psychological ethics in national security (PENS). Two signal events inflamed the controversy. The 2005 APA PENS Report legitimized clinical psychology consultation in support of military/intelligence operati…
Response to Staal “psychological ethics and operational psychology”—fundamental issues and methods
Second response to Staal
Interrogating the ethics of operational psychology
Commissioned amidst allegations of collusion between American Psychological Association officials and Central Intelligence Agency and Department of Defense officials involved in the enhanced interrogation programme, the July 2015 Hoffman Report documented a decade of collusion between American Psychological Association and Department of Defense officials in unethical national security interrogations. However, interrogation support is but one of n…
Adversarial operational psychology
Adversarial operational psychology is unethical psychology
Psychology under fire
The 9/11 attacks on the United States have motivated psychologists to advance counterterrorism and related operations through psychological principles and skills. These operational psychologists seek to legitimize adversarial interventions against targets by prioritizing societal welfare over traditional, individual-focused principles of psychological ethics. In this essay, we distinguish adversarial operational psychology, which facilitates dece…
Psychologists and military interrogators rethink the psychology of torture
Torture interrogation does not yield reliable information. The popular belief that “torture works” conflicts with effective non-abusive methodologies of interrogation and with fundamental tenets of psychology. These were the conclusions reached at a meeting of recently retired, senior U.S. Army interrogators and research psychologists who met to rethink the psychology of torture. This article introduces the military interrogators, the psychologis…
"Organizational supports for abusive interrogations in the "War on Terror
This article addresses the following conundrum: How do abusive interrogations persist in the “War on Terror” over the practical objections of senior interrogators? Although the behavior of interrogator and interrogatee and the conditions of detention occupy the limelight in public controversies, every defense-related interrogation is deeply embedded in a web of organizational precedents and procedures. This article examines three major elements, …
A Dialogue Between Peace Psychology and Military Ethics
(2005). Intorduction: A Dialogue Between Peace Psychology and Military Ethics. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology: Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-7
Psychology under fire
The 9/11 attacks on the United States have motivated psychologists to advance counterterrorism and related operations through psychological principles and skills. These operational psychologists seek to legitimize adversarial interventions against targets by prioritizing societal welfare over traditional, individual-focused principles of psychological ethics. In this essay, we distinguish adversarial operational psychology, which facilitates dece…
Interrogating the ethics of operational psychology
Commissioned amidst allegations of collusion between American Psychological Association officials and Central Intelligence Agency and Department of Defense officials involved in the enhanced interrogation programme, the July 2015 Hoffman Report documented a decade of collusion between American Psychological Association and Department of Defense officials in unethical national security interrogations. However, interrogation support is but one of n…
Adversarial operational psychology
Adversarial operational psychology is unethical psychology
Psychologists and military interrogators rethink the psychology of torture
Torture interrogation does not yield reliable information. The popular belief that “torture works” conflicts with effective non-abusive methodologies of interrogation and with fundamental tenets of psychology. These were the conclusions reached at a meeting of recently retired, senior U.S. Army interrogators and research psychologists who met to rethink the psychology of torture. This article introduces the military interrogators, the psychologis…
A Dialogue Between Peace Psychology and Military Ethics
(2005). Intorduction: A Dialogue Between Peace Psychology and Military Ethics. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology: Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-7
A Dialogue Between Peace Psychology and Military Ethics
(2005). Intorduction: A Dialogue Between Peace Psychology and Military Ethics. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology: Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-7
Psychologists and military interrogators rethink the psychology of torture
Torture interrogation does not yield reliable information. The popular belief that “torture works” conflicts with effective non-abusive methodologies of interrogation and with fundamental tenets of psychology. These were the conclusions reached at a meeting of recently retired, senior U.S. Army interrogators and research psychologists who met to rethink the psychology of torture. This article introduces the military interrogators, the psychologis…
"Organizational supports for abusive interrogations in the "War on Terror
This article addresses the following conundrum: How do abusive interrogations persist in the “War on Terror” over the practical objections of senior interrogators? Although the behavior of interrogator and interrogatee and the conditions of detention occupy the limelight in public controversies, every defense-related interrogation is deeply embedded in a web of organizational precedents and procedures. This article examines three major elements, …
Psychology under fire
The 9/11 attacks on the United States have motivated psychologists to advance counterterrorism and related operations through psychological principles and skills. These operational psychologists seek to legitimize adversarial interventions against targets by prioritizing societal welfare over traditional, individual-focused principles of psychological ethics. In this essay, we distinguish adversarial operational psychology, which facilitates dece…
Adversarial operational psychology
Adversarial operational psychology is unethical psychology
Interrogating the ethics of operational psychology
Commissioned amidst allegations of collusion between American Psychological Association officials and Central Intelligence Agency and Department of Defense officials involved in the enhanced interrogation programme, the July 2015 Hoffman Report documented a decade of collusion between American Psychological Association and Department of Defense officials in unethical national security interrogations. However, interrogation support is but one of n…
Response to Staal “psychological ethics and operational psychology”—fundamental issues and methods
Second response to Staal
A military/intelligence operational perspective on the American Psychological Association’s weaponization of psychology post-9/11
We examine the role of the American Psychological Association (APA) in the weaponization of American psychology post-9/11. In 2004, psychologists’ involvement in the detention and interrogation of terrorist suspects generated controversy over psychological ethics in national security (PENS). Two signal events inflamed the controversy. The 2005 APA PENS Report legitimized clinical psychology consultation in support of military/intelligence operati…
Psychology (8 works) · Law (7 works) · Law (7 works) · Political science (7 works) · Applied Psychology (5 works) · Applied Psychology (5 works) · Engineering ethics (5 works) · Torture, Ethics, and Law (5 works) · Engineering (4 works) · Sociology (4 works)